I assumed the same thing when "campaign finance reform" was going through congress. I guess the president assumed as I did because he signed the dammed thing, much to my dismay. I sailed through the judicial process and was upheld by the SCOTUS.
I wonder if Bush will sign this one.
/blush
Or, I might ask, "I wonder if Bush will squander this oppty to put the anti-Bush 'wiretapper whiners' back a step or two."
Let this pass, then Bush should step to the podium to address the protesters at Crawford and explain that he is vetoing the bill because it would inhibit them from freely protesting there against policies they disagree with.
Come out as a supporter of protesters' rights!
Say that he wants the government to tap the phones of terrorists, not wiretap American dissenters.
CNN/MSM would burn two weeks of air time trying to figure out what Bush's nefarious angle is.