Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gentlemen, Start Your Plug-Ins: How does 500 miles a gallon sound to you?
WSJ ^ | 1/1/2007 | R. JAMES WOOLSEY

Posted on 01/01/2007 10:44:24 AM PST by Uncledave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-312 last
To: dcwusmc
Of course, there will be the backlash against these vehicles the minute we have the first accident when battery acid is released into the street, eating away at an otherwise lightly-injured victim, killing her (IF she's lucky) and horribly disfiguring her corpse at the same time.

Only if she's a blond, white girl... (/Greta's Law...)

301 posted on 01/02/2007 1:09:57 PM PST by gogeo (Irony is not one of Islam's core competencies (thx Pharmboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
I think I agree with everything you said there. If a person born 100 years ago saw our technology, it would seem like voodoo. I don't believe in magic, but I also have a healthy respect for technology and greed...and what they can accomplish when combined.

Toyota is on their second generation hybrid Prius. It's greatly improved over the first generation. GM is coming out with their own hybrid technology, which I believe will include plug in technology.

So...some say that they can't pull their horse trailer uphill with the A/C on at 90 degrees. They shouldn't try. The IC engine will be the primary transportation motivation for the foreseeable future.

This will be good technology for some, not useful for others. I don't think anyone is suggesting that people with horse trailers be forced to buy a hybrid; in following the posts, one would think they had.

I suspect that plug-in electric cars will occupy a niche for awhile, like in neighborhoods where it's legal to drive your golf cart on the street.

Plug in hybrids will have a somewhat larger niche (IMO) but still a niche. Non-plug hybrids will have a still larger one.

If one is interested in saving money or cutting petroleum usage, a small car or a motorcycle probably makes more sense now. You wouldn't want to drive your small car on a highway that has heavy truck traffic, and you wouldn't want to ride your MC in the rain; however, they use fuel that's readily available, and they're proven systems.

The market will sort out what makes sense, and what doesn't...the only thing for sure is that the Feds will pi$$ away $billions, as they always do, on "alternatives."

302 posted on 01/02/2007 1:36:22 PM PST by gogeo (Irony is not one of Islam's core competencies (thx Pharmboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
Suzi, you're wasting your time, you know...

Not me. I'm not working on it, nor waiting on it, but will welcome if it happens. Can't help it if other folks wanna be negative about it.

303 posted on 01/02/2007 1:45:13 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
My F150 4x4 solves the problem of traveling in heavy snow in the winter and carting my garden tools to my rental house 2 1/2 miles away each weekend from May to October. I have no commute as my home is also my office. The truck gets a full tank of gas every 3 months. Shopping and restaurants are so close that I could ride a bicycle or walk. Living in a small town has some advantages.
304 posted on 01/02/2007 2:18:48 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
You still missed your mistake...

$800 is for a month of electric (PG&E) or $9600 per year, plus the $900 for the batteries per year.

That means about $10,500 a year, which is equal to about 210 fill ups of a 20 gallon tank at $2.50 a gallon. That doesn't sound so reasonable.

Of course these numbers are all based on someone's guesstimate of a $800 per month electric bill. I have no idea whether that number is reasonable or not.

And who is Viola??? (kidding)

305 posted on 01/02/2007 3:14:24 PM PST by HundredDollars (Your mileage may vary. Not valid in NY or CA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: HundredDollars

--$800 is for a month of electric (PG&E) --

If you drive 24,000 miles per month ...


306 posted on 01/02/2007 3:26:32 PM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Hmmm. In an electrically driven car, one gains energy through regenerative braking while slowing down to a rest.
...
That would require a very large fly-wheel. Where does the energy come from to spin it? Going down hill?

Do these cars have one?

Sorry for what might be a dumb question but I am no more versed on this technology than I am on voodoo.

The electronic braking does not require a flywheel. Just as a engine must supply torque to turn a generator, torque slows down the car while recovering energy normally given up as heat in traditional brakes.

Regenerative Braking Charges Ahead, Motor Age Online

Similar technology is used in some industrial motor starters to provide stopping power of large motor driven applications. Rarely however are these motors stopped often enough to justify capturing the energy generated. Usually the current is routed through resistors and waste heat is generated. Typically applications would be a large fan that would be slow to stop without brakes.

307 posted on 01/02/2007 3:55:25 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: HundredDollars

No, I didn't miss anything. The poster said that gasoline was $800 a YEAR, that, combined with the amortized $7000 of the battery over it's 8 year life is a total of $1700 a year.


308 posted on 01/02/2007 6:07:45 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

The article is discussing plug in hybrids, and yes, there are vehicles coming onto the market in the next few years that will do all of the above.

I wonder if the hydrolic hybrid pickups are still coming out. The give you all of the benefits of regenerative breaking and standard ICE without the cost of batteries. That system is supposed to have a 2-3 year payback.


309 posted on 01/03/2007 6:43:20 AM PST by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

--That would require a very large fly-wheel. Where does the energy come from to spin it? Going down hill?--

If one were to employ a flywheel, the energy to spin it would come from the regenerative braking.


310 posted on 01/03/2007 8:46:05 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

--That would require a very large fly-wheel. Where does the energy come from to spin it? Going down hill?--


http://www.greencarcongress.com/2005/02/ldquoextremerdq.html


311 posted on 01/03/2007 8:48:03 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

>.rapidly developing oil-replacing technologies<<

Does oil shale count?


312 posted on 01/03/2007 8:48:05 AM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-312 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson