Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: Speaker’s Jet Not Good Enough for Me
gopusa.com ^ | Bobby Eberle

Posted on 02/16/2007 8:27:53 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is proving once again that the Democrat label of “party of the people” is simply that: a label. Now, the San Francisco liberal is complaining about the size of the House speaker’s jet and requesting one much larger than Republican Dennis Hastert was provided.

As noted in a FOX News story, following the attacks of September 11, 2001, “the Pentagon agreed to provide the House speaker, who is second in the line of presidential succession, with a military plane for added security during trips back home.”


C-20 twin-engine aircraft

Republican Dennis Hastert was the first speaker of the House to be provided with this service, and he used a commuter-style jet to get him back to his home in Illinois. The jet at his disposal was a C-20 twin-engine aircraft. House Speaker Pelosi has requested the use of a C-32 aircraft, which is the military equivalent of a Boeing 757.

According to a story in the Washington Times, that Pelosi’s staff “was pressing the Department of Defense for an Air Force aircraft large enough to fly nonstop to San Francisco. She also has pressed to be able to include other members of the California congressional delegation, her family members and her staff on the plane.”

Republicans have accused Pelosi of “extravagance” and of wanting a plane where she could reward friends and associates. The Washington Times reports that “the Pentagon denied a request by Mrs. Pelosi to fly on a military aircraft to last weekend’s Democratic retreat in Williamsburg, a two-hour drive from Washington.”

In order to counter the criticism from Republicans and to turn the story around, Pelosi is now blaming administration officials for twisting the story:

These “misrepresentations could be coming from the administration,” she told reporters yesterday.

“One would only have to wonder why,” she said, though adding that she did not suspect President Bush “because he has impressed upon me over and over again the need for me to have the security that I need.”


C-32 Military Aircraft

The Pentagon said yesterday that Pelosi would not be provided with the C-32 which is estimated to cost in excess of $22,000 per hour to operate. In a letter to the speaker, the Pentagon’s ruling “essentially limits her to the commuter plane used by former Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, which requires refueling to travel from Washington to Mrs. Pelosi’s San Francisco district. A second source, in the Bush administration, confirmed the contents of the letter.”

According to the Times, “the letter stipulates that the Air Force will only fly her between Washington and her San Francisco district and places limits on who can travel with her. ”

If there is one thing the voters made clear in November, it is that they are tired of politicians putting themselves over their constituents. They are elected to serve, not to be served. Pelosi has a long way to go to learn that lesson.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: environmentalist; hypocrit; liar; sanfrannan; ultraliberal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Iam1ru1-2

Nazi Pelosi needs a larger plane with full fuel tanks so the plane can be used by terrorists to slam into tall buildings


21 posted on 02/16/2007 8:55:17 PM PST by FDNYRHEROES (Always bring a liberal to a gunfight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Let's activate the "Spruce Goose" for Speaker Pelosi..... she can have a nice big plane that can even land on water!!

Of course, it might not be the most reliable after 60 years of inactivity, and I don't know what its range might be....

http://www.sprucegoose.org/aircraft_artifacts/exhibits.html


22 posted on 02/16/2007 8:56:54 PM PST by Enchante (Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

An issue that generally seems to be left out of these discussions is that Pelosi's base in SF is 2,800 air miles from DC, versus Hastert's base in IL at 700 miles from DC.

Does 4 times the distance make it reasonable for this Speaker to use a larger and more comfortable plane?

I have no idea. I just think it odd that this rather significant fact is generally ignored in the stories.

I used to regularly fly across the country on business, and I can testify that an all day flight is highly wearing, when compared to a 2 hour flight.


23 posted on 02/16/2007 8:57:41 PM PST by Sherman Logan (Recognition of one's ignorance is the beginning of wisdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
How about this?


WEATHER BALLOON

24 posted on 02/16/2007 9:00:41 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2 (We not only have a lame duck president, we have a lame duck GOP party, and a lame Govenor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
In a letter to the speaker, the Pentagon’s ruling “essentially limits her to the commuter plane used by former Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, which requires refueling to travel from Washington to Mrs. Pelosi’s San Francisco district.

Range: C-20B, 4,250 miles (3,698 nautical miles) long-range; C-20H, 4,850 miles (4,220 nautical miles) long range.

It is 2,450 air miles from DC to Sodom by the Sea. The C-20 could probably fly non-stop from DC to Anchorage, AK.

25 posted on 02/16/2007 9:02:15 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Democrat Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
"An issue that generally seems to be left out of these discussions is that Pelosi's base in SF is 2,800 air miles from DC, versus Hastert's base in IL at 700 miles from DC."

If business men and women can make cross country flights in their small private jets EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE YEAR, then Nanny Peroshky shouldn't complain about the plane provided for her......after all she's all for the environment.....isn't she? Or does environmentalism only apply to us peons?

26 posted on 02/16/2007 9:06:52 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2 (Extreme weather changes in U.S. is God's answer to a demonrat victory in Nov '06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
From Gulfstream's website

Gulfstream II / III / C-20 / SRA-1VIP Transport / Reconnaissance Platform

INFORMATION:

Designation: Gulfstream II / III / C-20 / SRA-1

Manufacturer: Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation - USA

Country: United States

Service Date: 1983

Type: VIP Transport / Reconnaissance Platform

Crew: 2 + 21

DIMENSIONS:

Length: 79.9 ft (24.36 m)

Wingspan: 68.8 ft (20.98 m)

Height: 24.5 ft (7.47 m)

Weight (Empty): 36,900 lbs (16,740 kg)

Weight (Loaded): 65,500 lbs (29,710 kg)

PERFORMANCE:

Powerplant: 2 x Rolls-Royce Spey Mark 511-8 turbofan engines generating 11,400lbs of thrust

Max Speed: 581.6 mph (936 km/h)

Max Range: 4,275 miles (6,880 km)

Service Ceiling: 45,000 ft (13,716 m)

Rate of Climb: 4,350 ft/min (1,325.88 m/min)

I just don't understand the issue with Queen Nancy. What a bitch.

Check out this site!

http://www.travelnotes.org/NorthAmerica/distances.htm

It states:

From San Francisco to Washington, DC is about 2840 miles

The witch could get there and almost all the back on the same tank of fuel. She'd be 1,405 miles short. Maybe, she could land in Kansas and just stay there.

27 posted on 02/16/2007 9:11:30 PM PST by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

I'm certainly under the impression that a Gulfstream III (C20B) is an extremely comfortable aircraft that most of us would really enjoy flying in :-).

Here are the specs:
http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=87

D


28 posted on 02/16/2007 9:12:42 PM PST by daviddennis (If you like my stuff, please visit amazing.com, my new social networking site!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
Oh, wouldn`t it be a Hoot to see the old Saturday Night gang take on Nancy and Hillorat? Pick any subject you want. Think about this, the current crop of Rats are really all charactors in a SNL skit. I can see them featuring a debate between Hillorat and Obababa, Joe Biden trying to explain traffic signs, Teddy doing a scotch ad, Harry Reid pitching Real Estate, Dodd waking up, nobody caring, Murtha in a beer joint, oh, the list is endless.
29 posted on 02/16/2007 9:14:27 PM PST by neverhillorat (IF THE RATS WIN, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Only if it has a successful flight probability of less than 5%.
30 posted on 02/16/2007 9:23:05 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Veritas. Gravitas. Ohmygas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: devolve; ntnychik; Iam1ru1-2

  
LEAVING ON A JET PLANE


  

31 posted on 02/16/2007 9:27:10 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

"An issue that generally seems to be left out of these discussions is that Pelosi's base in SF is 2,800 air miles from DC, versus Hastert's base in IL at 700 miles from DC.

Does 4 times the distance make it reasonable for this Speaker to use a larger and more comfortable plane?

I have no idea. I just think it odd that this rather significant fact is generally ignored in the stories.

I used to regularly fly across the country on business, and I can testify that an all day flight is highly wearing, when compared to a 2 hour flight."



Sherman; Yeah, I fly quite a bit on domestic and international too. I agree it is a bit draining. I also am checked out to fly G-IIIs and IVs, and they have WAY more than enough range to fly non-stop from DC to SanFran. The book answer, based on max pax weight and full fuel is 3655nm (C20B/GIII) and 4220nm (C20H/GIV) depending on the how many pax (they would have to be pretty fat to affect a distance to SanFran). SanFran is about 3100nm from DC. Andrews AFB (the VIP transportation squadron at the heart of this question) flys C-20Bs and C-20Hs, which are G-IIIs and G-Ivs respectively.

This NOT about range or refueling, this is about using a freakin' large bodied airliner with seating for 80+ (it could hold 300+, but its modified with a meeting room, VIP area, comm suite, and other extravegant stuff, I've been on board the actual aircraft she's requesting) versus a 12-16 pax biz jet. This is FRAUD, plain and simple. Don't let her security argument complicate it.

Welcome to Free Republic, I see you are newbie.


32 posted on 02/16/2007 9:31:55 PM PST by church16 (“People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jws3sticks

No, she can't land in Kansas, unless she and Toto want to complete the trip in a tornado. Also, we have vagrancy laws that should keep her kind out of the state..


33 posted on 02/16/2007 9:33:44 PM PST by tdscpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis

From the C20 specs:

General Characteristics
Primary Function: C-20B/H, special air and operational support airlift missions
Builder: Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.
Power Plant: C-20B, two Rolls-Royce Spey Mark 511-8 turbofan engines;C-20H, two Rolls-Royce Tay Mark 611-8 turbofan engines
Thrust: C-20B, 11,400 pounds each engine; C-20H, 13,850 pounds each engine
Length: C-20B, 83 feet, 2 inches (25.4 meters); C-20H, 88 feet, 4 inches (26.9 meters)
Height: 24 feet, 6 inches (7.5 meters)
Wingspan: 77 feet, 10 inches (23.7 meters)
Speed: 576 mph (501 nautical miles per hour) maximum
Maximum Takeoff Weight: C-20B, 69,700 pounds (31,610 kilograms); C-20H, 74,600 pounds (33,832 kilograms)
Range: C-20B, 4,250 miles (3,698 nautical miles) long-range; C-20H, 4,850 miles (4,220 nautical miles) long range

The plane can fly 3700-4200 nautical miles. Isn't that enough to get her saggy butt back to San Fransisco?


34 posted on 02/16/2007 9:35:55 PM PST by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tdscpa

Wrong character. The reason she won't stop in Kansas is she is afraid a house will land on her.


35 posted on 02/16/2007 9:47:14 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter ( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Sorry Nancy,

I don't think you can get to California non-stop on a solar or ethanol powered jet. Good luck though!


36 posted on 02/16/2007 9:49:18 PM PST by amichaels (Drill Alaska!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillaryBeGone
DC to San Francisco is 2128 nautical miles.

The G-III has a range of 3698 nautical miles. But thats not figured with a full load or full crew. Or weather conditions. Fully loaded and crewed range might be in the 2500-2800 nm range.

Also every plane is different but you have to plan on reserves. So its quite possible that fully loaded on the G-III and weather conditions, that 2128 might not quite be able to make it, without refueling.

Now the C-37 is a G500/550 it has 6,000+nm range which fully loaded and crewed plus reserves gives you plenty from coast to coast.

Also the G550 costs about $5000 per hour versus the $22,000 per hour of the C-32.

37 posted on 02/16/2007 9:49:42 PM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
“One would only have to wonder why,” she said, though adding that she did not suspect President Bush “because he has impressed upon me over and over again the need for me to have the security that I need.”

Bush was talking about a padded cell.

38 posted on 02/16/2007 9:51:06 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

she needs a bigger aircraft to carry her ever-expanding ego...


39 posted on 02/16/2007 9:51:38 PM PST by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimask
What's wrong with her broom? If her broom isn't working she can borrow Hillary's.

Thats what you'd call a wide body.

40 posted on 02/16/2007 9:52:08 PM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson