Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New U.S. dollar coins hide 'In God We Trust'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Nov. 27, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 11/27/2006 11:02:39 AM PST by News Hunter

"In God We Trust," the official national motto since 1956 and a familiar sight on U.S. coins and currency, will be hard to find on the new presidential dollar coins scheduled for release to the public Feb. 15, 2007.

The new gold-colored dollar pieces, featuring images of U.S. presidents, will move the inscription from the face of the coin to the thin edge, along with the year and the previous national motto, "E Pluribus Unum," Latin for "Out of Many, One."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: churchandstate; dollar; god; ibleeive; ingodwetrust; worldnetdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-287 next last
To: tyke

I was an atheist. Of course at the time I would vehemently deny that was the reason. But after I found Christ, I realized that was the original reason I was a deranged zealot.


181 posted on 11/27/2006 4:55:33 PM PST by Crazieman (The Democratic Party: Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
AIDS can be controlled mostly by keeping certain parts of your personal anatomy under your clothing.

Not to mention maintaining a monogamous relationship with your spouse.

182 posted on 11/27/2006 4:58:38 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier back in the "SandBox")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

There are two common phrases that seriously offend me: One is "God d____" and the other is a certain "F" word. I really am bothered by these moronic terms and yet not one person seems to give a rat if it bothers me. Here's the irony: I GET OVER IT!! As others should with offensive comments.


183 posted on 11/27/2006 4:59:42 PM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
As others should with offensive comments.

What's Free Republic for then?

184 posted on 11/27/2006 5:01:46 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (Unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnite
"laus deo" is written on the top of the Capitol.

Nothing in DC may be built above that.

HF

185 posted on 11/27/2006 5:02:07 PM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Raymann

"..it's a constitutional republic where indivisual rights are what matters not what >50% of the people say."

United States Constitution:

Legislative Powers: Section 8. The Congress shall have power to .......
To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;

Your individual rights don't trump the Legislative power to coin money; the elected officials by the MAJORITY do.


186 posted on 11/27/2006 5:05:37 PM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse

A free republic allows me to be offended and GET OVER IT, like I said before. More people should.


187 posted on 11/27/2006 5:11:01 PM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse

I don't remember saying what you wrote in red, and I wasn't talking to you.


188 posted on 11/27/2006 5:12:44 PM PST by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter

This is done to prepare the sheep for the total removal of the words, in a few years when we will have gotten used to it being missing.


189 posted on 11/27/2006 5:13:10 PM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
A free republic allows me to be offended and GET OVER IT, like I said before. More people should

Easy there.....the only point I was making is that we all post here because we dislike something.

190 posted on 11/27/2006 5:13:17 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (Unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

Are you equating me with that goddamn commie lovin' piece of socialist liberal filth?






...cause I'm not!


191 posted on 11/27/2006 5:13:55 PM PST by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Raymann
I don't remember saying what you wrote in red, and I wasn't talking to you.

Sorry, I missed the impenetrable force field around your text.

Every post is fair game here. Try not to be offended by that.

192 posted on 11/27/2006 5:14:51 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (Unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks

I was talking about what should be. If I thought something was unconstitutional then damnit I would say unconstitutional.

I'd love to know what you consider an individual right. Anyone who advocates that the majority should always get its way is promoting a DICTATORSHIP! There is no difference between giving one man absolute power and giving the 51% that same power.


193 posted on 11/27/2006 5:18:52 PM PST by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan; All
[Modern America: They tyranny of the minority.]

Yes, sometimes it does appear that way, so sad.

American culture has changed a lot since 1956 and mostly, not for the better. Sean Hannity happened to comment on the new study out that says close to 40% of babies are now born to unwed mothers. Hannity noted that back in 1961, when he was born, that figure was closer to 5%. Perhaps there is a direct correlation to the elimination of God from our culture and the abysmal moral climate.
194 posted on 11/27/2006 5:25:02 PM PST by khnyny (God Bless the Republic for which it stands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Raymann; He Rides A White Horse

He wasn't claiming you said what he wrote in red. In fact, he wasn't claiming anyone said what he wrote in red. The red text was his own words replacing those of mine in my post. And, if you don't know by now, anything posted here at FR is free game for comments by others. It doesn't matter whether someone was "talking" to someone else in order to receive comments about what one writes. Can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.


195 posted on 11/27/2006 5:29:46 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier back in the "SandBox")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

Amen!


196 posted on 11/27/2006 5:31:12 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier back in the "SandBox")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
There are two common phrases that seriously offend me: One is "God d____" and the other is a certain "F" word. I really am bothered by these moronic terms and yet not one person seems to give a rat if it bothers me. Here's the irony: I GET OVER IT!! As others should with offensive comments.

I can understand how those words/phrases can offend you or anyone else who feels the same about the use of such language. However, I hardly see where the phrase "In God We Trust" is equivalent with those others. I also see no harm in having these words printed on our currency, or even spoken in public. Those other words/phrases are usually spoken to invoke at least a perceived harm. And, no one has yet shown me where in the U.S. Constitution it is written that people of this country have a protection against being "offended" by what someone prints/writes/speaks that doesn't cause someone any damage.

197 posted on 11/27/2006 5:44:25 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier back in the "SandBox")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse; SoldierDad

Of course you can, unlike ya'll however I don't have the time to read back through 200 post to see where you're coming from. You can jump in but why you would expect anything beyond a dismissal is beyond me.


198 posted on 11/27/2006 5:45:10 PM PST by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Raymann

I would hardly call my comments "jumping in". And, a dismissal from you means little.


199 posted on 11/27/2006 5:53:16 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier back in the "SandBox")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Why is it that whenever a Christian stands up for his or her rights, it's almost always considered a "kneejerk reaction" anyway!?

I'm sorry. I'm missing something here. How is having your beliefs engraved on national coinage a "right?"

200 posted on 11/27/2006 6:11:53 PM PST by Junior (Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-287 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson