Skip to comments.
In need of help to a question about a proposed bill regarding Valerie Plame
thomas.loc.gov ^
| Jan 17, 2006
Posted on 01/17/2007 2:18:46 PM PST by Mo1
This was just brought to my attention and I need help in understanding what exactly this Bill/Amendment is about.
I tried calling over to the House of Representatives .. but they said there was no one there to help explain the details of this bill/amendment.
They suggested I go to Thomas.gov .. but I already did that.
Can any FReepers out there help direct me in the right direction and find a better way to locate what this is?
Thanks !
------------------------------------
H.R.501
Title: For the relief of Valerie Plame Wilson.
Sponsor: Rep Inslee, Jay [WA-1] (introduced 1/16/2007) Cosponsors (None) Private bill
Latest Major Action: 1/16/2007 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).
SUMMARY AS OF:
1/16/2007--Introduced. Provides for the relief of Valerie Plame Wilson.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: congress; earmarks; personalporkbarrel; plame; pork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: DBrow
Based on the above service and your resignation on January 9, 2006, your estimated deferred annuity is $21,541.00 per year, or $1795 per month, beginning at age 56. A pittance. This will never keep her in the style she's become accustomed.
41
posted on
01/17/2007 2:35:39 PM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Peach
That is what I first thought! That will not pay for her buggy sunglasses & flowing scarves!
42
posted on
01/17/2007 2:36:49 PM PST
by
tiredoflaundry
(Where did I park my car????? Oh no!)
To: Howlin
yea I know
But put that aside for a second
She's trying to get congress to pull a favor for her so that she can collect her pension early
What was that Gramma Pelose was saying?
43
posted on
01/17/2007 2:36:55 PM PST
by
Mo1
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC AND DONATE)
To: thackney
Just one word..............
NO !
Valerie "deserves" NOTHING and especially NO special treatment!
To: thackney
Don't she and her husband Joe have a lot to do with the fact that she's unemployed? Or are we going to blame that on the White House, too?
To: Mo1
Can we all say "culture of corruption is upon us?"
46
posted on
01/17/2007 2:38:26 PM PST
by
onyx
(DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
To: thackney
This is complete and utter BS... I suppose our 80 or so RINO's will vote with the dems for this???
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping, Howlin!
To: DBrow
BTTT
To: Peach; Howlin; Mo1; onyx
The next thing, Joe Wilson will be filing for compensation or suing for damages somewhere "because of the emotional pain he suffered when Val was outted". Co-plaintant.
And since the taxpayers have footed Fitzpatrick's Fun House all these months, it's not inconceivable that somehow we'll end up financially supporting two democrat liars.
Make that two MORE democrat liars.
50
posted on
01/17/2007 2:41:03 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(I support the troops AND THE MISSION. I do not support Clintoons, RINOS or RATS.)
To: onyx
Yea .. something like that
51
posted on
01/17/2007 2:41:30 PM PST
by
Mo1
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC AND DONATE)
To: Howlin
This IS obscene!
Thanks for the head's up. All of us need to start calling and writing letters......................NOW.
To: Old Professer
I hope that you are right about that!
To: popdonnelly
They sure did. There is no reason to give her early pension, after all it was Joe WIlson that listed her as his wife long before they found a way to blame the Bush administration for her so-called 'outing.'
To: prairiebreeze; Mo1
OMG -- I'll wager you're right.
55
posted on
01/17/2007 2:43:20 PM PST
by
onyx
(DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
To: Mo1
INTRODUCTION OF THE VALERIE PLAME WILSON COMPENSATION ACT -- (Extensions of Remarks - January 16, 2007)
[Page: E118]
---
SPEECH OF
HON. JAY INSLEE
OF WASHINGTON
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2007
- Mr. INSLEE. Madam Speaker, I rise today to bring to the attention of Congress one of the human impacts caused by the indiscretion of government officials regarding the covert identity of Central Intelligence Agency operative Valerie Plame Wilson.
- As nearly every American knows, and as most of the world has heard, the covert CIA identity of Valerie Plame Wilson was exposed to the public as part of an Administration response to a critical op-ed published in the New York Times by Mrs. Plame Wilson's husband, Joe Wilson.
- The national security ramifications for this act have been discussed thoroughly on this floor, in the news media, and I am quite certain behind CIA's closed doors. Today I intend to call my colleagues' attention to the human toll that this ``outing'' has had on one, often overlooked, individual. That person is Valerie Plame Wilson.
- While the media, Congress, and the judiciary have gone to great lengths to discuss the impact of this unfortunate act on politicians, bureaucrats, agents in the field, and the suspected perpetrators of the outing, few have looked at the impact that the outing has had on Mrs. Plame Wilson and her family.
- On July 14, 2003, Mrs. Plame Wilson's professional life was forever altered, and her CIA career irrevocably ruined by the syndicated publication of a column, which revealed Mrs. Plame Wilson's identity as a covert CIA officer. Since this time, numerous reports on Mrs. Plame Wilson's personal history have surfaced
[Page: E119]
in the press, official government documents, and by government officials.
- Following the initial outing in the media, Mrs. Plame Wilson's future as a covert CIA operative ceased to exist and her career of two decades was destroyed. On January 9, 2006, Mrs. Plame Wilson resigned from the CIA, recognizing that any future with the Agency would not include any work for which she had been highly trained. For these reasons, and under these distressing conditions, Mrs. Plame Wilson voluntarily resigned from the Agency.
- Despite Mrs. Plame Wilson's 20 years of federal service, she does not meet the minimum age requirement to receive her retirement annuity. She has been left without a career.
- I am introducing legislation to allow Mrs. Plame Wilson to qualify for her annuity, as one who has served her country for two decades, and waive the age requirement for collecting it. To best demonstrate the annuity for which Mrs. Plame Wilson may qualify if this legislation were to pass, I am submitting for the record a document sent to Mrs. Plame Wilson by the CIA. It outlines her deferred annuity and testifies to 20 years of service. The document bears no indications of classified material as required by CIA procedures, and was sent via regular postal mail after Mrs. Plame Wilson was no longer in the employ of the CIA. Legal experts have assured me that this is not a classified document.
- I believe that this is one small measure to help send a message that we must stand up for public service officers, such as Mrs. Plame Wilson, who have been treated wrongly despite their loyalty and sacrifice to country. For those who have been, for all practicable purposes, pushed out of public service for reasons unrelated to performance, but instead seeded in politics, we should not turn our backs.
Central Intelligence Agency,
Washington, DC, February 10, 2006.
Mrs. VALERIE WILSON
DEAR MRS. WILSON, This letter is in response to your recent telephone conversation with regarding when you would be eligible to receive your deferred annuity. Per federal statute, employees participating under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) Special Category, who have acquired a minimum of 20 years of service, are eligible to receive their deferred annuity at their Minimum Retirement Age (MRA). Your MRA is age 56, at which time you'll be eligible to receive a deferred annuity.
Your deferred annuity will be based on the regular FERS computation rate, one percent for every year of service vice the FERS Special rate of 1.7% for every year of service. You will receive 1.7% for each year of overseas service, prorated on a monthly basis, after January 1, 1987 in the calculation of your annuity. Our records show that since January 1, 1987, you have acquired 6 years, 1 month and 29 days of overseas service.
Following is a list of your federal service:
Dates of Service: CIA, CIA (LWOP), CIA Ð(P/T 40), from 11/9/1985 to 1/9/2006--total 20 years, 7 days.
Based on the above service and your resignation on January 9, 2006, your estimated deferred annuity is $21,541.00 per year, or $1795 per month, beginning at age 56.
The above figures are estimates for your planning purposes. The Office of Personnel Management, as the final adjudicator of creditable service and annuity computations, determines final annuity amounts. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
------.
END
56
posted on
01/17/2007 2:43:28 PM PST
by
deport
To: Mo1
Was government money spent to send Joe to Niger? Can we get that back?
To: deport
deport! Take a bow!!!! Take two!
58
posted on
01/17/2007 2:44:15 PM PST
by
onyx
(DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
To: onyx
To: Howlin
Unbelievable.
Can you imagine the uproar if we'd tried a similar thing with Linda Tripp?
60
posted on
01/17/2007 2:45:07 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson