Lying to the committee is covered under F.
Nifong hasn't been ordered to make restitution yet.
Regardless of who stepped forward to help them, they still have competent representation. The resources affording that representation don't have to be their resources. The question is did/do they have it? Yes, they do.
I see on lying being covered under F.
As far as restitution, aggrevating circumstance would be before anyone was ordered to pay restitution. It would be a matter of showing willingness to make good. Of course this is probably meant more for cases were lawyers have looted estates or similar financial ethical violations.