Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mc6809e
I agree with that simple law of physics. It is also possible for an Ion Drive to accelerate a space ship to speeds of over 100,000 miles per hour. But not at a practical rate of acceleration.

The problem I think many engineers are faced with today is the fact that they are trying to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy then turning it back into mechanical energy. The loss of efficiency is predictable and difficult to overcome.
155 posted on 01/01/2007 2:39:12 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Maynerd Blazejewsi for President '08! (The third party choice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: PSYCHO-FREEP
The problem I think many engineers are faced with today is the fact that they are trying to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy then turning it back into mechanical energy. The loss of efficiency is predictable and difficult to overcome.

But the method by which chemical energy becomes mechanical energy is very important.

Gasoline powered IC engines have poor efficiencies of around 25%, even though they convert chemical energy directly to mechanical energy.

But a coal burning plant might have an efficiency of between 36% and 48%. Even assuming 10% line loss means you get 33% to 43% efficiency at the electrical socket. Another 10% loss in the car's electric motors and you still are ahead on efficiency. And all the while burning a cheaper fuel.

And some power plants with gas fired turbines reach up to 60% efficiency!

181 posted on 01/01/2007 3:29:47 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson