To: mthom
You suggest we meet mexican demand for immigration instead of enforcing immigration law at the border. You must know that the country will not go along with unlimited immigration. So if your desired solution were adopted immigration from the rest of the world would not be increased and likely reduced. How "pro-immigrant". Actually, I'm suggesting that you quit fooling yourself that it's a security, rather than an economic issue. Re-read the prior post. Or, don't bother. You've got your pigeonhole, why think?
78 posted on
12/18/2006 3:59:57 PM PST by
arnoldfwilliams
(If it were, it would be: if it could be, it might be; but, as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.)
To: arnoldfwilliams
I never claimed it was security. "Quit bothering the border patrol with immigration" Is clear in its suggestion a particular policy and I was referring to that policy.
80 posted on
12/18/2006 4:10:16 PM PST by
mthom
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson