Posted on 12/20/2006 8:54:01 PM PST by paulat
Mother: Ferret, not pit bull, gnawed off baby's toes
BENTON, La. The parents of a month-old girl whose toes were gnawed off while they slept apparently disagree about whether the culprit was their ferret or their 6-week-old pit bull.
Mary Hansche, 22, told KTBS-TV on Tuesday that she thinks it was the ferret. "The way the bite marks were on her foot. The ferret being out of its cage. I knew it wasn't the dog," she said.
[snip]
"We were told that the puppy had blood on its fur. But when the officers arrived there, the animal did not have blood on its mouth," he said.
Natale said which animal did it won't affect charges against the Hansches, who were booked Dec. 10 on charges of child desertion and criminal negligence and remained jailed Wednesday in lieu of $50,000 bond each.
[snip]
Their daughter has been released from the hospital and is in state custody.
The Hansches were asleep on a mattress on the floor and the baby in a carrier next to the mattress when her cries woke them, police have said. They were not tested for alcohol or drugs, since such tests would not be needed to prove the charges, Natale said Wednesday.
Defense attorney Pam Smart said she is waiting for results of a hair analysis to back up the couple's statement that they were not using drugs.
[snip]
She also said their bonds are too high for misdemeanors. A bond reduction hearing is scheduled next month.
Both pets were released from quarantine but will remain in the Bossier City animal shelter until the court case is over, Natale said. Either the court or the city may decide their fate, he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...
Yes it does have a certain Twilight Zone air about it.
I tend to believe it was the ferret, since even a puupy-edition pit bull probably couldn't manage to bite off anything as small as a 1 month old baby's toes without taking off a whole lot more. But these parents must have been sleeping off a MAJOR meth run. A one month old baby would let out a massive howl at the first nibble on her toe (that is, assuming she'd been been fed within the past 24 hours and wasn't half-dead from malnourishment and dehydration), and she was right next to them! These parents are obviously the sort of people who shouldn't be allowed to own a ferret, much less a pit bull. Naturally our useless "justice" system won't have them sterilized, and they'll pop out their next little victim in short order.
I suspect you are right. My roommate had ferrets and they would come out from under the couch and bite my toes. Hated the F'ers.
I don't think that a ferret would go after a baby's toes but a 6 week old puppy would definitely be a target.
I disagree. My roomates ferrets were always biting mine. Finally they had to go.
And how did you come to that conclusion? Ferrets are predators that go for small rodents. That poor girls toes might have appeared as such.
I definitely agree with child endangerment by having animals loose around the baby without proper supervision but without knowing more about a ferret's behavior and chewing abilities, as well as the child's specific injuries, I can't go further than that. I'm not assuming that it took several minutes for the ferret to injure this child.
As for the pit bull comments, one rarely sees newspaper stories about poodles or daschunds biting children. It's not exactly sensational. Although, there was that pomeranian that killed a newborn baby a few years ago. Let's ban poms!
You think because someone recognizes the need to make pitbull ownership illegal has to be a liberal? lol...
funny....
you're a pit bull owner and your dogs are not dangerous? Great...you're the only one on the planet then. And every pit bull owner whose dogs maime or kill other people always have some lame excuse for why it happened. Blame the victim -- blame society -- blame people like me who actually think it's my JOB as a parent to make sure my children don't get eaten by pits who roam the neighbor, or walk along side a stupid idiotic owner carrying his leash, grinning at me while i tell him to put that dog on the leash NOW.
it's not your job to welcome me (or not) to FR. Do you know what FR stands for? The first word is "FREE" and i think it has something to do with the 1st Amendment. Have you heard of that?
BTW, I believe gunowners should be responsible with their weapons. But guns are inantimate objects, and will not shoot to kill on their own. You have NO control over your animal when that animal wants to attack something. I don't care how much you benchpress...you are powerless over that beast when it wants to charge. I have seen this happen myself, with a pit eating a cat. The owner, who thinks he's so buff, stands there helpless while his leashed pit tears right off that little thread and goes after its prey.
Pits do not deserve legal protection. People (and children) do. Don't mess with a momma who has fought to the death a system that allowed her four children to be neglected and abused by idiot birthparents, and who just adopted all 4 last week. My kids couldn't play in their own backyard for years with the birth family because of multiple pit bulls that the parents cared more about than my precious children.
they sound just like you, my friend.
I always said it was that nasty ferret. I hope the baby is going to be alright and that these stupid parents lose custody of her. They should not have children or animals. Prayers for the baby.
Seesh, you must live under a rock. There are hundreds of threads about that on FR alone.
And no, I won't dig them up. You wouldn't believe them anyway.
I feel sorry for those around you.
I have no horse (or dog) in this race but this thread is short on statistics and long on anecdote.
http://www.la-spca.org/dedication/talk/t_judge.htm
In 37 years, 342 children were killed by dogs, an average of about nine children a year. Shockingly, approximately three children are killed each day, or 1,100 per year, by their parents. Delise notes that "A child in the United States is over 100 times more likely to be killed by his or her parent or caretaker than by a dog."
Pit bull and pit mixes account for 21 percent of all human fatalities, while mixed breed dogs account for 16 percent and other nonspecified breeds, 15 percent. Delise's study demonstrates that the breed of dog should not be the sole factor by which an attack is judged. Other factors include inherited and learned behaviors, genetics, breeding, temperament, surgical sterilization, environmental stresses, owner responsibility, victim behavior, size and age, timing, and the physical condition and the size of dog.
The child HAD to be crying after the first shock!
How it could have continued....
_________________________
Parents were drugged out of their minds...losers.
I'll "mess with momma" all I like. You are an ignorant fool who has spent NO time with pits. NONE.
NONE. NONE.
I not only have pits, I have pit mixes who have been so badly abused by humans that they were set to be put down. But I gave them a chance.
Go ahead and feel ignorant and SMUG, but you do not know sh*t about this breed. NOTHING.
The toes were there, somewhere, because the TV news accounts said they tried to reattach them, but couldn't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.