Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KoRn; RayChuang88
I wonder if Bush will sign this one.

Or, I might ask, "I wonder if Bush will squander this oppty to put the anti-Bush 'wiretapper whiners' back a step or two."

Let this pass, then Bush should step to the podium to address the protesters at Crawford and explain that he is vetoing the bill because it would inhibit them from freely protesting there against policies they disagree with.

Come out as a supporter of protesters' rights!

Say that he wants the government to tap the phones of terrorists, not wiretap American dissenters.

CNN/MSM would burn two weeks of air time trying to figure out what Bush's nefarious angle is.

46 posted on 12/30/2006 8:51:12 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: sam_paine
Very good ideas all! I think everything you suggested would give the liberals and the media a huge case of brain-lock. Some of them may even have to seek counseling.
53 posted on 12/30/2006 8:59:33 AM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson