Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: NormsRevenge
If they think Conservatives are angry now they ain't seen nothing yet!
2 posted on
01/15/2007 5:34:23 PM PST by
proudofthesouth
(Mao said that power comes at the point of a rifle; I say FREEDOM does.)
To: NormsRevenge
Rush Limbaugh has been warning about this!
3 posted on
01/15/2007 5:35:19 PM PST by
TruthConquers
(Delenda est publius schola)
To: NormsRevenge
It would have to overcome a Republican filibuster and a Bush veto and then get 2/3rds of Congress to override.
It sounds scary, but it's not going to happen in the next two years for sure.
5 posted on
01/15/2007 5:38:54 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: NormsRevenge
They are afraid of war. If you want a war lefties, bring it on.
6 posted on
01/15/2007 5:38:59 PM PST by
alarm rider
(Fear of Hillary is the distinguishing feature of the average and even well educated conservative.)
To: NormsRevenge
Thanks for posting.
Excellent reporting. Too bad they had to use America's premier media whoring outfit, USNewswire.
7 posted on
01/15/2007 5:39:16 PM PST by
upchuck
(The American coup de grĂ¢ce is well under way. Thus far, the Donks haven't had to fire a shot.)
To: NormsRevenge
And, so far, what have we heard from our GOP Big Tent Warrior leadership in Washington?
Nothing.
8 posted on
01/15/2007 5:41:11 PM PST by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: NormsRevenge
You mean we won't be able to denounce liberals for the traitorous, cowardly, corrupt, ignorant, lazy, bureaucracy-loving, worthless b$stards that they are? Well, sh$t!
9 posted on
01/15/2007 5:41:52 PM PST by
NaughtiusMaximus
(Our troops are smart. It's our politicians who are stupid.)
To: NormsRevenge
Great idea to let the Democrats take the majority!! That'll teach us all a lesson. /sarc
To: Kaslin
13 posted on
01/15/2007 5:45:45 PM PST by
Tut
To: NormsRevenge
To: NormsRevenge
This is grandstanding. Conservative radio proponents would fight it on the grounds that the current arrangement is, in fact, fair; since libs control the major media. The last thing the left wants is a federal court case; or Congressional hearings, for that matter; that would focus on the transparent figleaf of MSM "objectivity."
27 posted on
01/15/2007 5:55:44 PM PST by
atomic conspiracy
(Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
To: NormsRevenge
29 posted on
01/15/2007 5:58:53 PM PST by
weps4ret
(Things the make you go; Hmmmmmmm?)
To: NormsRevenge
This is just so asinine, no one wants to hear their crap. When people actually hear their pitch they are turned off. The only way the "masses" follow them is by not knowing what they are up to. If they had anything of substance to say, "Air America" would not be bankrupt. If they want an "unfairness" doctrine, I say bring it on, they will only be educating people about how unAmerican they are.
33 posted on
01/15/2007 6:00:42 PM PST by
TheHound
(You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
To: NormsRevenge
Does the fairness doctrine mean that Rush Limbaugh can also demand a few minutes each night on Katie Couric's CBS Evening News to offer balance? < /sarcasm>
-PJ
To: NormsRevenge
CONSERVATIVES WHO SAT AT HOME: IF TRUE, THIS IS THE RESULT OF YOUR 'TEACHING THE REPUBLICANS A LESSON'!
41 posted on
01/15/2007 6:16:25 PM PST by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
To: NormsRevenge
I feel a chill wind blowing across America...
No, wait. They already said this about us. I'm confused. Just which way IS that wind a blowin'?
To: All
Congress to give
FCC bureaucrats the ability to grant liberal activists "equal access" to conservative programs?
I don't think so. I believe that the courts were about to end the old "Fairness Doctrine" arguing that modern media give all views a fair airing. Reagan ended the old "Fairness Doctrine" in 1987.
IMO what is a danger is the argument of a University of Chicago employee in his book, Republic.com.
The author argued that depending solely upon the narrow views of just one side of the argument (i.e., the conservative view, according to his interviews I heard) was a danger to our democracy. Government should force those people to read / hear / see other views. I believe he has backed off from literally forcing people.
The book was praised in the NY Times and was a best seller at some universities.
IOW, we can keep talk radio and the Internet as is but we may have to prove that we considered alternate views. Perhaps there will be daily quizzes?
I lived through the decades of the old "Fairness Doctrine."
We cannot permit curtailment of our free speech again! It's been defended with blood against enemies. We can do no less. Our free speech, their blood.
43 posted on
01/15/2007 6:20:27 PM PST by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
To: NormsRevenge
They're totalitarians. They won't be happy until everyone is compelled to agree with them.
To: NormsRevenge
This exactly the crap we will now be dealing with and it is very scary. It is more important than anything to battle this and this is the time to SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC WITH A FINICIAL DONATION NOW to keep this forum up and running...
48 posted on
01/15/2007 6:29:12 PM PST by
tubebender
( Everything east of the San Andreas fault will eventually plunge into the Atlantic Ocean...)
To: NormsRevenge; billhilly
We've read this, but ping again, we need to be aware. This is NOT good.
51 posted on
01/15/2007 6:38:16 PM PST by
girlangler
(Fish Fear Me)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson