Craig Crawford must of really strained his brain coming up with that solution. Surely he jest!
To: AmericanMade1776
Hey Craig, what kind of weed are your smoking?? A little Columbian? Some Maui-wowie? Must be some good stuff. Cheech and Chong would be jealous.
2 posted on
02/09/2007 10:08:01 AM PST by
EagleUSA
To: AmericanMade1776
Why not? Keep 'em on the move and off-balance. Then they don't have time to make mischief.
4 posted on
02/09/2007 10:09:50 AM PST by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: AmericanMade1776
Why don't we send Congress to hell? I'm told it's very near San Francisco.
6 posted on
02/09/2007 10:11:32 AM PST by
Spok
To: AmericanMade1776
Why not a summer home for Congress in Denver?
Sorry we don't want them. We're trying to control global warming here and all that hot air would really screw things up.
My suggestion- Congress goes to DC for a 2-month session and then returns home for the rest of the year. Think of how healthy our country would be.
To: AmericanMade1776
I have a much better idea. Since we have some pretty amazing videoconferencing and "virtual presence" telecommunications systems these days, why not install state-of-the-art systems in the home offices of all senators and representatives and require them to conduct all official business using them? Forbid them from setting foot in DC except for specific ceremonial events for the duration of their legislative time in office.
Would that slow government down? Yup. What's your point? It would also make the legislators more easily accessible to their constituents, and less so to lobbyists. Win-win.
To: AmericanMade1776
I got a better idea why not move Nancy Pelosi.
12 posted on
02/09/2007 10:19:39 AM PST by
bilhosty
(to hell with ABCNNBCBS)
To: AmericanMade1776
I seem to remember a george will column where he proposed moving the capitol every year just so the lobbyists couldn't find it. at least not right away.
the difference was he was kidding.
15 posted on
02/09/2007 10:21:19 AM PST by
smonk
To: AmericanMade1776
Wasn't the original plan for Congress to convene during the sweltering summer months? That was the incentive to get business done and then go home. They were to be near their constituents, families and work (farms, etc.) for the bulk of the year. Keep them where they are and turn off the heating and a/c.
18 posted on
02/09/2007 10:23:02 AM PST by
Ruth A.
(we might as well fight in the first ditch as the last)
To: AmericanMade1776
Why must our current Speaker fly non-stop?
When I was stationed at Tinker AFB, OK in the seventies, we
had government dignitaries (including Barry AuH2O) drop
in for refueling. They were flying on VIP Air Force
aircraft out of Andrews.
Why can't her Nanceness do the same?
To: AmericanMade1776
Make everyone a Beltway insider.Thank you. No.
22 posted on
02/09/2007 10:29:59 AM PST by
Buick 66
To: AmericanMade1776
The MIDWEST would be a sensible location . . .
except for the Yellowstone supervolcano and the New Madrid fault . . .
And Colo Springs is too near NORAD . . .
and . . . welll maybe somewhere in OKLAHOMA?
26 posted on
02/09/2007 11:34:55 AM PST by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson