Posted on 02/10/2007 12:54:12 AM PST by Jim Noble
"What you are now saying, Senator Clinton, you would have left Saddam kept doing what he had been doing since the first Iraq war. You would have preferred that President George W. Bush kept doing what your hushand, President William J. Clinton, had done for 8 years... and all would be well in the world."
If I knew then what I know now...I could make a ton of money on cattle futures!
She's so bent I might actually have to vote for Rudy.
" I voted for the war, but I did not vote for the war". THIS is what people see as leadership?? Rut roh raggie, think we're in trouble.
These are the missing words which they deserve from us, and which we can only give through our representatives in Congress assembled: "to bring the conflict to a successful termination, all of the resources of the country are hereby pledged by the Congress of the United States."
Oops, I forgot to include the rabid demonic weasels thrown in for good measure...
LOL!! The Clinton brand of flip-flopping/rewriting history begins. And a bad job of it she's doing, too. Good.
"Early the next morning, Saturday August 15, Bill woke me up just as he had done months before. This time he didn't sit by the bed, but paced back and forth. He told me for the first time that the situation was much more serious than he had previously acknowledged. He now realized he would have to testify that there had been an inappropriate intimacy. He told me that what happened between them had been brief and sporadic. He couldn't tell me seven months ago, he said, because he was too ashamed to admit it and he knew how angry and hurt I would be."I could hardly breathe. Gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, 'What do you mean? What are you saying? Why did you lie to me?'
"I was furious and getting more so by the second. He just stood there saying over and over again, 'I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. I was trying to protect you and Chelsea.' I couldn't believe what I was hearing. Up until now, I only thought that he'd been foolish for paying attention to the young woman and was convinced he was being railroaded. I couldn't believe he would do anything to endanger our marriage and our family. I was dumbfounded, heartbroken, and outraged that I'd believed him at all."
Excerpts from 'Living History',
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/06/09/book.excerpts/index.html
In the clear light of day, I can see it's another sign (as if any were needed) that Ms. Rodham is a terrible, terrible candidate. If any Democrat is serious about denying her the nomination (I'm not sure that any are), she is serving up boatloads of ammo which can be used to take her apart.
What a nightmare for them, to run with "I voted for the war before I voted against it" again.
"...Clinton stated that her vote for the resolution "is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of pre-emption, or for unilateralism, or FOR THE ARROGANCE OF AMERICAN POWER OR PURPOSE -- all of which carry grave dangers for our nation, for the rule of international law and for the peace and security of people the throughout the world." (emphasis mine)
The arrogance of American power or purpose?
If this woman is ever allowed at the helm, America's military will be nothing more than a forced social experiment and America will have no purpose other than attempting to revive every failed socialist/communist ideology.
I just don't get it. Is this women so detached that she thinks we will believe anything she says? Or is she counting on 33% of the voting public being morons?
Boggles the mind it does...
5.56mm
I can't believe this country has come to this.
That sequence will make a very effective campaign ad.
She's such a fraud.
Both, I think.
She learned from her huge support among Upstate Republican women in 2000 that sometimes it doesn't matter what you say. She drips contempt for ordinary people, and, like a lot of people who made their academic way based on "objective" tests and not actual achievement, she probably does think AT LEAST 33% of the voters are morons.
Her fate now turns on her primary opponents. If Obama or Al Gore wants to beat her, she's not going to make it.
I'm not convinced, however, that Obama is crazy enough to want to be President at this stage of his career. And the others - I'm not sure they want to beat her.
IF she wins the nomination, there's only one Republican who can beat her. And most people here won't vote for him.
So, unless her fellow RATs stop her, I think there's an excellent chance she will be the next President.
Can't let that happen. If she wins, and has a democRAT congress, it will be the makings of a nightmare for our country.
5.56mm
I've gotta agree. As many things as I disagree with him on, if it comes down to him or Her Heinousness, I'm going with Rudy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.