Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Please remember these 17-yo Americans who died Nov, Dec 1950, under Truman, to free S. Korea.

Posted on 01/02/2007 9:05:40 AM PST by syriacus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
I did a search on those born in 1933. There may have been more who were 17, if they died before their 18th birthday in 1950. (e.g., someone born December 20, 1932, might have died at age 17 in November 1950).

Also, it's possible that some 16 year-olds are among those who died in 1950.

1 posted on 01/02/2007 9:05:43 AM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: syriacus

I believe we still have 800 or so buried up in North Korea, killed when the Chinese unilaterally, illegally, pre-emptively, immorally, and unjustly entered the war.


2 posted on 01/02/2007 9:18:05 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

I doubt that any "surge" into Iraq would include many 17 year olds.


3 posted on 01/02/2007 9:26:12 AM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Democrat Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Did anyone object to Truman's 1950 "police action" against "bandits" on the grounds that 0 Koreans flew planes into prominent US buildings?
4 posted on 01/02/2007 9:31:41 AM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Democrat Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Truman was a Democrat, therefore the Korean War was a "good" war.
5 posted on 01/02/2007 9:32:33 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Baker's Iraq Surrender Group - warming up the last helicopter out of Baghdad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

May they rest in peace.


6 posted on 01/02/2007 9:44:37 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Anyone who has an honest or moderately intelligent bone in his/her body knows that saddum had WMD's.

That "we" somehow allow this spin to continue is nuts. At each mention of this stupid spin, honest people need to stop the conversation and ask the person of he/she REEEEALLY believes that there were no WMD's. Press them. Interrupt the flow of the spin.

So much of the arguments against Bush and the war are BASED on this stupid fallacy that, without it, the arguments would be obvious jokes..
7 posted on 01/02/2007 9:50:09 AM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
May they rest in peace.

Yes. And may we all remember to be grateful to these young men, who (most likely) have no descendants.

If they were still alive, they could be 73 year-old grandparents or great-grandparents.

8 posted on 01/02/2007 9:50:32 AM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Democrat Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bannie
Anyone who has an honest or moderately intelligent bone in his/her body knows that saddum had WMD's.

Dictators have a powerful craving for powerful weaponry.

If someone would have hanged Kim il-sung soon after he invaded South Korea in 1950, his son would most likely not be threatening to develop nuclear weapons in the 21st Century.

9 posted on 01/02/2007 9:56:46 AM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Democrat Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Truman was a Democrat, therefore the Korean War was a "good" war.

And I might add that the Korean War was "UN-approved"

10 posted on 01/02/2007 9:57:58 AM PST by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bannie

Isn't it funny.....

* Kennedy didn't need to find WMDs to justify going into Vietnam
* Clinton didn't need to find WMDs in the former Yugoslavia and
* Truman didn't need to find WMDs in Korea.


11 posted on 01/02/2007 10:00:03 AM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Democrat Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas
That was only because the "wrong" China was recognized by the UN so the Soviet Union was having a hissy fit and boycotted to vote. If it had been business as usual, the USSR would have vetoed UN action so the US, South Korea and a few allies would have had to fight without the UN's blessing.
12 posted on 01/02/2007 10:01:22 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Baker's Iraq Surrender Group - warming up the last helicopter out of Baghdad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Truman was a Democrat, therefore the Korean War was a "good" war.

Exactly.
Since Truman was a Democrat, it's okay that almost 34000 Americans died for Korean freedom.
Since Bush is a Republican, it's not okay for 3,000 Americans to die for Iraqi freedom.

More Americans died in Korea in one month* than have died in all the years we have been in Iraq.

*3475 Americans died fighting for Korean freedom in November, 1950
3345 Americans died fighting for Korean freedom in September, 1950

13 posted on 01/02/2007 10:04:52 AM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Democrat Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

lets remember all that died in all wars to continue providing us our freedom. i lost an 18 year old uncle who fought the inchon invasion as well as the chosin and survived only to die shortly after in korea from spinal meningitis.


14 posted on 01/02/2007 10:11:47 AM PST by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

It's also no coincidence that the U.S. either lost those wars, or has committed itself to a perpetual military presence in those places.


15 posted on 01/02/2007 10:17:29 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

16 posted on 01/02/2007 10:33:14 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas
And I might add that the Korean War was "UN-approved"

Truman was lucky. Russia was boycotting the security council.

here's a chrononology

June 24, 1950 - (U.S. time = Saturday, June 24) (Korea time= Sunday, June 25) at 4 am NK invaded SK with 90,000 troops equipped with Soviet weapons and Soviet T-34 tanks, quickly overran SK defenses, captured Uijongbu highway center 20 mi. north of Seoul in 2 days, captured Seoul by June 28 as ROK fled south blowing up Han River bridges, killing refugees, trapping 44,000 own men north of river

June 25, 1950 - Sunday, Truman returned to Blair House from Independence, MO, and met with NSC - ordered U.S. Navy and AF into SK to stop invasion (but not Army ground troops)

June 26, 1950 - Monday, Truman asked and received support from UN - Russia was absent because boycotting Security Council until seat given to Communist China

June 27, 1950 - Tuesday, 2nd UN meeting approved use of ground troops; Truman ordered the 7th Fleet to the Taiwan Strait to protect Formosa. -

Ironically, within 6 months, the Europeans were complaining that Truman was paying too much attention to Asia. They wanted the US to be available for their defense. MacArthur later pointed out that the US needed to fight the communists in Korea or the fight against Communism would take place in the streets of Europe.
17 posted on 01/02/2007 10:36:07 AM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Democrat Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

In the interest of balance, you did pick two of the worst months in the Korean War (I believe your choices covered the Inchon landings/first re-capture of Seoul and the Chinese offensive)


18 posted on 01/02/2007 10:36:55 AM PST by Panzerfaust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

I love it!!

19 posted on 01/02/2007 10:37:22 AM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Democrat Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Panzerfaust
n the interest of balance, you did pick two of the worst months in the Korean War (I believe your choices covered the Inchon landings/first re-capture of Seoul and the Chinese offensive)

I'm not sure what your point is.

20 posted on 01/02/2007 10:38:06 AM PST by syriacus (30,000 US deaths in Korea in 2 1/2 years under Democrat Truman (Jul, 1950 - Dec, 1952))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson