To: Silly
And of course, we all know that only Latinos can penetrate our southern borderAt 15 a year (Tuscon jurisdiction), you're using too many people to catch them. If that is your focus, there are better ways to do it. Quit distracting the Border Patrol with immigration. Unless you think that they should all be there to catch one.
69 posted on
12/18/2006 1:45:12 PM PST by
arnoldfwilliams
(If it were, it would be: if it could be, it might be; but, as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.)
To: arnoldfwilliams
Quit distracting the Border Patrol with immigration. We need more, not less, integration and cooperation of agencies, imho. Seperating BP from IMM is like seperating the FBI from the CIA.
71 posted on
12/18/2006 1:49:36 PM PST by
Silly
(for my serious side, visit sarcasmoff.com)
To: arnoldfwilliams
"Quit distracting the Border Patrol with immigration."
You suggest we meet mexican demand for immigration instead of enforcing immigration law at the border. You must know that the country will not go along with unlimited immigration. So if your desired solution were adopted immigration from the rest of the world would not be increased and likely reduced. How "pro-immigrant".
74 posted on
12/18/2006 2:02:25 PM PST by
mthom
To: arnoldfwilliams
Quit distracting the Border Patrol with immigration. Unless you think that they should all be there to catch one.The only way to do that would be to eliminate them. That's their job. How did you arrive at that statement?
89 posted on
12/19/2006 4:07:12 AM PST by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson