Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Newport News Commanding Officer Relieved of Command
Navy Newsstand ^ | 1/29/2007 12:56:00 PM | U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/ U.S. 5th Fleet Public Affairs

Posted on 01/29/2007 10:45:57 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

BAHRAIN (NNS) -- Rear Adm. Douglas J. McAneny, commander, Combined Task Force 54, completed administrative personnel actions involving select members of the USS Newport News (SSN 750) crew, Jan. 29, including relieving Cmdr. Matthew A. Weingart of command due to a lack of confidence in his ability to command. Capt. Norman B. Moore has temporarily assumed command of the Los Angeles-class fast attack submarine.

Following a collision between Newport News and M/V Mogamigawa, Jan. 8, the submarine pulled into port in Bahrain where it is currently undergoing a damage inspection and assessment, to be followed by temporary repairs. The submarine will return to the United States once temporary repairs are complete at which time permanent repairs will be conducted. Legal and safety mishap investigations are in progress.

No U.S. Sailors or merchant crew members were injured in the collision.

For related news, visit the Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/Commander, U.S. 5th Fleet Navy NewsStand page at www.news.navy.mil/local/cusnc/.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Non-Sequitur
Yes, my mistake please see post #20.

Salute.
21 posted on 01/29/2007 11:23:42 AM PST by poobear (Carter & Clinton - 'The Latter Day Church Of Jew Haters & Horndogs')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: poobear

Easy misread to make...I do believe there's a lot of placating the Japanese going on here.


22 posted on 01/29/2007 11:24:24 AM PST by JRios1968 (Tagline wanted...inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Keyga8tor

Have you lost your mind? Worse than Pearl? Not even close.

This collision was in the Straits of Hormuz - which is a nasty passage but nowhere near as narrow as Pearl. What makes Hormuz so difficult is all the danged Omani and Iranian gun boats in the way.

The Bahrain approach is narrow - but again, not as bad as Pearl. As long as 5th Fleet keeps track of that shifting sand bar near the green daymarker it's pretty straight forward and can be done in varying tide conditions.

Pearl is a 2-window per day animal - and if you want daylight it comes back to once a day - and you've got to hope your skipper has enough seniority to get a good slot because it can get plenty busy on a Friday afternoon. I've seen more than 1 ship miss the tides because they were too far down the list.


23 posted on 01/29/2007 11:35:47 AM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Unfortunately, this is SOP. I have no doubt that the former Skipper is an outstanding man, but he knew the job was dangerous when he took it....


24 posted on 01/29/2007 11:37:09 AM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

yeah...The guy who gets really screwed is the XO, an LCDR with 14-15 and doesn't have a prayer of making 20.


25 posted on 01/29/2007 11:44:46 AM PST by tomcorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

Pearl doesn't have 18-20 Million barrels of oil a day transiting either.


26 posted on 01/29/2007 11:47:35 AM PST by tomcorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
>>>...web bio says he was relieved in March 2005,<<<

Read it again - he relieved someone else. There was no was in the sentence!

27 posted on 01/29/2007 11:52:30 AM PST by HardStarboard (The Democrats are more afraid of American Victory than Defeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer

If it's really that dangerous, then transiting the SOH while submerged is nuts. Our subs should SURFACE when transiting the SOH.

Perhaps this accident will force that sensible change.


28 posted on 01/29/2007 11:54:19 AM PST by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer; Keyga8tor

I know getting your ship or sub dinged is a no no, but we shouldn't relieve captains or commanders who otherwise are competent. Otherwise, all the remaining officers will become overcautious and that is not a good mindset when the real bad times of incoming bullets and bombs start.


29 posted on 01/29/2007 12:05:18 PM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
If it's really that dangerous, then transiting the SOH while submerged is nuts. Our subs should SURFACE when transiting the SOH.

That lets your opponent know the sub's there. Kind of defeats the purpose.

30 posted on 01/29/2007 12:09:15 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
That lets your opponent know the sub's there. Kind of defeats the purpose.

No kidding. Got to wonder what sort of surveillance assets the Iranians have deployed along the straight. I'm sure their buddies the Russians have helped out there.....

31 posted on 01/29/2007 12:16:57 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

The D.C. suburbs, and elsewhere, are filled with good military people who caught an unlucky break.


32 posted on 01/29/2007 12:29:58 PM PST by jblair (Son of a Wild Weasel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

"If it's really that dangerous, then transiting the SOH while submerged is nuts. Our subs should SURFACE when transiting the SOH. "

Yeah, it is nuts going through there submerged.

That is what subs do. Their purpose is to remain hidden and not let the bad guys know where they are. On the surface, some raghead in a speedboat with an RPG can compromise the boat's ability to complete its mission.

Someone somewhere has done all the risk assessments and decided that submerged is best. Its the individual boat skipper that has to carry out that order, placing his career on the line.


33 posted on 01/29/2007 1:18:58 PM PST by NOLA_homebrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer

Maybe those risk assessments should be reassessed. I've always questioned the value of sub deployments in the shallow Persian Gulf anyway. Maybe for something like a commando raid -- maybe. But I don't see much point for anything other than that. Subs can fire Tomahawks from outside the SOH, and we sure don't need them to sink ships in the confined waters of the Gulf; aircraft can do that.


34 posted on 01/29/2007 1:51:51 PM PST by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

BUMP!


35 posted on 01/29/2007 1:54:44 PM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

To All,
My bad! I thought the collision occured in the transit into Bahrain. SOH is bad (traffic) but Malacca is much worse. Thanks to all for the correction.


36 posted on 01/29/2007 5:45:31 PM PST by Keyga8tor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson