Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GoLightly

The dressing could not be soft cast chalk- with the blowing sand from the desert next door it would be eroded away in a nick of time. If anything, the pyramid exterior needed to have been made of the hardest materials available, for the whole point of having a pyramid is its extreme durability. To cast the pyramid interior [the bulk of its volume] would take a lot. And allowing the soft castings to settle and harden to the depth of the pyramid dimension would take longer than the whole reign.


121 posted on 12/02/2006 12:52:42 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: GSlob
My point had to do with a reduced need for the quantities of kilned lime you had assumed, at which point we're not talking soft cast chalk, but a form of concrete.
122 posted on 12/02/2006 12:58:53 PM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: GSlob

Did you read the article?

The theory is that limestone concrete (limestone slurry mixed with lime from ash and salt) was used near the top of the pyramids. The pyramids were covered with a veneer of limestone slabs originally, IIRC, and are long gone. Recycled into other stuff.


124 posted on 12/02/2006 2:59:34 PM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson