[Red6]

You're full of shit, and I'll tell you why. When the story was headline news, Der Spiegel didn't run it. Two days later, when it's in all other MSM outlets they run with it. Why? Because just like when Bush was elected, they have to at that point.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236678,00.html

At this point, it's being reported by all major media outlets, can Der Spiegel really afford "not" to cover the story? No.

But while people were being executed in broad day light by gunmen, Der Spiegel had a "major story" on some no name company, that had a no name game, which isn't in any store, is hardly selling, and barely known. And the basic message of their story was? Those crazy fanatical American Christians!

[Schweinhund]

You're still not getting it. Those 2 items - the gunman story and the video game - are not interchangable. The Spiegel homepage is set up somewhat like a newspaper: The first 30 items are the headline section. Below are the regular back sections of the magazine: Panorama, Politics, Sport, Economy Science, Culture and NETWORLD. 'Left Behind' did not appear in the headline section. It appeared in the networld section. So your whole point with the gaza story is totally irrelevant, because the gaza story is not networld news anyway. I'm definitely full of shit because this must be the third time I'm trying to tell you that. I'm wasting my time on a moron, that is even worse than being one myself. So, this is my last post on this topic.