Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nifong conduct rebuked early (DukeLax DA was warned)
Raleigh News & Observer ^ | Jan 15, 2007 | Joe Neff

Posted on 01/15/2007 4:04:02 AM PST by abb

Published: Jan 15, 2007 12:30 AM Modified: Jan 15, 2007 06:10 AM

Nifong conduct rebuked early State Bar has letter from lawyer warning prosecutor of ethical violations

Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong, on MSNBC, shows how he said a woman was choked while being raped at a Duke lacrosse party.

Joseph Neff, Staff Writer In the first weeks of the Duke lacrosse case, Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong continued to disparage lacrosse players in public after a defense attorney had put him on notice that he was violating ethical rules governing the conduct of lawyers. The N.C. State Bar has charged Nifong with making improper statements to the media. The Bar is likely to use the letter from defense attorney Joseph B. Cheshire V as evidence that Nifong had been warned he was crossing ethical boundaries early on.

"Your reported comments have greatly prejudiced any court proceedings that may arise," Cheshire wrote on March 30, three days after Nifong began making public statements about the case.

"I do not understand why you will reportedly speak to the media in such certain, condemning terms before all the evidence is in, but you will not have the courtesy to meet or even speak with a representative of someone you have publicly condemned, despite your knowledge of the presumption of innocence and your position as an officer of the court bound by the Rules of Professional Conduct related to pre-trial publicity."

The letter makes it more difficult for Nifong to argue that his remarks were off-the-cuff, said Thomas Metzloff, who teaches legal ethics at Duke Law School.

"That gets away from the spur of the moment defense, that 'I just went with it, I really didn't mean it, I was caught up in the emotion of the moment,' " Metzloff said.

The bar charged Nifong with violating a rule requiring prosecutors to "refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused." The bar also charged Nifong with engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

Nifong brought charges of rape, sexual assault and kidnapping against three former lacrosse players: David Evans, 23; Collin Finnerty, 20; and Reade Seligmann, 20, saying they sexually assaulted a dancer from an escort agency during a March 13 team party. They have proclaimed their innocence and called the accusations lies. Nifong dropped the rape charges in December. On Friday, he asked the Attorney General's Office to take over the case.

Nifong goes public

Nifong made his first public statements on March 27, two weeks after the lacrosse party. "The circumstances of the rape indicated a deep racial motivation for some of the things that were done," Nifong told The Associated Press. "It makes a crime that is by its nature one of the most offensive and invasive even more so."

The woman is black; the accused players are white.

"We're talking about a situation where had somebody spoken up and said, 'Wait a minute, we can't do this,' this incident might not have taken place," Nifong said to The News & Observer.

"The contempt that was shown for the victim, based on her race, was totally abhorrent," Nifong told ABC TV. "My guess is that some of this stonewall of silence that we had seen may tend to crumble once charges start to come out."

The case instantly became a national and international story, with dozens of television trucks flocking around Duke and the Durham courthouse. Nifong estimated he gave 50 to 70 interviews in that first week. He called the players hooligans and said that "Duke students' daddies could buy them expensive lawyers."

The barrage of publicity was too much for Cheshire, who represents Evans.

Cheshire wrote in his letter that on March 29, he had his paralegal, Moira Bitzenhofer, call Nifong's office to set up a meeting so the defense lawyer could talk to the prosecutor either in person or on the phone. Nifong, through his assistant, Sheila Eason, declined to talk with Cheshire.

Cheshire wrote a strongly worded response and faxed it to Nifong at 3:42 p.m. on March 30.

"You and I have known each other for a long time, and I do not mind telling you I was amazed at that response," Cheshire wrote. "In 33 years, I have never seen such a request denied by a prosecutor, nor in such a manner. Your responsive comments, reported to Ms. Bitzenhofer by Ms. Eason verbatim, seemed to suggest I should call the Durham Police Department and have my client charged with a crime before you would have a conversation with me on a topic you have demonstrated no reluctance to discuss with myriad local and national news reporters over the last several days."

Cheshire went on to list some of Nifong's comments, as reported by The New York Times, WRAL and The News & Observer.

Cheshire said he didn't understand how Nifong could refuse to meet with a lawyer for one of the men the prosecutor had condemned in public. Nifong had essentially announced to the world that dozens of people were guilty of committing or aiding a racially motivated gang-rape, Cheshire wrote. And he wrongly proclaimed that the players wouldn't cooperate with police, when the truth was that three captains had voluntarily given interviews and their DNA to police, without consulting a lawyer.

"In addition to being patently false, your comments about the failure of anyone under suspicion to speak to law enforcement represent the type of negative comments on the exercise of Fifth Amendment rights that you would never be able to get away with in a courtroom."

Cheshire concluded that Nifong had left him and other defense lawyers no choice but to defend their presumed innocent clients in the media: "Sadly and unfortunately, that has created an atmosphere of trying these matters in the media, rather than a court of law, and that could have -- and should have -- been avoided."

Primary campaign

The day after receiving Cheshire's letter, Nifong appeared on MSNBC and demonstrated how the accuser had struggled to breathe while she was being choked during the alleged rape. He told The N&O he was certain a sexual assault had occurred at the house. And he continued to discuss the case as he campaigned to win the Democratic primary in the district attorney's race.

"The reason that I took this case is because this case says something about Durham that I'm not going to let be said," Nifong said at an election forum on April 12. "I'm not going to allow Durham's view in the minds of the world to be a bunch of lacrosse players at Duke raping a black girl from Durham."

Nifong has made few public comments after winning the primary May 2.

Even though he has recused himself from the case, he may face more charges from the Bar.

The Grievance Committee of the State Bar is meeting later this week and may add more charges against Nifong, Metzloff said.

The most likely charges would concern Nifong's withholding of DNA evidence favorable to the defense, Metzloff said. The director of a private laboratory testified that he and Nifong agreed not to report that tests had found DNA from unidentified men in and on the accuser.

"It's likely, but not a sure thing," Metzloff said. "It's likely they might want the judge to start things off."

In North Carolina, trial judges can punish or sanction lawyers for legal misconduct in a case.

Superior Court Judge W. Osmond Smith III, the trial judge, can find Nifong in contempt of court, but he can't disbar him.

"In some ways, the judge is better able to assess Nifong's alleged misstatements and the withheld evidence," Metzloff said.

Staff writer Joseph Neff can be reached at 829-4516 or jneff@newsobserver.com.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dukelax; durham; durhamdirtbag; lacrosse; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last
To: abb

Of course this doesn't say much for his voting constituency, but as it appears that topic is not Poltically Correct and will be walled off like the crazy aunt who is locked in the basement.


41 posted on 01/15/2007 5:57:23 AM PST by junta (It's Jihad stupid! It's the borders stupid! It's Political Correctness stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

The bar has the bastard dead to rights. He is finished.


42 posted on 01/15/2007 5:58:44 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb; maggief; xoxoxox

That gets away from the spur of the moment defense, that 'I just went with it, I really didn't mean it, I was caught up in the emotion of the moment,' " Metzloff said.




Metzloff might want to amend this. He was caught up in the emotions of the moment:

Rensentment
Anger
Rage
Contempt

This is a insigfnificant little man who quit the Amimal Control Board because all were not with him. An instanceof: "If you are not with me, you are against me"

This is a insigfnificant little man rumored to monitor the blogs and supposedly stated he will extract his pound of flesh.

This is a insigfnificant little man finally out of traffic court and sitting in the big boy's chair.

This is a insigfnificant little man who first took Freda Black's parking space and then fired her.

Mikey is ruled by his emotions. He knew that if Freda won the election he had no job. What he could have done from there did not matter. He knew his job was at stake.

I'd be willing to bet if Freda won the DA race, there would be a dramtic shift in courthouse dynamics. I think many in Durham were afraid the status quo would be upset if Freda won the election.


43 posted on 01/15/2007 6:03:28 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

Let's hope and pray the only thing Nifong gets to say for a while is "Do you want fries with that?"


44 posted on 01/15/2007 6:04:49 AM PST by Clifford The Big Red Dog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Clifford The Big Red Dog

I would have said, "Mr Nifong, you picked the wrong family to jerk around. If I could rip your balls off and pull your heart out through your throat, I would"

In that context, she was very restrained. :-)


45 posted on 01/15/2007 6:07:56 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

60 Minutes video up
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/11/...in2352512.shtml


46 posted on 01/15/2007 6:17:02 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Clifford The Big Red Dog
While we're at it, each and every one of those imbecile brainless liberal "professors", (remember, those who can do-those who CAN'T teach.) who signed that statement in the papers should be individually sued for libel. Destroy them all....here's a great chance to teach academia to keep their mouths shut.

What about a class action lawsuit against the Gang of 88? Could you do that under RICO -- a conspiracy to deny the civil rights of the Duke Lacrosse players?

47 posted on 01/15/2007 6:18:54 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: abb


Remember how Nifong suddenly clammed up after giving umteen dozen interviews? That was about the time the bar opened this case.


48 posted on 01/15/2007 6:20:28 AM PST by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
Oh, and the accuser's newborn baby who, it's safe to say, will never play Duke lacrosse.

Well, it's not like Roofie has never been wrong before ....

49 posted on 01/15/2007 6:21:50 AM PST by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb
Gerard A. Morrison of Raleigh, who works in job development,

Have you ever noticed that lefties seem to have very nebulous job descriptions?

50 posted on 01/15/2007 6:25:49 AM PST by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
"The bar has the bastard dead to rights. He is finished."

There's always the inevitable book deal. Of course, any substantial advance would increase the likelihood of Nifong himself being sued by the accused.
51 posted on 01/15/2007 6:26:54 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: abb

Nifong is toast.


52 posted on 01/15/2007 6:28:33 AM PST by devane617 (It's McCain and a Rat -- Now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
I worked for an attorney in Washington state once that had been censured by the state bar association for things he said, while a county prosecutor, about the accused, during the trial!!! That just shows you they have limits and this a-hole crossed the line.
53 posted on 01/15/2007 6:29:04 AM PST by RetiredArmy (Dimocrats stand for everything I hate, despise and wish to see destroyed, including dimocrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Nifong: from the Greek meaning TOAST.


54 posted on 01/15/2007 6:32:31 AM PST by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody want a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

You could, but its better to pluck them totally one-by-one instead of allowing them to pool their resources....both in defending AND in the financial penalties.

Unless in NC they allow all defendants to be "jointly and severally" liable like they do here in PA.

Then go for it. RICO cases are always fun, and if you ask me, academia are every bit the racketeers the goodfellas in Cosa Nostra are.


55 posted on 01/15/2007 6:32:59 AM PST by Clifford The Big Red Dog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Had Freda won the primary, this case would be a distant memory. And so would Nifong.


56 posted on 01/15/2007 6:36:39 AM PST by Sue Perkick (Just a water spider on the pond of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

Nifong is a loser, no question. I am becoming more and more disgusted with the media attempting to rehabilitate the accuser. I have heard it said she is a victim of Nifong. Truth be told, we all know what she is and she is no victim and deserves to be punished.


57 posted on 01/15/2007 6:44:48 AM PST by AZFolks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: abb

The bar case aside, I think his biggest problem may be with the feds. Nifong has violated the rights of the LAX accused and could be slapped down by the feds. His actions appear to be intentional and involve a possible conspiracy (withheld lab results)


58 posted on 01/15/2007 6:46:42 AM PST by BOBWADE ("Nothing in life can be achieved without a little sweat and hard work")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I agree with your post 100%. His only motivation in all of this was to keep his job for another 3-1/2 years. That is the ONLY problem solution he was after.


59 posted on 01/15/2007 6:47:37 AM PST by Dukie07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
I'd be willing to bet if Freda won the DA race, there would be a dramtic shift in courthouse dynamics. I think many in Durham were afraid the status quo would be upset if Freda won the election.

Nifong was protecting his pension but the courthouse crowd was against Freda for some reason, IMO. There is more there ...
60 posted on 01/15/2007 7:02:30 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson