I see on lying being covered under F.
As far as restitution, aggrevating circumstance would be before anyone was ordered to pay restitution. It would be a matter of showing willingness to make good. Of course this is probably meant more for cases were lawyers have looted estates or similar financial ethical violations.
Well, partly. But it usually means that the lawyer was ordered to make restitution as part of a previous sanction from the bar, and didn't do it. But yes, I think it also means that if a lawyer misappropriates monies from his trust account, comingles, overbills, bilks a client into gifting the lawyer money or property, bills for services not actually provided, or refuses to refund unused fees, those kinds of violations would be the basis for a complaint, and would occur before a disciplinary order was entered against the lawyer.
I really don't see how it would apply in this case.
Paying some restitution before a disciplinary action is commenced could be a mitigating factor, I would think, unless it was paid as a result of an administrative decision entered after forcing the client/victim into some sort of arbitration.