I think it was one of President Bush's better speeches. I am not sure the plan will work. Most of what I have read on the subject would indicate that more troops are needed for the desired short term affect. The short term is obviously important for the long term... I do hope there is a noticeable difference. I think it's good that the administration has tried to explain the region a little more and exactly what is at stake. It's surprising to talk to people who still don't seem to get what failure in Iraq means.
We have an event analyzing the speech tomorrow morning at work. I will try to remember to post excerpts if I have a minute. I am also going to be in on a state dept conference call about Foreign Policy in Iraq Friday, will post notes from that if allowed.
Thanks NW, will look forward to your posts.
"The short term is obviously important for the long term..."
I agree.
"I am also going to be in on a state dept conference call about Foreign Policy in Iraq Friday, will post notes from that if allowed."
That would be neato.
The plan will work IF the take the gloves off the current rules of engagement and allow the soldiers to do what they are trained for - killing the bad guy, and not being a pop-up target for the bad guys.
All the other components for success - diplomatic efforts, economic incentives, etc. - are there and ready to go.