Would be interested in seeing the temperature curve from those "American weather satellites" if anybody knows where it is.
1 posted on
02/11/2007 2:45:11 AM PST by
alnitak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: alnitak
2 posted on
02/11/2007 2:53:58 AM PST by
BenLurkin
To: alnitak
3 posted on
02/11/2007 3:07:45 AM PST by
DB
To: alnitak
Oh nonsense! What does he know, he's only a Scientist.
Al Gore told us that he knows for sure!
</s>
4 posted on
02/11/2007 3:14:25 AM PST by
Bon mots
(Nancy Pelosi wants to use 24,000 gallons of fuel per trip to work in her very own C-32!)
To: alnitak
this theory would explain why there has been warming on other planets in our solar system
5 posted on
02/11/2007 3:16:04 AM PST by
wildcatf4f3
(Find out what brand the Ethiopians are drinking and send a case to all my generals.)
To: alnitak
Bump, for later re-reading and printing.
To: alnitak
Great article. Thanks for posting.
I've always theorized (in the last 30 seconds) that global warming is coming fast and furious due to the recent additional appliance, the microwave. Too many people are heating things up. We should ban them. /sarcasm (just my convenient opinion)
7 posted on
02/11/2007 3:30:03 AM PST by
PGalt
To: alnitak
There's nothing new about "the experts" being wrong on environmental issues.
To: alnitak
Would be interested in seeing the temperature curve from those "American weather satellites" if anybody knows where it is.
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/MSU/msusci.html
This chart shows the monthly temperature changes for the lower troposphere - Earth's atmosphere from the surface to 8 km, or 5 miles up. The temperature in this region is more strongly influenced by oceanic activity, particularly the "El Niño" and "La Niña" phenomena, which originate as changes in oceanic and atmospheric circulations in the tropical Pacific Ocean. The overall trend in the tropospheric data is now +0.08 deg. C/decade (through 2004). Click on the charts to get the numerical data.
11 posted on
02/11/2007 4:07:21 AM PST by
ancient_geezer
(Don't reform it, Replace it.)
To: alnitak
My friend said that warm weather makes women "Hotter" then usual..
Dispute her global warming trend!
12 posted on
02/11/2007 4:28:57 AM PST by
MaxMax
(God Bless America)
To: alnitak
a 10% uncertainty in any theory is a wide open breach Which leads to the next series of questions; what other scientific "facts" are at the 90% level of surety? And, are there any standards in the scientific community on how uncertain the truth needs to be before it becomes accepted as fact?
14 posted on
02/11/2007 4:32:38 AM PST by
Bernard
(Immigration should be rare, safe and legal.)
To: alnitak
The best measurements of global air temperatures come from American weather satellites, and they show wobbles but no overall change since 1999. That's an inconvenient truth that will never be reported in the MSM's global warming jihad.
15 posted on
02/11/2007 5:03:42 AM PST by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: alnitak
After long delays in scraping together the funds for an experiment, Svensmark and his small team at the Danish National Space Center hit the jackpot in the summer of 2005. . . . But journal after journal declined to publish their report; the discovery finally appeared in the Proceedings of the Royal Society late last year. "Peer review" has a way of filtering out politically incorrect science, either by limiting funding or by hindering publication.
To: alnitak; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; Mrs. Don-o; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; gruffwolf; ...
Click graphic for full GW rundown
18 posted on
02/11/2007 6:25:24 AM PST by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: alnitak
Why is east Antarctica getting colder? "Where is John Galt?"
Two questions libs don't have the answers for.
21 posted on
02/11/2007 6:49:15 AM PST by
Night Hides Not
(Chuck Hagel is the Republican Joe Biden!)
To: alnitak
Thanks for posting. It seems I heard a senator emphatically say recently that the science on this issue was settle, that our "carbon" print was responsible for global warming.
But, as Rush points out, how can you say there is a consensus on this issue when at least 10% of the scientist disagree, and I say: not to mention another suspected considerable number who are afraid to disagree!
26 posted on
02/11/2007 7:02:01 AM PST by
RAY
(God Bless the USA!)
To: alnitak
"In a box of air in the basement, they were able to show that electrons set free by cosmic rays coming through the ceiling stitched together droplets of sulphuric acid and water."
I built a cloud chamber as a seventh grade science project. So this makes complete sense to me!
To: alnitak
To: alnitak
It is a good sign when the Times of London starts running articles like this. Other papers in the UK tend to follow them and unlike the NYT, they are not a liberal rag.
37 posted on
02/11/2007 9:01:28 AM PST by
Rodney Kings Brain
(The Ghost of Eldridge Cleaver's Crack pipe walks among us...)
To: alnitak
39 posted on
02/11/2007 10:11:55 AM PST by
tubebender
( Everything east of the San Andreas fault will eventually plunge into the Atlantic Ocean...)
To: alnitak
In a box of air in the basement, they were able to show that electrons set free by cosmic rays coming through the ceiling stitched together droplets of sulphuric acid and water. These are the building blocks for cloud condensation. But journal after journal declined to publish their report; the discovery finally appeared in the Proceedings of the Royal Society late last year. Scientism is doing its damndest to be be the neo-fascists of the 21st Century.
40 posted on
02/11/2007 11:22:51 AM PST by
jwalsh07
(Duncan Hunter for President)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson