Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mthom
You suggest we meet mexican demand for immigration instead of enforcing immigration law at the border. You must know that the country will not go along with unlimited immigration. So if your desired solution were adopted immigration from the rest of the world would not be increased and likely reduced. How "pro-immigrant".

Actually, I'm suggesting that you quit fooling yourself that it's a security, rather than an economic issue. Re-read the prior post. Or, don't bother. You've got your pigeonhole, why think?

78 posted on 12/18/2006 3:59:57 PM PST by arnoldfwilliams (If it were, it would be: if it could be, it might be; but, as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: arnoldfwilliams
I never claimed it was security. "Quit bothering the border patrol with immigration" Is clear in its suggestion a particular policy and I was referring to that policy.
80 posted on 12/18/2006 4:10:16 PM PST by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson