Columbo already knows it was his left :-)
Posted on 02/02/2007 3:49:53 AM PST by 8mmMauser
I don't know about anyone else, but I am still waiting for Michael Schiavo to make a correction on his blog about what "actually" took place in Colorado when he went there (to the debate) to supposedly ask Congresswoman Musgrave one question and she and her staff supposedly tried to have him removed. He called it, "My unreal night in Colorado - with radio link" (Thu Oct 26, 2006 at 08:05:14 PM PST). I'll say (from what I read) that it was his "unreal night".
As I said before in "Standing up and Admitting a Mistake: Not Schiavo's Style?", if four uniformed officers were around my seat, I would have some idea of what was going on. I certainly wouldn't be sitting in "duh mode" to only be told later of what took place right there around me, as Michael suggests he was. If Michael's account is realistic -- his response and reaction is not. Nor is his response appropriate now that he has "learned" what he was "allegedly told" is not what took place. One would think if he can't get the words out that he was mistaken, he could at least have removed the inaccurate entry from his blog.
He has done neither.
I'm also still waiting to read about, "Also, maybe tomorrow I'll post about my election-eve rally with Bill Clinton in Florida." (A real election impact by Michael Schiavo, Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 10:40:34 AM PST). Indeed, I would love to read that story by Michael, since I read it was not possible. Not if he was implying it was the Bill Clinton that is the former President of the United States. Will be interesting to see what he says about that if he ever does.
If Michael couldn't get it straight what happened at the Musgrave debate or even if he spent election-eve with former President Bill Clinton -- do you suppose he might have gotten Terri Schiavo's wishes mixed-up as well? (He does claim to have a bad memory from what I read.) Makes one wonder. At least makes me wonder. Whatever...
I'm still waiting for the corrections if not the explanations!
Carrie Hutchens is a former law enforcement officer and a freelance writer who is active in fighting against the death culture movement and the injustices within the judicial and law enforcement systems.
>> the freedom to make our own health care decisions implies that we have moral obligations and duties, one of which is to be certain that we are using all the "ordinary" or "proportionate" interventions necessary to maintain our life and health. To put it simply, those medical treatments, medications, and procedures that offer reasonable hope to protect and preserve life without grave burden to oneself or another are ordinary care, and are required as part of our duty to care for ourselves.
Yeah, they found it in the penumbra of the emanations of the enumerated assumed pseudo-powers implied by paragraph 8,611 of the interstate commerce act, as interpreted by Fred Blypho, a clerk.
Oh, I saw it all right. That's why I groused about it :-) C'mon, on top of all that, it's in small print.
Well I didn't know all that. Okay, sounds legit. Everybody go home now.
Stop yelling!
Tagline practice :-)
Tag times continued.
Tagline practice, ongoing
Columbo already knows it was his left :-)
Driver faces new charge in fatal 1996 crash
By Mike Cruz, Staff Writer
02/09/2007SAN BERNARDINO - Florence Thompson was on her way home from work at Sears in 1996, when another vehicle crossed into her lane on Kendall Drive and slammed head-on into her car.
There were sounds of revving engines and a car racing with a truck on the rain-slicked road just before the crash, witnesses told police. Thompson survived but remained in a vegetative state for a decade.
Now, Monty Lyle Gill, of Rialto, the driver of the other vehicle in the crash, will be held to answer a charge of vehicular manslaughter, a judge ruled Thursday in San Bernardino Superior Court.
Thompson, 53, died in April after she was removed from life-support systems. Prosecutors subsequently filed the felony charge - 10 years after the April 1996 crash and after Gill had already pleaded no contest to a lesser charge in the case.
~ snip ~
She was removed from "life-support systems" on March 29, and died eight days later on April 6. In other words, her husband (Michael 
) had her starved and dehydrated to death about a year after Terri Schiavo, who suffered the same fate from March 18 to 31, 2005. Now the person who caused the injuries which made her vulnerable to her killers, is being charged with her unlawful killing.
DA reopening 10-year-old case ~ 04/07/2006Woman hit in 1996 by racing car dies ~ 04/08/2006
A beautiful job of drawing the needed distinctions!
Which, this one? I just rattled off four new ones. (And edited this one a bit, too :-) )
Michael* starves and dehydrates his wife to death, but blames her death on the man who caused the injuries that made her vulnerable to being killed by her husband. "Look what he made me do to my wife!"
* Thompson, not Schiavo this time.
This idiot reporter never tells us about Thompson's injuries, never tells us if she was dehydrated to death and never has a glimmer that somebody else killed her. The D.A. is not far ahead of the reporter in intelligence. Between the two of them, they don't add up to the brains of a chicken.
Chickens are way smarter than that. When they see other chickens getting killed, they know enough to be afraid, even before anyone reaches for their neck.
>> “He told me, 'Mike, she's gone. It's all up to you. I can't tell you what to do, but I can assure you, you are not committing a murder. You are allowing her to slip into the hands of the Lord.'”
Translation: Mike killed her. Editorial: the pastor is a frock-head.
Now they are going to ask the M.E. if the accident injuries killed her.
I stand corrected.
His pastor is obviously one of those new-age whack jobs who supports the sin instead of ministering to the sinner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.