Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA S.O.S: Save Our Science!
http://planetary.org/programs/projects/sos/petition2.html ^

Posted on 12/15/2006 9:08:45 AM PST by truthfinder9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2006 9:08:48 AM PST by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
Ok, I am lost. I thought the President was moving for a very aggressive exploration and scientific agenda for NASA? That whole Moon to Mars thing. Or is this just some group who wants to attack the President even though he supports their outward goals.
2 posted on 12/15/2006 9:11:06 AM PST by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker

The President was moving for a very aggressive exploration, but the proposed budget dosn't support that agrressive plan. We're too busy spending money on bridges to nowhere.


3 posted on 12/15/2006 9:13:52 AM PST by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Wars are pretty expensive too.


4 posted on 12/15/2006 9:18:04 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

I have an idea. Let the scientists that think their work is so important, petition for private funding, or pay for it themselves.


5 posted on 12/15/2006 9:18:31 AM PST by Beagle8U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

NASA has done more than enough exploration and science to last for centuries. It is time to start using that quasi-valuable knowledge by establishing human outposts on the moon and Mars. Either that or repeal the Treaty so space development can begin.


6 posted on 12/15/2006 9:20:59 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
I'm not concerned at all with NASA's need of finances. They are a PRIVATE company that for years has received PUBLIC money. They have become so fat with public money over the years they have abandoned finance philosophies that govern private companies. They spend unaccountable millions and millions on experiments that will benefit no one.

Richard Branson (Virgin Air) launched two successive missions to space within 10 days of each. Thereby, demonstrating for all to see, the wastefulness and inefficiency of NASA. NASA can barely launch 2 mission within 6 months.

It's time to let REAL private companies lead the way to space and planetary exploration and let unaccountable slushes like NASA go the way of the dinosaur.

NASA will get no tears from me.
7 posted on 12/15/2006 9:21:29 AM PST by Arcy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
The President was moving for a very aggressive exploration, but the proposed budget dosn't support that agrressive plan.

So is the problem the President or Congress? Seems like we're petitioning the wrong people.

8 posted on 12/15/2006 9:21:41 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Bingo! Thank you...


9 posted on 12/15/2006 9:21:51 AM PST by Mazda3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

AMEN!


10 posted on 12/15/2006 9:22:12 AM PST by Arcy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Is it better to earmark or to simply hand $400 million over to each State to spend on any whim they may have?


11 posted on 12/15/2006 9:22:18 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
It is sad that even as we fight the genocidal philosophy of Islamofascism that the politicians still saddle the budget with so much political pork. The discretionary spending authorization of the President is a truly minuscule portion of the overall budget. The non-discretionary spending is grotesquely huge (NASA and the Military are part of discretionary spending). The IRS's "overhead" and miscalculations alone (equal to 25%+ of revenues taken in) could pay for a fleet of long range spacecraft and still keep us from deficit spending.

Real pork is great (esp with BBQ sauce), Political "Pork" kills. It is amazing that even after all we have been through, all congress can think of is their back pocket. Maybe we should start by taking away their tax free lifetime "pension" that they get after serving a term or two.
12 posted on 12/15/2006 9:23:40 AM PST by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arcy

Repeal the Treaty or sit and watch NASA and the rest of the internationalists conduct their pitiful space operations.


13 posted on 12/15/2006 9:24:19 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arcy

By the way, you have used the word 'private' in a highly unusual way. The word 'public' is used in many ways every day, and few have actually figured out what the specific meanings actually are, but 'private' seems clear enough most of the time.


14 posted on 12/15/2006 9:26:53 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

If the Chinese establish control of the Lunar water-ice deposits before the USA does then they will control access to the greater solar-system for centuries. The lunar ice has the strategic importance of Gibraltar and the Panama Canal rolled into one, as far as the future use-of-space goes.


15 posted on 12/15/2006 9:27:45 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
This effort by the Saganite Planetary Society has nothing whatsoever to do with science -- it's all about saving the academic community's entitlement.

The "Go-to-Mars-to-look-for-pond-scum" crowd is no longer setting the long-range strategic agenda for the agency -- and they resent it.

16 posted on 12/15/2006 9:28:43 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Reason enough to end NASA.

17 posted on 12/15/2006 9:34:57 AM PST by Arcy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

That wonderful space station. What a boon(doggle) to science that is.


18 posted on 12/15/2006 9:37:12 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

It's better not to extract the $400 million from the state in the first place.


19 posted on 12/15/2006 9:39:07 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DManA

In the case of Alaska, getting the $400 million returned to the State is making up for a fraction of the funds that are taken from the State and given to, for example, Louisiana.


20 posted on 12/15/2006 9:41:02 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson