He describes himself above as: "I am an economic, a fiscal, a social and a compassionate conservative," Brownback said last month.
I am one of his constituents, have met him and have discussed issues with him.
He's not Presidential Timber, more like a Thistle - that's a noxious weed out here in Kansas
He's doing an excellent job where he is, in the Senate.
What are his views regarding immigration? Also what as he done to counter govt spending? Its all well and good to claim one is this or that but the bottom line remains - has he taken an active part in reducing the size of the Fed Gov or is he a "compassionate conservative" i.e. spend money like a liberal but you're forgiven if you mention Jesus and God as the reason for the taxpayer theft.
too liberal on immigration, he's running for VP.
Thus far he gets my support. I wish he would ditch the compassionate part.
PING
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NEWS RELEASE
January 4, 2007
Contact: Rob Wasinger
Brownback Enlists Key Iowa Conservative Leader
Noted pro-life activist offers support
DES MOINES, Ia. - U.S. Senator Sam Brownback today announced that he has enlisted the support of Kim Lehman, President and Executive Director of Iowa Right to Life, for his upcoming Iowans for Brownback Leadership Committee.
"For those who care about protecting the unborn and supporting the right to life, Senator Brownback is the clear choice," said Lehman. "While other candidates are in the process of defining and refining their position at the
start of this campaign, Senator Brownback has been principled, consistent, and unwavering in his support for the right to life."
Senator Brownback expressed his appreciation for the early support, saying, "I am gratified to have the support of Kim Lehman, as her support in Iowa will be essential for success in 2008. I am proudly and unequivocally pro-life, and I look forward to optimistically and compassionately articulating the pro-life position in this upcoming campaign."
Since 2000, Lehman has been Iowa Right to Life's Executive Director and chief lobbyist. She was the State Director for Concerned Women for America before her taking her current position at Iowa Right to Life.
Lehman continued, "Senator Brownback has also been a tremendous advocate for a judiciary that respects the law and does not legislate from the bench. Further, he has plainly stated his opposition to the tragic Roe v. Wade
decision, which legalized abortion for all nine months of pregnancy. I look forward to working with Iowans from all 99 counties to enlist support for Senator Brownback and his quest for the Republican nomination."
Support from the pro-life community in Iowa will be critical in the 2008 Republican caucus. An August 2006 poll reported by the Des Moines Register of likely GOP caucus-goers found that while a large majority are pro-life (70 percent), nearly half (46 percent) said the issue of abortion will be a key determining factor in whom they decide to support.
Apart from that concern I would be open to looking more closely at Sen. Brownback.
YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! PRAISE THE LORD!!!!! Onyx, thanks for the ping!! Here me screaming from SD to the shores of the US!!!
Nominating a Kansan is a sure prescription for defeat (to wit, Bob Dole and Alf Landon). We're going to win Kansas' whopping 6 electoral votes unless the Democrats carry 45+ states. Why not nominate someone who can add blue sstates, rather than subtract red ones?
Having read that you said that the American Conservative Union (ACU) recorded a perfect voting score of 100% for Senator Sam Brownback, I went to the ACU website to check this information, and it is true that for the year 2005, Sam Brownback is among the 10 Best and Brightest Standout Senators, according to the ACU (see http://www.conservative.org/archive2/senate.asp). This should make clear that Sam Brownback is from the Conservative Persuasion.
However, because of Sam Brownbacks position about immigration, I am not sure that Sam Brownbacks score in 2006 got a 100% favorable rate by the ACU, because, on March 28, the ACU said: The immigration bill produced yesterday by the Senate Judiciary Committee can in no way be viewed as positive reform. On the contrary, the bill essentially provides for a sweeping amnesty program for the 11 million-plus illegal aliens already in the United States. [
] The ACU applauded Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Charles Grassley (R-IA), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Jeff Sessions (R-AL) John Cornyn (R-TX) and Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma), all of whom refused to allow misplaced compassion to excuse criminality. (see: http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/2006/060328pr.asp). Please note carefully that the ACU did not say that these senators have no compassion at all, but that they do not have misplaced compassion.
Because Senator Sam Brownback is a Compassionate Conservative, a number of people may believe that Sam Brownback seems to have this type of misplaced compassion towards immigrants. However, one may wonder whether this is a true perception of Sam Brownbacks position or rather a misperception of his real position. It seems to me that if Sam Brownback wants to get the vote of the Conservatives, he needs to make an effort to make more clearly known that he is in favor of strengthening the borders (construction of a good fence in the Southwest, enforcement of the immigration laws, etc.). And he should supply a satisfactory explanation about his position concerning the millions of illegal aliens who are presently in the United States. Sam Brownback did vote for the fence, but many people may not be very sure how strong he is on this point. On the other hand, his compassionate side and his desire to work with other senators to find a comprehensive solution about the millions of immigrants, have led many to believe that Sam Brownback is definitely in favor of an open borders / amnesty policy. As long as this is what many people understand about his position, Sam Brownback will have great difficulties to win the presidential primaries and the general elections. The Democrats are usually more consistent with their liberal agenda than Sam Brownback may appear to be concerning immigration. Sam Brownback needs not only to show that he wants to treat with dignity everyone (including immigrants legal or illegal), and to find a constructive solution concerning the millions of illegal immigrants, but also he needs to dispel the impression that his compassionate attitude may lead him to reward the criminal behavior of illegal immigrants by granting them a free-pass (i.e. an easy participation in a Guest-Worker Program that will help them to become American Citizens).
There is no doubt that it is not easy to find a good balanced view on such a subject: too much compassion and Sam Brownback may look a softy or a compromiser on immigration. Too much justice (strongly enforcing the laws against illegal immigration), and Sam Brownback may look a heartless/narrow-minded far-right conservative, desiring to promote the sending of Gestapo forces to crack down on illegal immigration. Compassion and Justice together must balance the equation. Addressing adequately this situation is easy neither for Sam Brownback nor for anybody else, if a good and fair solution is to be found. We must also realize that Sam Brownback cannot please everybody (whatever he may say or do about this matter). When we consider the other choices that we may have for the presidential elections of 2008, I believe that Sam Brownback remains an option worthy of consideration for Conservatives.