Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Home Schools Run By Well-Meaning Amateurs
NEA ^ | By Dave Arnold

Posted on 11/27/2006 7:04:44 AM PST by meandog

Schools With Good Teachers Are Best-Suited to Shape Young Minds

There's nothing like having the right person with the right experience, skills and tools to accomplish a specific task. Certain jobs are best left to the pros, such as, formal education.

There are few homeowners who can tackle every aspect of home repair. A few of us might know carpentry, plumbing and, let’s say, cementing. Others may know about electrical work, tiling and roofing. But hardly anyone can do it all.

Same goes for cars. Not many people have the skills and knowledge to perform all repairs on the family car. Even if they do, they probably don’t own the proper tools. Heck, some people have their hands full just knowing how to drive.

So, why would some parents assume they know enough about every academic subject to home-school their children? You would think that they might leave this -- the shaping of their children’s minds, careers, and futures -- to trained professionals. That is, to those who have worked steadily at their profession for 10, 20, 30 years! Teachers!

Experienced Pros

There’s nothing like having the right person with the right experience, skills and tools to accomplish a specific task. Whether it is window-washing, bricklaying or designing a space station. Certain jobs are best left to the pros. Formal education is one of those jobs.

Of course there are circumstances that might make it necessary for parents to teach their children at home. For example, if the child is severely handicapped and cannot be transported safely to a school, or is bedridden with a serious disease, or lives in such a remote area that attending a public school is near impossible.

Well-Meaning Amateurs

The number of parents who could easily send their children to public school but opt for home-schooling instead is on the increase. Several organizations have popped up on the Web to serve these wannabe teachers. These organizations are even running ads on prime time television. After viewing one advertisement, I searched a home school Web site. This site contains some statements that REALLY irritate me!

“It’s not as difficult as it looks.”

The “it” is meant to be “teaching.” Let’s face it, teaching children is difficult even for experienced professionals. Wannabes have no idea.

“What about socialization? Forget about it!”

Forget about interacting with others? Are they nuts? Socialization is an important component of getting along in life. You cannot teach it. Children should have the opportunity to interact with others their own age. Without allowing their children to mingle, trade ideas and thoughts with others, these parents are creating social misfits.

If this Web site encouraged home-schooled children to join after-school clubs at the local school, or participate in sports or other community activities, then I might feel different. Maine state laws, for example, require local school districts to allow home-schooled students to participate in their athletic programs. For this Web site to declare, “forget about it,” is bad advice.

When I worked for Wal-Mart more than 20 years ago, Sam Walton once told me: “I can teach Wal-Mart associates how to use a computer, calculator, and how to operate like retailers. But I can’t teach them how to be a teammate when they have never been part of any team.”

“Visit our online bookstore.”

Buying a history, science or math book does not mean an adult can automatically instruct others about the book’s content.

Gullible Parents

Another Web site asks for donations and posts newspaper articles pertaining to problems occurring in public schools.

It’s obvious to me that these organizations are in it for the money. They are involved in the education of children mostly in the hope of profiting at the hands of well-meaning but gullible parents.

This includes parents who home-school their children for reasons that may be linked to religious convictions. One Web site that I visited stated that the best way to combat our nation’s “ungodly” public schools was to remove students from them and teach them at home or at a Christian school.

I’m certainly not opposed to religious schools, or to anyone standing up for what they believe in. I admire anyone who has the strength to stand up against the majority. But in this case, pulling children out of a school is not the best way to fight the laws that govern our education system. No battle has ever been won by retreating!

No Training

Don’t most parents have a tough enough job teaching their children social, disciplinary and behavioral skills? They would be wise to help their children and themselves by leaving the responsibility of teaching math, science, art, writing, history, geography and other subjects to those who are knowledgeable, trained and motivated to do the best job possible.

(Dave Arnold, a member of the Illinois Education Association, is head custodian at Brownstown Elementary School in Southern Illinois.)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: allyourkids; arebelongtonea; barfarama; barfariver; condescending; cowcollegedummies; custodian; duhlookatthesource; elitists; homeschooling; libindoctrination; neapropaganda; propagandpaidforbyu; publicschool; weownyou
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900901-908 next last
To: Borges
It's perfectly reasonable.

*Says you.

It's called the Intentional fallacy and it was put forward in the 1930s or so by a group of American critics called the Southern Agrarians. All oustponekly conservative and Christian.

*They were lovely men. They were not infallible nor is their theory indefectible

881 posted on 12/04/2006 1:32:01 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Hmmmmnnnhhh...well...

A 'sensibility' discovering its sense of expanse.

OK.

And how is that art, precisely?

882 posted on 12/04/2006 1:42:42 PM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic
I didn't say it's 'indefectible'. I said it's a legitimate concept. Freudians, among others, will tell you that a writer is not always in full control of his intentions and will reveal things based on assumptions he didn't know he holds. That's why a 3rd rate dime novel from the 1930s can tell us so much about the era. Look at how many interpretations of Hamlet there are. Do you think Shakespeare intended all of them? Every generation has found something new in it and many other great works of literature. That's as it should be.
883 posted on 12/04/2006 1:51:36 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 881 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic
Actually was there even a focus on English language lit when Mag was a child? English Langauge Literature as a legimative subject for academic study only really took in the 1910s and 1920s.
884 posted on 12/04/2006 1:53:54 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Author explained exegesis.

Reader imposed eisegesis

Which is more likely valid?

885 posted on 12/04/2006 1:54:47 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 883 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic

The point is that her readings of the stories are subject to the same scrutiny as anyone else's. She can't just make grand claims that aren't supportible by the text and claim that she can't be questioned because she's the writer.


886 posted on 12/04/2006 1:55:45 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic
Which is more likely valid?

Depends on who brings forth better evidence to support their claims. And then the two interpreatations duke it out in the marketplace of ideas. If there was just one and only way to read a poem it wouldn't be a very good poem.
887 posted on 12/04/2006 1:57:25 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies]

To: Borges

OL' Walt supported Mag the Scag


888 posted on 12/04/2006 1:59:12 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
And how is that art, precisely?

How is Art the other way around? You asked how he revolutionized verse. That's how. You don't have to like him. He's not my favorite American poet. Give me Dickinson.
889 posted on 12/04/2006 1:59:34 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 882 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic
OL' Walt supported Mag the Scag

Whitman or Disney?
890 posted on 12/04/2006 2:00:16 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 888 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic

Coincidentally, as nice as his novels are, if you ever look at some of H.G. Wells's socio-ehtnic musings it reads like Mein Kampf.


891 posted on 12/04/2006 2:01:41 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 888 | View Replies]

To: Borges

There is also a marketplace for women as prostitutes. Did God intend persons to be used as commodities?


892 posted on 12/04/2006 2:04:05 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I read Chesterton before reading Wells, and so I was spoiled :)


893 posted on 12/04/2006 2:05:18 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 891 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic

Wow that's some convoluted logic! It's an intellectual market not a commercial one.


894 posted on 12/04/2006 2:06:19 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 892 | View Replies]

To: Borges

it goes to the idea of "intent"


895 posted on 12/04/2006 2:07:19 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 894 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Your idea is intent is not probitive


896 posted on 12/04/2006 2:08:41 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 894 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Joann P. Krieg - Walt Whitman and the Prostitutes - Literature and ...Walt Whitman supported Dr. Sanger, but he was part of a small minority. Nothing was done during the 1850s to regulate prostitution in New York City. ...


897 posted on 12/04/2006 2:09:04 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 890 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic

One would have to grant an author a Deity-level status over their work with disagreements tantamount to sin. If you bring a Supreme Being into this...


898 posted on 12/04/2006 2:09:07 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic

Which Dr. Sanger? Whitman died when Mag Sanger was 13 years old.


899 posted on 12/04/2006 2:11:31 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 897 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Who best knows Creation? The Author of Creation

or the Creature

Who best knows the intent of the Novel? the Author of the Novel

or the reader?

900 posted on 12/04/2006 2:13:27 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 898 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900901-908 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson