Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Middle School Girls Gone Wild
New York Times ^ | 29 December 2006 | LAWRENCE DOWNES

Posted on 12/30/2006 7:27:56 PM PST by shrinkermd

It’s hard to write this without sounding like a prig. But it’s just as hard to erase the images that planted the idea for this essay, so here goes. The scene is a middle school auditorium, where girls in teams of three or four are bopping to pop songs at a student talent show. Not bopping, actually, but doing elaborately choreographed re-creations of music videos, in tiny skirts or tight shorts, with bare bellies, rouged cheeks and glittery eyes.

They writhe and strut, shake their bottoms, splay their legs, thrust their chests out and in and out again. Some straddle empty chairs, like lap dancers without laps. They don’t smile much. Their faces are locked from grim exertion, from all that leaping up and lying down without poles to hold onto. “Don’t stop don’t stop,” sings Janet Jackson, all whispery. “Jerk it like you’re making it choke. ...Ohh. I’m so stimulated. Feel so X-rated.” The girls spend a lot of time lying on the floor. They are in the sixth, seventh and eighth grades.

As each routine ends, parents and siblings cheer, whistle and applaud. I just sit there, not fully comprehending. It’s my first suburban Long Island middle school talent show. I’m with my daughter, who is 10 and hadn’t warned me. I’m not sure what I had expected, but it wasn’t this. It was something different. Something younger. Something that didn’t make the girls look so ... one-dimensional.

It would be easy to chalk it up to adolescent rebellion, an ancient and necessary phenomenon, except these girls were barely adolescents and they had nothing to rebel against. This was an official function at a public school, a milieu that in another time or universe might have seen children singing folk ballads, say, or reciting the Gettysburg Address.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: culturewar; dancing; education; girls; indoctrination; middleschool; moralabsolutes; publikskoolz; schools; sex; sexualizingchildren; teensex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last
To: shrinkermd

Of course, they STILL want to act like rape is against the law!

These girls can parade around dressed like prostitutes and then they blame the BOYS for getting aroused!

I couldn't be happier I never had a girl in this day and age!


21 posted on 12/30/2006 7:55:06 PM PST by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Is wickedness becoming biblical in its proportions?


22 posted on 12/30/2006 7:55:12 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
I have an 18 year old daughter who danced for ~14 years. I've sat through more recitals and competitions than I could possibly remember. However, there are a couple that do stand out. There was one competition in particular that included several other dance studios from the Denver-metro area. Ballet, tap, jazz, funk, stuff I don't know about and then what can only be described as the erotic-dancers-in-training division.

I'm certainly no pearly-white innocent, but good grief these girls were WAAAY too young to be wearing stuff like that and/or moving like that to nasty music. My x-wife had warned me that one studio was especially excessive with this stuff and she was right. When the teacher-division was going on, one of the "teachers" from that studio did a little number. I've seen erotic dancers do less. Lets just say the applause afterwords had a distinctively male tone to it. Had she been a little closer I would have slipped a dollar bill in her outfit just to make the point. She had the body, the look and the hair that could make her rich in a high end strip club.

This is just my opinion, worth less then you'll pay for it, but I believe that most women have ZERO understanding of how men are effected by that sort of visual show.

After that competition I had a conversation with the gal who runs the studio my daughter attended. I told her that I was pleased that none of the dances performed by her studio and none of the costumes worn by her dancers grossly exceeded basic decency. Granted, some were a little edgy for me, but nothing, and I mean NOTHING, in comparison.
23 posted on 12/30/2006 7:55:41 PM PST by mad puppy ( For me, 2007 will be the best year I've had in a long time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I can't believe the decline in standards

Thank the pot smoking, liberal parents of these kids today!!!

24 posted on 12/30/2006 7:56:04 PM PST by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

"Just you be sure that Beaver is clean."


25 posted on 12/30/2006 7:57:02 PM PST by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nctexan; shrinkermd

I'm more of a prude when it comes to this topic. I work at a middle school, and I do not like seeing little girls becoming overly sexualized by this society. I hate even more seeing the children at the elementary schools I also work at wearing clothing that have been shown at fashion shows and designed for adult women (even then, I don't like seeing those fashions on adult women). While I want the enemies we are presently fighting defeated, I can certainly see why they don't want us involved in their world.


26 posted on 12/30/2006 7:57:16 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

Both of my daughters attended public high school,(my younger is a junior) but they never went to the dances. Not their scene. I was glad and never pushed them to go to the prom. Now the after prom party was another story. That was put on my parents and apparantly was a great deal of clean fun which they enjoyed.


27 posted on 12/30/2006 7:59:04 PM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Our girls are bratz, not slutz, they would argue, comfortable in the existence of a distinction.

I never noticed much of a distinction myself. There is definately a slutty aspect to the Bratz toys.

28 posted on 12/30/2006 8:00:07 PM PST by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04
But don't think for a minute it doesn't go on in private high schools. It's just as bad, if not worse. The prom stories I've heard are jaw-dropping in their debauchery
29 posted on 12/30/2006 8:00:46 PM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I'm from your generation, and H.S. dances where I went to school had teachers and parents who were constantly going around the dance floor and putting a stop to any activity deemed inappropriate. Sometimes they were busy, but the behavior was stopped or those students left the dance. I can't see any reason why this approach should not be in use today.


30 posted on 12/30/2006 8:04:29 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Of course, since O'Reilly reads the NY Times, he'll be all over this. He loves the subject of school students gone wild for some reason or other. Should do him with a eeek of shows I won't watch.


31 posted on 12/30/2006 8:04:36 PM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
"Wally, we absolutely forbid you to date Mary Ellen Rogers again. You and Beaver go take a bath."

LOL!!

32 posted on 12/30/2006 8:06:25 PM PST by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Very good article. I have read of schools banning dances because of the simulated sex acts that are called dancing these days. Yep some parents did complain. But too bad for them.

How any parent can watch their daughter strutting like Sluts R Us is beyond me. Yanking my daughter off stage if she had ever done such a thing would only be the first part of a very long grounding.

Parents need to be aware of the toxic music, dance, movies and tv that our children are exposed to every day.
We can do our part by keeping these deadly toxins out of our home. We can provide a haven. We can give them the love and discipline to help them grow into self assured persons. Persons who do not need to define themselves by sexualizing their gifts. We can teach them that all they do should be for the glory of God.


33 posted on 12/30/2006 8:06:25 PM PST by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I graduate in 1957 and believe me nothing like this would have been tolerated by the parents or the school administration. We were lucky if they let us square dance with the females in our class. As I remember, only once did that happen and the principal's wife was in charge. She was also a teacher and one false move she would have pulled us off the gym floor by the ears.


34 posted on 12/30/2006 8:07:25 PM PST by jerry639
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: Mobile Vulgus
Of course, they STILL want to act like rape is against the law! These girls can parade around dressed like prostitutes and then they blame the BOYS for getting aroused!

Perhaps I'm misreading this. It looks like you're saying that being aroused is an excuse for rape. Most people have roundly rejected the They-Were-Asking-For-It Defense, whether it applies to rape or any other violent crime. Besides, teenaged boys are aroused all the time.

36 posted on 12/30/2006 8:09:08 PM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

The ACLU has fought against standards and dress codes at schools.

Anything goes.


37 posted on 12/30/2006 8:09:42 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: Caesar Soze

It's not just adolescents. Could you imagine being Britney Spear's parents. I'd be so ashamed, I'd disown her.


39 posted on 12/30/2006 8:10:54 PM PST by umgud (The profound is only so to those that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I graduated HS in 1976 and there was absolutely nothing like the open eroticism seen today. To be honest, there have always been teenagers in the back of cars, but at least it was private and discreet.

Now in the 'zero tolerance' generation, the solutions are reduced to either banning social functions altogether or permitting sordid exhibitions as if nothing can be done. Whatever happened to adult guidance?

40 posted on 12/30/2006 8:14:15 PM PST by Sender ("How do you know what the fish think? You're not a fish." -Hui Zi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson