Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NEPA

What about if you drink? Waht about if you get a speeding ticket? What about if you have guns in your house? What about if you're 150 lbs overweight? What if you're only 50 lbs overweight?

All those could be deemed within the right of a company to regulate since all those things according to current PC thought could make you a high risk employee. Would you agree to firing on any of those grounds?


28 posted on 11/29/2006 3:35:01 PM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: saganite
How about a few to get liberals panties in a twist?

Homosexuality has been already been suggested.
A vegan diet is unnatural and unhealthy.
Neither eating nor drinking during daylight hours for a month poses health and safety risks.

39 posted on 11/29/2006 3:42:42 PM PST by magslinger (When Law enforcement enforce idiotic Laws of Bad Politicians there are no good guys.-Phantom Patriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: saganite
As I said I don't agree with the policy but it is a private company. They have a responsibility to the shareholders to hold down costs and maximize profits. The policy is all about the bottom line.

The year 2000 was a transition year in which Scotts, Miracle Gro, Ortho, and Round Up merged following buy outs in the 90's. It wasn't a very good year and in late 2000 there was a complete restructuring and the company, under Hagedorn, seemed to become much more frugal where employee costs were concerned (I was terminated, rehired with no benefits and can't get them back because I get laid off for a few weeks which makes me a seasonal employee). There's also a lot more job stress and pressure to be competitive not just in the marketplace but with other employees.

This is where the smoking policy comes in. In my opinion it's a Hagedorn thing about money and competition and his desire to present some kind of ideal picture of the company. I wouldn't be surprised if the next target will be overweight employees if he can show overweight employees cost the company more money in health or other costs.

I liked the company a lot better before Hagedorn but the shareholders probably love him.

49 posted on 11/29/2006 4:12:47 PM PST by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: saganite

No those things should not weigh in on somebody's employment.

My philosophy is this : Show up to work on time. Give it your best. And if your best isn't good enough, you're fired.


114 posted on 11/29/2006 5:40:28 PM PST by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: saganite
What about if you drink? Waht about if you get a speeding ticket? What about if you have guns in your house? What about if you're 150 lbs overweight? What if you're only 50 lbs overweight?

When you make an EMPLOYER responsible for your health care...that's what you get. If you have an account you CONTROL it's another matter.

204 posted on 11/30/2006 12:56:51 AM PST by paulat (about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: saganite

it won't be 50lbs over wieght, it will be 20 or less, at least that's what they are doing at a company here in okemos, mi.

get to your proper wieght or you're gone.

so all you folks out there who have had a hard time losing wieght better realize your job may soon depend on it

:)


212 posted on 11/30/2006 1:15:18 AM PST by rickylc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson