Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble

"...Clinton stated that her vote for the resolution "is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of pre-emption, or for unilateralism, or FOR THE ARROGANCE OF AMERICAN POWER OR PURPOSE -- all of which carry grave dangers for our nation, for the rule of international law and for the peace and security of people the throughout the world." (emphasis mine)

The arrogance of American power or purpose?

If this woman is ever allowed at the helm, America's military will be nothing more than a forced social experiment and America will have no purpose other than attempting to revive every failed socialist/communist ideology.


52 posted on 02/10/2007 5:22:25 AM PST by Hornet19 (Be Politically Erect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hornet19
I think this tops John Kerry's, I voted for it before I voted against it" comment. You know what's so sad about this? Half of America is gonna swallow this hook, line and sinker. Call me a pessimist, but unless the dems really screw up big time between now and the elections, I'm afraid this communist is gonna be the next president of the USA.
53 posted on 02/10/2007 5:28:08 AM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson