Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elderly Man Dies In Gunfire Exchange With Undercover Officers
News4Jax.com ^ | January 28th, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 01/30/2007 1:12:56 PM PST by FreedomCalls

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- An elderly man is dead and two Jacksonville Sheriff's Office detectives are on administrative leave after an undercover narcotics investigation ended in gunfire late Saturday.

According to the JSO, detectives Donald Maynard and James Narcisse had been working undercover for about three hours in the 2300 block of Westmont Street when 80-year-old Isaac Singletary approached them with a gun just before 6 p.m.

The officers said they ordered the man to put down the gun. However, Singletary did not drop his weapon and gunshots were exchanged.

Singletary was shot several times. Paramedics rushed him to Shands-Jacksonville Medical Center, where he died.

Less than 24 hours after the fatal police shooting left his uncle dead, Gary Evans told Channel 4 he's mad.

"Eighty-years-old, and they had to shoot him twice or more in order to subdue him. I'm very upset about it," Evans said.

He said his uncle was territorial and mad about the drugs on his street, and would often take his gun and try to scare the drug dealers away.

On Saturday, things went terribly wrong.

"My uncle asked the officer, which he didn't know at the time he was a police officer, to leave his property and he didn't," Evans said.

Neighbors told Channel 4 that Singletary was very protective of his property.

"You don't expect somebody to come pointing a gun at you, and once they do that, the officers will tell them to drop the gun," JSO Chief Dwain Senterfitt said. "We're still investigating what statements were made, but obviously, at that point, the officers' lives were in danger."

Police said they are still trying to figure out if the undercover officers had time to tell Singletary they were undercover officers. They said the detectives had to hid behind a tree to avoid being shot by Singletary.

According to police, the officers had been in the neighborhood since about 2:45 p.m., and had made five drug-related arrests.

"In the course of our undercover activity and making several arrests in this neighborhood, a man we now know to be a resident of that area, Mr. Isaac Singletary, was shot by officers," said Director of Investigations and Homeland Security Micheal Edwards.

Saturday's shooting was the third JSO-involved shooting in three weeks. Unlike last week's case at the Sable Palm Apartments, there is no dispute whether Singletary had a gun.

"There was a confrontation between them and an exchange of gunfire," Edwards said.

However, the question of who fired the first shot remains unanswered.

"He shot at my uncle first. He was the first one to shoot, and my uncle returned fire," Evans said.

"As you know, our investigation into any shooting must be thorough and methodical. At this time, there's a limited amount of information we can share," Edwards said.

As the details of the shooting are being hashed out, scared neighbors and sad family members remember Singletary.

"I looked in his eyes I saw his pain. I felt the pain for him. He never bothered anybody. He's never done anything to anybody. He didn't want anybody in his yard," said neighbor Antionette Douglas.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: addictedleroy; donutwatch; drugwar; guns; police; shooting; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-222 next last
To: rogue yam
You do not have sufficient information to reasonably conclude that the force was excessive or that the citizen was innocent.

Let's see, he's DEAD. that's pretty excessive.

Citizen innocent? Innocent of what? He was defending his property.

The cops, had they had half a brain should have just LEFT. Since when is a drug bust worth more than a citizen's life?

141 posted on 01/31/2007 8:15:29 AM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

realized the flimsyness of your argument, huh? loitering on private property does not warrant brandishing a firearm, imo. if you do, at least take some cover. this guy had bad tactics if he was trying to get into a gun fight in which he was outnumbered. again, your "castle doctrine" doesn't pass the smell test. but neither of us was there so all we can do is monday morning quarterback.


142 posted on 01/31/2007 8:29:53 AM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
realized the flimsyness of your argument, huh? loitering on private property does not warrant brandishing a firearm, imo

Well thank God you're not in the legislature or courts.

143 posted on 01/31/2007 8:37:28 AM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

Fair enough then. Cops have just as much right to defend themselves as anyone else.

It's absolutely amazing to me, how some can live to a ripe old age without picking up one smidgen of wisdom along the way.


144 posted on 01/31/2007 8:45:51 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Fear of offending those rabidly determined to destroy you, is good manners turned malignant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
realized the flimsyness of your argument, huh?

Hardly.

I am a local. You are not.

I possess a Florida CCW, and so am familiar with our laws concerning the application of deadly force. You are not.

I am familiar with, and associated with, the news organization that reported the story in the first place. You are not.

I know what I'm talking about. You do not.

loitering on private property does not warrant brandishing a firearm, imo.

Does "loitering" encourage drug solicitation...five times?

...your "castle doctrine" doesn't pass the smell test.

I submit your ability to "smell" is compromised by the location of your head.

145 posted on 01/31/2007 8:50:50 AM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
I personally have believed from the get go that the war on drugs was, is and always will be, the most disastrous , costly in terms of human lives lost and/or shattered and in tax-dollars flushed down the toilet of stupidity,and sadly self inflicted (potentially lethal)(suicidal?) wound, this country has ever suffered.

Despite the stupidity of the fools who declared the war on drugs in the first place and the jackasses who still wage it with all the rabid zeal of jihadist's in heat, this old timer was still way out of line. Whether the trespassers were cops or crooks and if a war on terror did not exist, you can't use lethal force against people you suspect to be pi$$ing on your prize winning roses.

You do have the right to call 911,turn off the interior lights, arm yourself with every weapon you own and blow away any and all who kick down your door and storm into your home without identifying themselves.
146 posted on 01/31/2007 9:51:19 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Fear of offending those rabidly determined to destroy you, is good manners turned malignant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
You do have the right to call 911,turn off the interior lights, arm yourself with every weapon you own and blow away any and all who kick down your door and storm into your home without identifying themselves.

Florida law does not require one to cower within the confines of one's home when facing a potential threat to life and limb, neither one's own, nor others.

147 posted on 01/31/2007 10:39:47 AM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
The cops should have had their supervisor contact the man first and get his permission to use his property. They would first have to ascertain that the old man wasn't part of the drug culture on that street or protecting an involved younger family member, which would have been easy to do.

You are joking aren't you? That would infer that these were professional officers and knew what they were doing. :)

148 posted on 01/31/2007 10:54:17 AM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
This post is 100% cynical, 100% unintelligent and 100% worthless.

I agree, it is almost as good as some of your writings.

149 posted on 01/31/2007 10:56:35 AM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
the officers had been in the neighborhood since about 2:45 p.m.

How many square miles in a neighborhood?? Does that mean they had been a mile away , two miles away, a half mile away. Had been in neighborhood is a meaningless statement.

150 posted on 01/31/2007 11:05:55 AM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
You do have the right to call 911,turn off the interior lights, arm yourself with every weapon you own and blow away any and all who kick down your door and storm into your home without identifying themselves.

Now that I think about it, with the possible implications of Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law, these police officers might by subject to a charge of plain old murder.

151 posted on 01/31/2007 11:16:52 AM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

She may have been "carrying." I agree that whoever did it was "acting like a cop. . ."


152 posted on 01/31/2007 11:44:34 AM PST by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Whether the trespassers were cops or crooks and if a war on terror did not exist, you can't use lethal force against people you suspect to be pi$$ing on your prize winning roses.

that a nice load of horse$#!@ you have there. The rules change when you get to Texas and Florida. Lethal force against trespassers is most certainly authorized. you may not like, but so what?

You do have the right to call 911,turn off the interior lights, arm yourself with every weapon you own and blow away any and all who kick down your door and storm into your home without identifying themselves.

Some people prefer to be self reliant and use the cops for their proper functions, mainly deterrence and record-keeping.

The cops should have LEFT the property. Just because you have a tin star doesn't give you the right to crap all over people's property rights.

153 posted on 01/31/2007 12:10:11 PM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

I agree the information is sketchy, but it seems clear to me that the old man didn't know or didn't trust who they were, which was the heart of what led to the shooting. That could have been alleviated by the department letting him know ahead of time that they would be there.


154 posted on 01/31/2007 12:30:27 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

That's a valid point. I'm not a big fan of undercover cops. They should be in uniform or conspicuously display a badge while on duty. I can certainly see going out to confront what you expect are drug dealers, and they tell you to drop their gun. Even if they said they were police, (I don't think the story said they identified themselves though.) once a situation escalates to pointing weapons, there is a good chance someone is going to get shot.


155 posted on 01/31/2007 12:39:07 PM PST by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
If you really believed that horse hockey you are spewing, you would already be serving life, for blowing away the UPS man or the pizza delivery guy or a Jehovah's witness or the paper boy or a trick or treater or a member of your family arriving home later than expected. Or sitting on death row for shooting a neighbor's dog for sh*tting in your yard.

It has been my experience that the tougher people talk anonymously, the wimpier they are in the real world.
156 posted on 01/31/2007 1:05:28 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Fear of offending those rabidly determined to destroy you, is good manners turned malignant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
It has been my experience that the tougher people talk anonymously, the wimpier they are in the real world.

It's been my experience that United States Marines are tough no matter how they talk.

157 posted on 01/31/2007 1:08:09 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
If you really believed that horse hockey you are spewing, you would already be serving life, for blowing away the UPS man or the pizza delivery guy or a Jehovah's witness or the paper boy or a trick or treater or a member of your family arriving home later than expected. Or sitting on death row for shooting a neighbor's dog for sh*tting in your yard.

Funny, I believe the same horse hockey he is spewing and I'm not in prision either.

I wonder at what point we get to conclude you are talking out of your hat and have no business offering an opinion regarding Texas or Florida law. Further, that your inclination when predicting human behavior is decidedly liberal.

158 posted on 01/31/2007 1:17:41 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Maybe, but IMHO it seems unlikely. The law of survival should rule when two armed people face off, and go in favor of the survivor.Everything else being equal of course.
159 posted on 01/31/2007 1:20:31 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Fear of offending those rabidly determined to destroy you, is good manners turned malignant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
If you really believed that horse hockey you are spewing, you would already be serving life, for blowing away the UPS man or the pizza delivery guy or a Jehovah's witness or the paper boy or a trick or treater or a member of your family arriving home later than expected. Or sitting on death row for shooting a neighbor's dog for sh*tting in your yard.

Do you want to take a crack at explaining this a little better or just let your idiocy stand at rest?

Read more on the story. He told them to leave twice. they refused. He came back to defend his property. and make no mistake. After dark in Texas, you can kill trespassers.

And yes I have defended my property after dark with lethal force. The good news is that they LEFT (kinda the cops should have done) before I had to pull the trigger.

160 posted on 01/31/2007 1:24:38 PM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson