One word -- Constitution! Guess the LA Times has no clue!
The Times recommends, for a change, amending the Constitution instead of having it "interpreted" by friendly judges.
Such uncharacteristic behavior should be encouraged.
The procedural hurdles put in place for an amendment are such that one can only pass if an overwhelming majority support it. I'm not worried.
For that matter, I see no real reason why immigrants of perhaps 20 years citizenship should not be eligible to be President. Not a real important issue for me, but not a problem either.
Guess you didn't read the article.
It is about a Constitutional Amendment, and there are quite a few CongressCritters, from both sides of the aisle, totally in favor of it.