Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Iran's oil exports may disappear
Associated Press ^ | 12/25/06 | BARRY SCHWEID

Posted on 12/26/2006 10:49:30 AM PST by presidio9

Iran is suffering a staggering decline in revenue from its oil exports, and if the trend continues income could virtually disappear by 2015, according to an analysis published Monday in a journal of the National Academy of Sciences.

Iran's economic woes could make the country unstable and vulnerable, with its oil industry crippled, Roger Stern, an economic geographer at Johns Hopkins University, said in the report and in an interview.

Iran earns about $50 billion a year in oil exports. The decline is estimated at 10 to 12 percent annually. In less than five years exports could be halved and then disappear by 2015, Stern predicted.

For two decades, the United States has deployed military forces in the region in a strategy to pre-empt emergence of a regional superpower.

Iraq was stopped in the 1991 Persian Gulf War, but a hostile Iran remains a target of U.S. threats.

The U.S. military exercises have not stopped Iran's drive. But the report said the country could be destabilized by declining oil exports, hostility to foreign investment to develop new oil resources and poor state planning, Stern said.

Stern's analysis, which appears in this week's edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, supports U.S. and European suspicions that Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons in violation of international understandings. But, Stern says, there could be merit to Iran's assertion that it needs nuclear power for civilian purposes "as badly as it claims."

He said oil production is declining and both gas and oil are being sold domestically at highly subsidized rates. At the same time, Iran is neglecting to reinvest in its oil production.

"With an explosive demand at home and poor management, the appeal of nuclear power, financed by Russia, could fill a real need for production of more electricity."

Iran produces about 3.7 million barrels a day, about 300,000 barrels below the quota set for Iran by the oil cartel, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.

The shortfall represents a loss of about $5.5 billion a year, Stern said. In 2004, Iran's oil profits were 65 percent of the government's revenues.

"If we look at that shortfall, and failure to rectify leaks in their refineries, that adds up to a loss of about $10 billion to $11 billion a year," he said. "That is a picture of an industry in collapse."

If the United States can "hold its breath" for a few years it may find Iran a much more conciliatory country, he said. And that, Stern said, is good reason to belay any instinct to take on Iran militarily.

"What they are doing to themselves is much worse than anything we could do," he said.

"The one thing that would unite the country right now is to bomb them," Stern said. "Here is one problem that might solve itself."

___


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/26/2006 10:49:31 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Awwwwww, too bad for their crazy President.


2 posted on 12/26/2006 10:52:23 AM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Meanwhile Iraq oil exports are about 20 billion a year and increasing. If we stick it out in Iraq for 5 more years we will attain our goals.


3 posted on 12/26/2006 10:55:29 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I think bombing some oil terminals and oil fields would help them along quite nicely...
4 posted on 12/26/2006 10:55:41 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1758406/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1758363/posts


5 posted on 12/26/2006 10:57:29 AM PST by upchuck (How to win the WOT? Simple: set our rules of engagement to at least match those of our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"But, Stern says, there could be merit to Iran's assertion that it needs nuclear power for civilian purposes "as badly as it claims." "

I call BS on this, it is well known that Iran has far more gas than they do oil. Turbine engines run just fine on NG, Iran is exporting oil because the price is so high, but they have no shortage of energy for domestic electric production.

6 posted on 12/26/2006 10:58:47 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Iran is neglecting to reinvest in its oil production.

"With an explosive demand at home and poor management, the appeal of nuclear power, financed by Russia, could fill a real need for production of more electricity." "

They are pouring every 'euro' they have into making a nuke. If they don't succeed with nuclear technology their economy might collapse soon, especially if they suffer consistent equipment failure in the oil sector.
7 posted on 12/26/2006 11:24:35 AM PST by ritewingwarrior (Where does free speech end, and sedition begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

In addition, Iran refuses to allow controls over the supply of nuclear materials. With the right controls, it would be possible to generate nuclear power, without producing any material for a weapons program. If Iran were only interested in peaceful purposes, it would be promoting this option.


8 posted on 12/26/2006 12:14:27 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Is that the same Roger Stern who does the Superman comic books???


9 posted on 12/26/2006 12:40:35 PM PST by MLedeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Even the containment option could be tricky... at some point, ten years away according to this, Iran goes into energy debt. Shortly after that it's likely that either they invade an adjoining country to distract from internal woes or (equally bad) a local country (eg. Pakistan) takes over either by invasion or politcal/economic puppetry.


10 posted on 12/26/2006 2:52:32 PM PST by Partout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson