Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
He would have been re-elected in November of 2001 by a wide margin, but if the election were held on 9/10/01 he probably would have lost to any of the front-running Democrats.

People forget that New York City had grown pretty tired of him by September of 2001 -- mainly because his most important achievements dated back several years by that point, and they were being overshadowed by other issues at the time.

23 posted on 02/12/2007 8:19:47 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

There is no way he'd have lost that. The NYers were moaning about the fact that there was no one to replace him, really, except Bloomberg, who no one really wanted.


39 posted on 02/12/2007 8:49:44 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson