Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rights-AND-Responsibilities

The .308/7.62 NATO is the .30-06's ballistic twin.

And the M-14 *is* an updated Garand-type already. The BM-*59* (the 58 was the prototype) is largely pointless.


75 posted on 02/02/2007 1:03:56 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

Beg to differ - the .308 is not a ballistic twin of the 30-06. The issue is downrange stopping power - similar, but the 30-06 could "make a long-distance call" with more authority than the .308 could.
Part of the advantage the .308 had was that the weapon would be lighter & combat load would be less for an equal (and "equivilant" firepower) ammo load. The .308 is a shorter cartridge, thus smaller receiver.


104 posted on 02/02/2007 1:18:45 PM PST by Rights-AND-Responsibilities
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson