To: NormsRevenge
At one point, the crowd of a few hundred counted off to 50, the number of rounds fired.
These guys were unarmed. I've yet to read any attempt to justify this. I've been busy this weekend though and may have missed it.
2 posted on
11/26/2006 6:22:09 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: NormsRevenge
I'm glad to see everybody is waiting for a police report to explain the Police's side of the story instead of jumping to conclusions. Al Sharpton for President!
3 posted on
11/26/2006 6:30:21 PM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: NormsRevenge
Ok this has been here before, but why are they after Kelly before he even has a chance to investigate.
If I could I would place 5 bucks on the assumption that the shooters were members of 100 Blacks in law enforcement who care. or at least they were black officers doing the shooting. A White officer in that club would have stood out like a snowflake in a coal bin.
The fact that the ace of the officers wasnt mentioned is telling. The we have good old Al Sharpton inciting to riot again. Tawana Brawley didnt teach this idiot anything.
4 posted on
11/26/2006 6:32:14 PM PST by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: NormsRevenge
One fewer criminal in the world, the police did a good job in protecting the public and should be rewarded for their actions.
This Sean Bell character was a lowlife, having children out of wedlock, hanging out at strip clubs at 4a.m. on the day of his wedding, striking a police officer with his car and then ramming a police vehicle.
A car used as a weapon is deadly force, Bell was armed with a 3000 pound weapon, the police responded with equal and just force.
7 posted on
11/26/2006 6:40:10 PM PST by
TracyTucson
(Teachers : Overpaid and Underworked........ Eliminate > ADA, EOE, NLRB, SS, DOE)
To: NormsRevenge
If you want my opinion, the police were trigger happy.
To: NormsRevenge
Well! If the mob says so...
10 posted on
11/26/2006 6:48:59 PM PST by
AmishDude
(Mark Steyn is my hero.)
To: NormsRevenge
He clearly struck an unmarked officer's car. The police feared for his life. But Al Sharpton is not one to let the truth get in the way of a racial shakedown and blaming the police before all the facts are known about the case. It seems to me the NYPD did have cause to use justified force to save the life of an officer. Why that is not as important to Fat Al, considering the groom's criminal and reckless conduct, is reprehensible.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
15 posted on
11/26/2006 6:58:50 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: NormsRevenge
Sharpton. Now there is a real truth seeker.
28 posted on
11/26/2006 7:13:34 PM PST by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: NormsRevenge
I hope we get a toxicology report on the victim. If he was drunk or even just buzzed, maybe it was just bad driving.
32 posted on
11/26/2006 7:17:05 PM PST by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: NormsRevenge
That Joseph Guzman is one lucky fellow.
How do you get shot 11 times and live?
If I ever got shot, one bullet, and I'd be dead before I hit the ground.....
49 posted on
11/26/2006 7:42:51 PM PST by
exit82
(Clinton didn't try. He just failed.)
To: NormsRevenge
The police department's policy on shooting at moving vehicles states: "Police officers shall not discharge their firearms at or from a moving vehicle unless deadly force is being used against the police officers or another person present, by means other than a moving vehicle." So, if a suspect is A-OK as long as the only deadly force they use against a cop is his automobile. Just run the cops over/off the road,etc. and they are not allowed to respond with deadly force????
There are a LOT of questions to be answered in this case. Was there a gun or not? If one of those involved claimed to have one, then that changes things somewhat. The driver repeatedly struck the officer's vehicle. I hope the cops ID'ed themselves. If so, the question begs---why ram the police, strike an officer, and resist?
55 posted on
11/26/2006 8:01:19 PM PST by
TheBattman
(I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
To: NormsRevenge
Think I will wait until all the name calling etc. dies down and the actual reporting of what caused this is reported.
Sharpton would never pass up a chance to incite a riot.
73 posted on
11/26/2006 8:42:44 PM PST by
Dustbunny
(The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
To: NormsRevenge
Looks like the Dinkins era has returned to NYC.
To: NormsRevenge
An undercover officer walked closely behind Bell and his friends as they headed for their car. As he walked toward the front of the vehicle, the car drove forward striking the officer and a nearby undercover police vehicle, Kelly said. A moving car has a LOT more kinetic energy than a bullet. I'd have emptied a magazine into the car as well.
93 posted on
11/26/2006 11:59:09 PM PST by
Centurion2000
(If the Romans had nukes, Carthage would still be glowing.)
To: NormsRevenge
"We've got to understand that all of us were in that car."
The circus is in town?
103 posted on
11/27/2006 8:16:12 AM PST by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson