Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here comes Newt!
The Hill ^ | February 16, 2007 | Dick Morris

Posted on 02/16/2007 5:58:43 AM PST by PDR

To echo the famous Negro League pitcher Satchel Paige: “Don’t look back, Newt Gingrich might be gaining on you.” Newt, consigned by many observers to Elizabeth Dole or Dan Quayle status in this GOP nominating process, appears to be moving up into contention, overtaking former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and battling to be the conservative alternative to either former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani or Arizona Sen. John McCain.

To grasp what’s happening, don’t think of states like New Hampshire or Iowa or worry whether it’s too early or too late. The key to following the Republican presidential nominating process this year is to recognize its essential similarity to the tennis’s U.S. Open at Forest Hills. There are quarter-finals, semi-finals, and finals.

In the quarter-finals, the center and the right each sort out the nominees to choose their candidate. On center court, Giuliani seems to be gaining a decisive lead over McCain’s impoverished presidential campaign. But on the right-hand court, unnoticed by most pundits, Gingrich seems to be building a lead over Romney and a host of conservative wannabes. The ultimate winner of the Giuliani/McCain quarter-final will face the winner of the Gingrich/Romney match-up in the semi-finals.

As McCain drops in the polls — he’s down to 22 percent while Rudy is up at 34 percent in the latest Fox News poll — some conservatives seem eager for a “real Republican” to challenge for the nomination. Their first choice, former Virginia Sen. George Allen, lies a-moldering in the grave and his runner-up, former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, has gone home to Tennessee.

Most observers assumed that Romney would fill the void. But he doesn’t seem to have been able to do so. It may be a racist refusal to vote for a Mormon or, more charitably, Romney’s flip-flop-flip from pro-life to pro-choice to pro-life, or it may have been his inconsistency on gay issues, but Mitt seems to be going the way of his father — out of contention. The Fox News poll, which recorded a surge to up to 8 percent of the GOP vote in its Dec. 5-6 tally, now has Romney dropping back to only 3 percent of the vote.

Enter Newt. Hungry for new ideas and desperate after losing Congress, Republican voters seem to be rallying to the only real genius in the race — the former Speaker. The statute of limitations seems to have expired on his personal scandals and Gingrich is striking a responsive chord among conservatives.

Fox News’s Jan. 30-31 survey had Newt leaving Romney way behind and challenging McCain for second place. The former Speaker’s vote share was 15 percent, giving him third place in the current standings.

Episodically, I just addressed a 450-person Lincoln Day dinner of the Lane County Republican Party in Eugene, Ore. A show of hands brought these results: Giuliani, 50 percent; Gingrich, 30 percent; McCain, 6 percent; Romney, 4 percent. A few days before, a speech to an Orlando investors group produced similar results.

But, as the slogan of the New York State Lottery goes: “You can’t win if you don’t play.” Newt’s current posture of waiting until the fall of 2007 to see how the process sorts itself out won’t work. The process abhors a vacuum. If Gingrich doesn’t move out to respond to the affection of the GOP base, one of the minor-leaguers — Huckabee, Brownback, Gilmore, Thompson, Hunter or Tancredo — will.

The irony of the GOP field at the moment is that while most Republicans are conservatives, the two frontrunners — Rudy and McCain — are moderates. And this isn’t Nelson Rockefeller’s Republican Party anymore! Gingrich is filling a real political need and if he moves out smartly and files his paperwork, takes his announcement bows, and journeys to Iowa and New Hampshire as a candidate, he might well be a contender.

Morris, a former political adviser to Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and President Bill Clinton, is the author of “Condi vs. Hillary: The Next Great Presidential Race.” To get all of Dick Morris’s and Eileen McGann’s columns for free by email, go to www.dickmorris.com.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; election; gingrich; gop; newt; newtgingrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: marvlus; politicalwit

or he's backing another candidate whose ability to raise funds and command attention is threatened by even the possibility of a Gingrich candidacy


81 posted on 02/16/2007 10:09:45 AM PST by PDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: PDR

Newt would be my favorite candidate, but unfortunately I don't think he can overcome the baggage and win a general election.


82 posted on 02/16/2007 10:14:38 AM PST by RWR8189 (Support the Republican Study Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PDR
You choose to be a catholic, you're not born one. Catholicism is a religion.

Being Jewish is either a nationality and or a religion.

If someone is hated for being of the Jewish race, which arabs do, thats racism.

If someone is "hated" for their religion, thats bigotry or stupidity.

If someone is voted for or against, because of their religion, they call that discretion.

83 posted on 02/16/2007 10:15:59 AM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

If Newt is nominated, he will be like Nixon in 1968, media detested, voter approved.


84 posted on 02/16/2007 12:13:29 PM PST by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Since JFK the Presidency goes to the sexiest, most, telegenic, most personable person in the race.

Yep, that explains Johnson, Nixon, Carter and Bush I.

85 posted on 02/16/2007 12:15:18 PM PST by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father
Why are the Libs in the media telling the American people that Republicans won't vote for a Mormon?

I like Mitt, and I hope he gets a chance tell us what he wants to do as President.
86 posted on 02/16/2007 2:00:04 PM PST by backbencher (Nancy Pelosi sends her regards to the non-voting "real conservatives".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PDR
It may be a racist refusal to vote for a Mormon

Mormons aren't a "race."

It's tiresome to continue to see this misuse of language, notably by the Left, but even by centrist writers who should know better.

"Bigoted" would be the correct term.

87 posted on 02/16/2007 3:45:47 PM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PDR
It may be a racist refusal to vote for a Mormon...

I was unaware that Mormons were a race. I was also unaware that theological concerns were out of bounds in politics.

88 posted on 02/16/2007 4:23:46 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southernindymom
What is in Newt's past? He was cleared of all the ethics charges brought against him. It's just too bad that the stupid Republicans were too chicken to go to bat for him. They were all scared of their shadows.

You'll get no argument from me. But if he runs, we'll hear the same-o drubbing and parsing of his remarks, see unflattering pictures of him all over the tabloids, read quotes taken out of context, etc. That's what the DBM/MSM are all about. To the left, I doubt there is no one more threatening and dangerous to stopping their agenda in its tracks than Newt Gingrich. For that, they'll throw everything at him, including their kitchen sinks.

89 posted on 02/16/2007 5:53:21 PM PST by demkicker (In the minority or majority, I'll never stop kicking dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: PDR

Newt is undoubtably the most qualified conservative out there to run for President in 2008.

His knowledge and experience over a wide range of issues really transcends the other conservatives in the race, and his 1994 Contract for America campaign shows he has the political smarts.

Yes, the MSM and the liberals will attack him , but I think that Newt can be a winner if he sticks to the issues and take the high road in 08.


90 posted on 02/16/2007 5:57:54 PM PST by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PDR

grow up. stop being so naive.


91 posted on 02/16/2007 8:55:04 PM PST by Mark Felton ("Wisdom is supreme...and though it cost all you have, get understanding" -- Proverbs 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

yes it does explain it. Look at their opponents and consider incumbency. (forget Ford though he was a goof, very unsexy)


92 posted on 02/16/2007 8:57:31 PM PST by Mark Felton ("Wisdom is supreme...and though it cost all you have, get understanding" -- Proverbs 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater
"In their eyes, conservatives are either dumb or evil."

I think you were right, at first...they consider him evil because he is, in fact, brilliant. In a contest of wits between Newt and any of the Democrat hopefuls, Newt would be the prohibitive favorite.
93 posted on 02/16/2007 8:59:22 PM PST by RavenATB (Patton was right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PDR

Bttt!


94 posted on 02/16/2007 9:12:44 PM PST by TheLion (How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PDR
Newt is the ONLY real choice for 2008 anyway..
The others; ALL others; will divide the party even further..

Newt will not win, but he will unify the party..
Hillary is going to win.. I don't like it either but she will..

Expecting republicans to see that and prepare is asking too much..
Republicans are quite dumb..

If republicans DID prepare for the worse they could then hang democrat party objectives around their necks like a millstone.. They won't, even on FR.. They will just throw dust in the air and rend their clothing.. after Hillary is elected..

95 posted on 02/16/2007 9:27:09 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
"The vast number of women have no idea why they vote for who they vote for. Polls all consistently show that they simply vote on emotion and rarely can tell any facts about the person they voted for."

The staggering level of ignorance among Women Voters with regard to National Defense and Foreign Policy Issues has been exhaustively demonstrated by any number of reputable polling organizations. This degree of ignorance should result, in well run polity, in the revocation of the franchise.

Rush Limbaugh has labeled this emotional, superficial approach to the evaluation of Presidential Candidates "the arousal factor". Sometimes this factor works in favor of Conservative candidates as many Women Voters felt "safer" with President Bush in 2004. Obviously the "arousal factor" rules out any number of potentially great Presidents because of a lack of telegenic presence and "warmness" (think of Phil Graham).

If Newt runs I will work for him because I believe him to be visionary leader who has true understanding of the problems and opportunities facing the Country. In that respect, the rest of the GOP field seem like pygmies with all of the other Candidates possessing major flaws.

If Newt does run, however, the "arousal factor" does worry me. Every time I have mentioned Newt in mixed company the issue of his first divorce comes up with the universal conclusion being that Newt was "mean" to his first wife.
96 posted on 02/16/2007 10:46:18 PM PST by ggekko60506
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson