To: MizSterious; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...
2 posted on
01/06/2007 9:10:46 AM PST by
knighthawk
(We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
To: knighthawk
Should have named it the Slick-10 fighter jet.
Thanks again Bill Clinton.
3 posted on
01/06/2007 9:11:06 AM PST by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
To: knighthawk
China "has become the world's fourth country that is capable of developing on its own advanced fighter planes, engines and missiles," Fourth? Sweden, the UK, Italy, France, Russia, the US, Japan...
5 posted on
01/06/2007 9:16:00 AM PST by
rogue yam
To: knighthawk
Does it have an anti-collision system?
To: knighthawk
7 posted on
01/06/2007 9:17:16 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: knighthawk
Really!!!!! "China has also traditionally had little success with engine development"
Are you saying that Clinton and Gore forgot to give them that type of information? Amazing.....they gave them everything else.
11 posted on
01/06/2007 9:26:32 AM PST by
Ron2
To: knighthawk
You have to admit it is damned funny that all of the pretenders, those who have to beg, borrow, buy, or steal their tech, always make this claim. The NorKies, EyeRanians, et al. It's that dog that barks a little too shrilly and pees on your shoe.
13 posted on
01/06/2007 9:33:47 AM PST by
chartnah
To: knighthawk
The J-10 is designed similar to the Israeli Lavi which was a concept design similar to that of the F-16. This makes the J-10 at best a 4th generation fighter even if massively upgraded and improved. As such it doesn't stand a chance against 5th generation fighters like the F-22 or the EuroFighter and is even inferior to fighters such as the MiG-35 and the Su-35.
16 posted on
01/06/2007 10:18:32 AM PST by
kress
To: knighthawk
Maybe we can have an overflight during Hillary's inaugural.
17 posted on
01/06/2007 10:45:56 AM PST by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: knighthawk
". . . developed with Israeli help using the U.S. F-16 fighter as a template."
Thanks Israel!
To: knighthawk
So, does it use American technology?
24 posted on
01/06/2007 11:47:58 AM PST by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( WND, NewsMax, Townhall.com, and Drudge Report are not valid news sources.)
To: knighthawk
Built with 100% STOLEN technology.
29 posted on
01/06/2007 12:23:29 PM PST by
dljordan
To: knighthawk; MizSterious; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri
Hey all, check out my hate mail from Moker!!! Thanks Moker your dillusion is noted. Go Yankees!!!
"Listen up dude,
the chinese never steal anything from anyone. history proves this, thier culture was the most advanced in the pass 3000 years compared with america's 100 years. america's army/airforce/navy are only good at relying on superior technology, but when it comes to a real war with a big country, it loses every time. why is it that the US always pick on countries that are smaller at itself, and why does the US get ask for assitance from smaller countries like UK, germany and france? I mean surely a big powerful country like america can cope with the likes of iraq. It can't even beat iraq, what good is all this technology. I tell you one thing, you should get your facts straight before you start boosting about your yankee superiority.
"
33 posted on
01/28/2007 8:03:43 AM PST by
Porterville
(Through experience I have discovered that Yoda is a dumbass and Karma is a lie.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson