Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani's Star Might Be Rising (Lavish Praise from Gingrich Caps Big Week for 'America's Mayor')
ABC News ^ | Feb. 16, 2007 | TEDDY DAVIS

Posted on 02/16/2007 4:34:15 PM PST by Jet Jaguar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401 next last
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Sheeat, Newt, you may be smarter than I am, but, not by that much! Newt, I would love to discuss "conservative" with you, from a redneck point of view! Set the date, I ain't hard to find! No presets, no moderation, no rules, just stand, like a man, and debate! I get to interupt you, anytime you get off track, and go to blowing smoke, and you get the same! Newt, do you have the balls to debate an old swampdwelling redneck freeper, all your degrees, against my little AA, in front of a freeper panel? Anything goes, Newt, man to man!

You know, being louder than your opponent doesn't really win debates. Newt Gingrich is in possession of a giant intellect. What do you have to bring to the match other than the admitted redneck failings of being loud and interrupting?

101 posted on 02/16/2007 5:49:48 PM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Newt can raise money very easily.


102 posted on 02/16/2007 5:50:09 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Gingrich always was a squish.

Gingrich too? I've heard him called a lot of things but I don't think I've ever heard him called 'squish'. He's always been considered one of the more conservative sorts in the Republican party. If Gingrich is showing support for him, that's a pretty strong semi-endorsement.

BTW, when is the 'esteemed' Mr. Keyes going to throw his support behind Giuliani? Or is he going to run under some third party no one's ever heard of? I hear the Christian Falangist Party may be looking for candidates. They look kooky enough. And the Prohibition Party is still in business too...

103 posted on 02/16/2007 5:50:16 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Do you live in his district or did you just admire him from afar, like most of us do when elected officials are not from our respective states or districts?


104 posted on 02/16/2007 5:50:44 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: WestSylvanian
we have to choose between two New Yorkers. Yuck! It's too revolting even to think about it.

As we say in the Bronx:

Up yours.

105 posted on 02/16/2007 5:51:09 PM PST by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: WestSylvanian

You have a problem with New Yorkers? Besides Hillary is Not a New Yorker no matter how much she pretends to be.


106 posted on 02/16/2007 5:52:11 PM PST by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Astounding. The only explanation I can see, as I stated before,

"Rudy is the only one who can beat Hillary."

I disagree, but that is my best guess.


107 posted on 02/16/2007 5:52:15 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: WestSylvanian

"Rudy vs. Hillary and we have to choose between two New Yorkers. Yuck! It's too revolting even to think about it."

I don't think those will be the choices in Nov 08.


108 posted on 02/16/2007 5:52:42 PM PST by Beagle8U (Jimmy Carter changed me into a Republican.......R. W. Reagan made me DAMN proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: oceanview; WestSylvanian
Santorum? he couldn't even win a statewide election in his home state.

That could be a problem. But I do like him.

109 posted on 02/16/2007 5:53:22 PM PST by redgirlinabluestate (Romney/Gingrich? Rudy/Romney?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
>>>>Rudy the RINO is pulling the rino hide over many in the party. I am totally with you.

Thanks. But you may regret saying that around here. ;^)

I'm convinced with Rudy at the top of the ticket, the GOP will suffer its worse Prez loss since 1964. Unless GOPers support a conservative candidate things look bleak. The 2006 election results offer a snapshot of how the 2008 election will turn out. If only Pubbies are willing to listen.

110 posted on 02/16/2007 5:53:39 PM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: billbears
BTW, when is the 'esteemed' Mr. Keyes going to throw his support behind Giuliani?

Not even when hell freezes over.

111 posted on 02/16/2007 5:53:41 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Nope I never lived in Georgia. I move all the time.


112 posted on 02/16/2007 5:53:48 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: All
Yes, for the first time I agree that McCain's star is going DOWN... FINALLY!

Now we must the the same with GULLIANI THE "TROJAN HORSE."

(Just a reminder to conservatives out there... The Media ballgame is changing as we speak!...No longer can they call shots... And no longer we have to just "take it." No, we want to PARTICIPATE in the choosing of our Republican Presidential candidate)

BEWARE!... Social-conservatives, Christian conservatives or moral-conservatives of ANY KIND..

********************* WE NEED TO UNITE IN OUR PURPOSE!!! ************************

WHO? I don't know, but here we are, in the middle of the Internet revolution, and yet, I feel as if someone, somewhere, is pulling the strings to elect a LEFTY 'Republican,' leaving us conservatives out of the loop and I DON'T LIKE IT!

Who is calling the shots here?... I guess special interest(s) with $$ MONEY $$, I "hear" it already, someone literally telling me, "Go, go little unimportant people, go home...Leave this to the EXPERTS. We the smart people will let you know when to vote.. go on, get lost! - LOL.

I believe Guliani's CONSULTANTS tactic is simply to DIVIDE the Republicans. To attract as many Lefty Republicans (I still don't get used to the label /s) by selling Mr. Guiliani as the CHAMPION OF NATIONAL SECURITY! to us, but I would not be surprised if we get a new batch of "converts" from the 'other side,' to push him over the top. Either I am paranoid but actually BELIEVE this "adoration," for this guy is orchestrated by some special interest out there. Just because, yes, He cleaned up N.Y. and acted with leadership on 9/11... Great as those things are, does not make him the Republican Presidential candidate by default...HARDLY!

And I should say, if he were a social-conservative (as DUNCAN is) THEN, I would be pushing hard for him!... But as it is... THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL I WILL VOTE FOR HIM!... Because if he gets elected, well, social-conservatives LOSE AND the LEFT WINS... That simple. All true social, Christian or Moral conservatives should above all, DENY our vote to the Left... And Rudy is the LEFT on social issues, and those are our issues.

So let's get excited about the challenge... Because I have this funny feeling that this maybe the first time THE PEOPLE will actually defeat the CONSULTANTES! :)

So Let's do it people. Let's show them we are not the dumb a*** they think we are :)


113 posted on 02/16/2007 5:53:48 PM PST by ElPatriota (Duncan Hunter 08 & Let's not forget, we are all still friends, basically :) despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I pinged areafifty in my post #8, along with PKM who is busy tonight at a GOP function.




BINGO......Didn't see that....Then you beat me here.....LOL


114 posted on 02/16/2007 5:54:32 PM PST by JulieRNR21 (Proverbs 3:5; “Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding…”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Oh, my error. I thought you were talking bout Ron Paul --- he represents a district in TX. Newt's from Georgia.


115 posted on 02/16/2007 5:56:23 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: zarf; WestSylvanian; areafiftyone

Hey, this son of the Confederacy (small "S", I don't belong to the organization) doesn't have a problem with a New Yorker being President...as long as he doesn't move to Virginia...

But seriously, two New York candidates? It'll be like a Subway Series!


116 posted on 02/16/2007 5:56:23 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (http://www.virginiaisforrudy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Hillary is Not a New Yorker no matter how much she pretends to be.

Not true. Saw her in a Yankees hat once.

117 posted on 02/16/2007 5:56:32 PM PST by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I make no secret of my support for Duncan Hunter, but I like to approach these things objectively, considering all the variables. I have a question for the Rudy supporters; particularly those who would ideally prefer a more conservative candidate, but who don't believe any of them are viable in the general election.

As far as I can tell, it's pretty universally accepted that the reason Republicans lost the majority last November was due to increasing sentiment against the war. Many Rudy supporters have stressed that his socially liberal positions shouldn't get in the way of our supporting him, because he's "right on the war" and that's the most important thing. So my question is this. If enough voters turned out to vote against the war to shift the balance of Congress, how do you see them not voting the same way in the Presidential election; i.e., voting against the war by voting against someone who, from our perspective, is "right" on it?

This is an honest strategy question.


118 posted on 02/16/2007 5:56:43 PM PST by william clark (DH4WH - Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21

LOL -- stunned silence here, huh?


119 posted on 02/16/2007 5:57:49 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: WestSylvanian

Hillary is from Arkansas.


120 posted on 02/16/2007 5:57:54 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson