Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nathan Zachary

Man I know this link is like, all the way on the top of the page. But you could still read it.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=42307
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=31783

I should say it amend to say it is 100% to HPV 6, 11 and 16. It is 99.9% to HPV 18 at a young ages and lost .8% efficacy in the above 16 age group. It loses efficacy the older the vaccine recipient is.

The level of HPV antibodies (and thus level of immunity) remained the same or higher after 5 years.

These efficacy rates are significantly lower than most vaccines. The measles vaccine, for example, is only 90% effective.


146 posted on 02/06/2007 11:35:08 AM PST by Sols
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Sols

Plus, there isn't any PROOF that Gardisol prevents anything actualy. The study isn't old enough to be conclusive. None of it's virgin test patients are even old enough to develop cervical cancer, and won't be for years to come. Plus with all the check ups they get, they probably never will.


153 posted on 02/06/2007 11:47:17 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson