You said: "You're wrong."
I recommend you delete this phrase from your vocabulary. It only makes you look bad.
In the matter of climate there are so many variables that no one can be certain of what future temperatures might be. They might be warmer. They might be cooler. We don't know. We observe the data and make our best forecast. It is too early for you to announce that you are right.
My point is that we don't have to prove that global warming isn't occurring in order to debunk the left's proposed remedies. EVEN IF GLOBAL WARMING IS OCCURRING IT CAN BE OFFSET WITHOUT DESTROYING THE ECONOMY OR EMPOWERING A NANNY STATE.
Obviously, it makes me look bad in your eyes. Maybe some others in the Peanut Gallery will put forth their opinions on this matter?
Now you are implying that I made some comment about "future temperatures." You're wrong about this too. It is the globalwarmingcrowd that speaks with certainty about what the future temperatures will be just as they predicted global cooling 30 years ago. (and also the calamities these temperatures will bring). In fact my comments really were about temperatures in the recent past which must have declined during these years for there to be more ice in more places than there had formerly been. I pointed out that they declined because the globalwarmingcrowd has suggested like a magician waving his hand, that more ice in the ocean somehow indicates that temperatures have been rising. They're wrong too. You have company.
ML/NJ
(EVEN IF GLOBAL WARMING IS OCCURRING IT CAN BE OFFSET WITHOUT DESTROYING THE ECONOMY OR EMPOWERING A NANNY STATE.)
In a nutshell, this is all I am trying to say. Carbon based fuel is dumb, dirty and outdated. There has to be a sane approach to combating this.