Don Imus has a Ranch!
Posted on 02/08/2007 8:08:07 AM PST by scottdeus12
MSNBC's Chris Matthews accidentally dropped the F-bomb Wednesday during an appearance on "Imus in the Morning."
The morning radio show is simulcast on MSNBC, and while Matthews' swear word was bleeped on the radio, it made it onto MSNBC while host Don Imus and Matthews were talking about Rudolph Giuliani as a potential president.
"We love good mayors because we love our cities and Giuliani's the city guy," Matthews said. "I'm so sick of Southern guys with ranches running this country. I want a guy to run for president who doesn have a [bleeping] -- I'm sorry -- a ranch. Wouldn't that be good, a guy who wasn't on the ranch during Katrina, he [Giuliani] was on the street corner answering questions [during 9/11]."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
So according to Chrissy, ranch owners have no rights to run the country.
Elitist Jerk.
Matthews is a bottom feeder in every respect. The naughty word he said............he can do that to himself.
Search is our friend....
"Search is our friend...."
And the posting police are not...
Matthews is a bottom feeder in every respect. The naughty word he said............he can do that to himself."
While he literally "feeds" off the efforts of ranchers.
What a hypocrite.
That's twice in one week!!
Well all the Giulianni fans can rejoice... Chris Mathews likes their guy... hooraayyyyyy.. yea...
thud
Chris Matthew is honestly one of the dumbest people on television. He sees things not as a clash of ideology or principles, but purely through the the prism of image and caricature. In other words he revels in the stereotypes without looking at the substance of an argument. I have liberal friends and if they have a reasoned measured argument, I listen and they listen to me. They don't immediately go into "Oh he is a right wing child eater" mode and if they do, they wouldn't be friends for long. But for simpletons like Matthews the world is seen in those terms. So when it suits him, he likes the southern cowboys but then he likes the Catholic mayor. Not one word about the guys positions or beliefs.
The jerk didn't even place in the cable news race this month.
LOL, Imus musta loved the ranch comment.
Dubious honor for Rudy. Chris Matthews says he's the guy.
To me, that says he's the guy to avoid!
And we had to settle for a southern peanut farmer as President one time.
To those with peanut allergy, Jimmy Carter is a merchant of death. You don't hear that in the MSM!
Stop pinging me.
If you keep pinging me, I'll keep remind people of things they'd rather forget.
Matthews is probably hoping that Rudy won't sign as many gun limiting bills as Reagan did.
It was Governor Ronald Reagan of California who signed the Mulford Act in 1967, "prohibiting the carrying of firearms on one's person or in a vehicle, in any public place or on any public street." The law was aimed at stopping the Black Panthers, but affected all gun owners.
Twenty-four years later, Reagan was still pushing gun control. "I support the Brady Bill," he said in a March 28, 1991 speech, "and I urge the Congress to enact it without further delay."
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=3605
The import of some shotguns was prohibited by President Reagan?
The 1994 "assault weapons" ban will sunset in 2004 unless Congress re-authorizes it. All those firearms that were banned because of their appearance (and because they didn't meet arbitrary, bureaucratically defined, and highly changeable "sporting purpose" criteria) are scheduled to become legal to manufacture again. All those magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds will be legal to manufacture again. It will once again be legal to import the group of shotguns administratively banned by Ronald Reagan and the group of semi-automatic rifles similarly banned by the first President Bush. (Both of these executive bans were codified in the 1994 law.)
http://www.jpfo.org/alert20021007.htm
Since the KABA poll was released, additional information has resurfaced concerning President Reagan’s support for the 1994 “assault weapon” ban: “Kenneth J. Cooper & Ann Devroy, Backers of Assault Weapons Ban Make Final Push for Undecided Votes, WASH. POST, May 5, 1994, at A5. Former Presidents Gerald R. Ford, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan announced their support of the ban in a letter.”
With this clear evidence of Mr. Reagan supporting the Brady Bill, a ban on shotguns and semiautos, and a ban on carrying firearms in public, it seems fair to ask:
Why is NRA republishing their 1983 resolution (issued, incidentally, 16 years after he signed the Mulford Act) where they proclaimed “President Reagan has forcefully stood by his convictions in support of the second amendment right of citizens to keep and bear arms for any legitimate purpose, including self-defense; and…vigorously rejects the myth that gun control is crime control…”?
http://keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=2955
Explains the Mulford Act:
http://publicola.mu.nu/archives/2004/06/16/who_can_gun_owners_trust.html
Hmmmm....do I see a rehab coming? I mean, you just don't DO that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.