To: tfelice
Rudy v Hillary - Rudy loses all 50 states because a pro-life candidate will run third party and take away those votes. Like when Buchanan ran 3rd party in 2000? LOL!
You are so wrong. Your pro-life stance doesn't get you as much mileage as you think.
38 posted on
02/02/2007 11:02:15 AM PST by
Lunatic Fringe
(Yeah, yeah... my FReeper name is quite approriate, come up with something new.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Like when Buchanan ran 3rd party in 2000? LOL!
Bush ran strongly on pro-life, pro-family, pro-2A themes and was endorsed by all the major groups.
How do you think Rudy will fare in those areas?
Never mind, I'll answer my own question. He'll be dead meat.
55 posted on
02/02/2007 11:09:26 AM PST by
Antoninus
( Who is Duncan Hunter? Find out....www.gohunter08.com)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Like when Buchanan ran 3rd party in 2000? LOL!
Bush was not a pro-abortion candidate - Rudy on the other hand has an utter disregard for human life. Add to that fact is his unwavering support for sodomites and you have a candidate that is detestable to most Evangelical Christians and conservative Catholics.
73 posted on
02/02/2007 11:19:26 AM PST by
tfelice
To: Lunatic Fringe
"You are so wrong. Your pro-life stance doesn't get you as much mileage as you think."
Yes it does... If you strip out all of the pro-life voters since Roe/Wade, IKE would have been our last Republican president...
118 posted on
02/02/2007 11:50:02 AM PST by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson