Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Put Off Convention Decision Dec 19 6:07 PM US/Eastern
Drudge Report ^ | Dec 19 | By BETH FOUHY

Posted on 12/20/2006 5:51:22 AM PST by katdawg

NEW YORK

Democrats have put off a decision on choosing a 2008 national convention site until early January, hard-pressed to pick between Denver and New York, officials said Tuesday.

Party officials have been negotiating for months with host committees for New York and Denver, but a series of problems with Denver's bid _ and a significant cooling of interest from New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg _ led Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean to seek more time to make a decision.

"Chairman Dean is going to make the best decision for the party based on the merits of each city's bid. ... Because of the holiday week, and at the request of both cities, we will announce the convention city in early January," DNC press secretary Stacie Paxton said in a statement.

Denver, which has mounted an enthusiastic campaign to win the convention, has struggled with labor issues, fundraising and logistical challenges such as finding sufficient hotel rooms. Democrats thought Denver had resolved some of its labor problems when Colorado's AFL-CIO approved a resolution last month in support of Denver's convention bid.

But problems suddenly emerged this week when Jim Taylor, head of city's influential stagehand union, refused to sign an agreement promising not to strike if the convention came to Denver.

Debbie Willhite, executive director of Denver's host committee, said a lack of full union support for the city's bid is "probably a deal- breaker" but expressed confidence the matter could be negotiated.

The problems are different in New York, which hosted the 2004 Republican National Convention and eagerly sought the 2008 Democratic gathering as recently as a few months ago. Since then, Bloomberg has committed to several other multimillion-dollar fundraising efforts, including creation of the city's World Trade Center memorial.

While New York's host committee has pledged to raise the money necessary to hold the convention, Bloomberg said Tuesday that the fundraising would be significantly more difficult than he once believed.

"The city can't go on the hook for a convention unless they're reasonably sure they can raise the money," he said, noting that New York had financed the 2004 convention entirely through private fundraising.

"We'd like conventions to come here and spend money and be a net positive for this city, so while it was in the last case because we financed it all privately, I'm not sure we could do that again," he said.

The convention _ which is expected to attract 35,000 people, including 4,950 delegates and alternates _ will be held from Aug. 25-28 after the Summer Olympics in Beijing.

The Republican National Convention will start just 4 days later, on Sept. 1 in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn.

Denver last hosted the Democratic National Convention in 1908, when Democrats nominated William Jennings Bryan in his third unsuccessful effort as the party's standard-bearer. But many Democrats have said the selection of Denver this time would make a powerful statement about the party's recent resurgence in the Rocky Mountain West.

New York has other advantages, including a winning track record with Democrats. The last two Democrats to occupy the Oval Office were first nominated in New York _ Jimmy Carter in 1976 and Bill Clinton in 1992.

New York also has several powerful allies, most notably Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, the prospective front-runner for the party's presidential nomination. The state's other senator, Chuck Schumer, led the successful effort by Democrats in November's midterm election to retake control of the Senate.

___

Associated Press Writers Sara Kugler in New York, Jon Sarche in Denver and Joan Lowy in Washington contributed to this report.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
"Chairman Dean is going to make the best decision for the party based on the merits of each city's bid"

Wait a minute, which part of Chairman Dean and making the best decision go together?

1 posted on 12/20/2006 5:51:24 AM PST by katdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: katdawg
Debbie Willhite, executive director of Denver's host committee, said a lack of full union support for the city's bid is "probably a deal- breaker" but expressed confidence the matter could be negotiated.

Aint' that special .. The Union Boys are even driving the Dems away

2 posted on 12/20/2006 5:58:49 AM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katdawg

Choose New Orleans!


3 posted on 12/20/2006 6:03:15 AM PST by Ellesu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katdawg

It will be New York. Hillary runs that party.


4 posted on 12/20/2006 6:03:22 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katdawg

Detroit would be a wonderful place to showcase Democratic Party success.


5 posted on 12/20/2006 6:06:54 AM PST by N. Theknow ((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katdawg

I heard Bloomberg say (in politico speak) on 1010 WINS this morning that he basically doesn't want the dem convention in New York. I hope the dems hold their gathering in Denver, the city does not have the facilities to host that many people, it will be a logistic nightmare and should make for some humorous moments.


6 posted on 12/20/2006 6:07:23 AM PST by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Ugh Hitlery....


7 posted on 12/20/2006 6:08:18 AM PST by katdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Aint' that special .. The Union Boys are even driving the Dems away.

They are "negotiating". It depends on how much graft the union bosses get offered.

8 posted on 12/20/2006 6:10:38 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

Let's see, the Kennedy wing of the DNC won the last bid for the convention, when the Clinton wing wanted NYC. The odds of Bloomberg getting the best of her hilleriness this time are nil. I would not be surprised to learn that the head of the stagehands union in Denver just got a bank error in his favor of many thousands of $$ as an incentive to be obstructionist.


9 posted on 12/20/2006 6:13:35 AM PST by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Hey, I am not complaining. Thousands of loony Dems converging on the city -- yikes! I live in the metro area.

Seriously, it could be a nice money maker for the city. And I wouldn't mind that much since I don't live in the city.

I heard that the city of Denver needed to chip in around 20 million dollars. They weren't able to raise the funds.

This may be the real reason -- money.
10 posted on 12/20/2006 6:17:44 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Seriously, it could be a nice money maker for the city.

Big events like conventions, super bowls, etc do not make money for the host cities. They end up wasting more on "cleanup" prior to the event.

11 posted on 12/20/2006 6:23:01 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: katdawg
Chairman Dean is going to make the best decision for the party...

Jeez; 30 years ago it used to read

Chairman Mao is going to make the best decision for the party....

how ironic...
12 posted on 12/20/2006 6:27:32 AM PST by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

I was thinking more for Denver businesses.

Guess that means tax revenue for the city, too.


13 posted on 12/20/2006 6:29:02 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

More Tax Revenue and disgusting Dems to go along with it!


14 posted on 12/20/2006 6:30:49 AM PST by katdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: katdawg
I'm hearing rumors that this years DNC might have a little international flavor, here are the finalist cities:

1.) Havana
2.) Caracas
3.) Tehran
4.) Moscow
5.) San Francisco
15 posted on 12/20/2006 6:31:42 AM PST by adm5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

hope so. Don't want them in Denver.


16 posted on 12/20/2006 7:20:08 AM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than we will ever know. Thanks, Rush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maica

Maybe Soros will put the money up for an NYC convention, that is if he supports Hillary.


17 posted on 12/20/2006 9:01:45 AM PST by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson