Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie
I want to tell you something. I am not a Pat Buchanan supporter. I voted for the Bush's four times. I voted for our good republican senator in this last election and he lost because of the behavior of GWB. But I am not clueless like these automatons on this site that have adopted G W Bush as their deity. I certainly do not want Hillary but if we are now relegated to a democrat (which I truly believe we are) in the next election I would rather have her than any other democrat contender. As for being clueless, it was the hopelessly and politically clueless Bushbots who hid their head in the sand during this last election and confidently predicted the election of a republican congress that deserve that definition. I asked that those who demonstrated that poltically cluelessness to refrain from commenting on my post and that is just the type that did. It seems that the Bush worshipers just can not get enough of his betrayal of the conservative cause (with the one exception of some judicial appointments.) And I might venture to add that we have seen the last of conservative appointments in the courts or elsewhere. I have said before and I say now, nuts do not fall far from the tree or bush and this one proves the case. I predict here and now that he will consent to raise taxes just as did his father. He will pursue the "stay the course" in Iraq to the ruination of his administration because he believes it to be his destiny to use American armed forces to force liberty on others whether they wish to fight for it or not. He will cater to the left from this day forward because he has no conservative principles.

The Bushbots will excuse any action he takes, from the appointment of George Mitchell to the UN to his endorsement of granting citizenship to millions of illegal aliens in the headlong rush to deify this man. I don't want Hillary but I truly believe she will stand up against the most radical in her party because she has a mind of her own. If the islamofactists attack this country while she is president I think she will react with a speed that no other democrat would.

We are in a no win position right now, we just must try to confine our losses and to do that we need to divorce ourselves from GWB.
503 posted on 12/04/2006 11:58:10 AM PST by brydic1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]


To: brydic1

Please shut up already!


508 posted on 12/04/2006 12:00:26 PM PST by OldFriend (FALLEN HERO JEFFREY TOCZYLOWSKI, REST IN PEACE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

He's baaaaaack!


509 posted on 12/04/2006 12:01:26 PM PST by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: brydic1
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
515 posted on 12/04/2006 12:09:13 PM PST by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: brydic1

"I certainly do not want Hillary but if we are now relegated to a democrat (which I truly believe we are) in the next election I would rather have her than any other democrat contender"

Oh really now?

This woman (Hillary) was in the very unique position to be an incoming senator and former first lady in 2001. As former first lady, she had knowledge of the threat of islamic terror as did her husband, the president. As a senator, she could have acted to pass strong legislation to protect borders, ports and to give law enforcement and intelligence officials the tools they need to thwart attacks. But did she? NO She didn't! And, after 9/11 what did she do? She marched her fat butt to the Senate floor spouting that "Bush Knew" crap. Excuse my french, but, how you can call this woman worthy of the presidency is beyond me.


516 posted on 12/04/2006 12:09:20 PM PST by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: brydic1
"I don't want Hillary, but, I truly believe she will stand up against the most radical in her party because she has a mind of her own"

Michael Savage-is that you?

Of course- by all means- the way to further the Conservative agenda is to vote for Hugo Chavez in a dress.

We should not only vote for Hillary"We're going to take things away from you for the common good"-Clinton- We should volunteer to drive democrats to the polls. Yeh, that's the way to win one for conservatives. (ROFL)

518 posted on 12/04/2006 12:17:59 PM PST by Pajamajan (Pray for president Bush-pray for our military-pray for our congress-pray for our nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: brydic1
I asked that those who demonstrated that poltically cluelessness to refrain from commenting on my post and that is just the type that did.

Nice attitude. I want to post a comment, but don't want anyone except those that agree with me to respond.

I nominate you for Post of the Day!

Please define political cluelessness. Who would you say did a worse job since 2004, the President or the Republican-Controlled Congress?

Your good Republican Senator did NOT lose because of the actions of GWB. The same MSM that has torn down the President and numbed your brain into thinking that the mission Iraq is not a worthy mission also convinced your state that embryonic stem cell research was the cure all to every last disease and that a cure for Michael J. Fox will be found within the next year.

And now you want to come on here and say that we should bow to the feet of Hillary because we lost one election? You say that we should bow to her because she has a backbone and integrity? You claim to be a Supporter of the Conservative Movement but you want to give Hillary the reins to this country? You are insane. Debating you would be an effort in futility. Go on and support Hillary. See where THAT takes the conservative movement. Prepare yourself for the New Deal on Steroids!!!

Standing up for our troops, standing up for the mission in Iraq and standing up against those who if given the chance would have attacked us daily is NOT being a BUSHBOT.

If you want to blame someone for destroying the conservative movement, which I truly believe that you are just here to stir up the pudding, BLAME THE REPUBLICAN-CONTROLLED CONGRESS for not supporting a President who was brave enough to take on the Social Security Establishment with ZERO HELP from Congress.

And PLEASE do not come on here and say that we are in a NO WIN POSITION ever again!!
523 posted on 12/04/2006 12:33:03 PM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Sorry soldiers.....your country let you down on November 7.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: brydic1

I noticed that you have decided not to respond to EITHER of my posts to you. What's wrong? Hillary got your tongue?

You are just a Drive-By poster and nothing else.


545 posted on 12/05/2006 5:48:21 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Sorry soldiers.....your country let you down on November 7.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson