To: samantha
I disagree with you on Hunter. I think he could be a good CIC,as could Rudy. I still have one goal---not Hillary.
I am ready and willing to support whomever we choose(I just hope it ain't McCain however).Problem is we need to remember that we really don't elect a President. Neither do the lib rats, it's the squishy middle that gets the job done.The independents. Like it or not that's how politics are these days. We had many shots since 41 to make the Republican party more conservative and we blew each and every one. That's why so many people kept(and still are) dropping out. Not wanting anything to do with the rats we have a huge independent group that now nominates the next president.
772 posted on
01/28/2007 5:06:00 PM PST by
rodguy911
(Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
To: rodguy911
Being a Good Commander in Chief is not the same as being responsible for all the Rest of the Federal employees, and the entire Country. I have no doubt that Hunter would be fine in that Position, but that is not all there is to it. Military People can take orders and have the best interest of the Country at Heart, I have my Doubts about the Civilians in Particular the Leakers in the State Dept, etc. They have been there under Civil Service, it makes herding cats seem easy.
798 posted on
01/28/2007 6:14:04 PM PST by
samantha
(The New Media fighting the DBM for our Sanity, Survival ,Soldiers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson