Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY: Crowd denounces police killing of groom
AP on Yahoo ^ | 11/26/06 | Deepti Hajela - ap

Posted on 11/26/2006 6:18:47 PM PST by NormsRevenge

NEW YORK - An angry crowd demanded Sunday to know why police officers killed an unarmed man on the day of his wedding, firing dozens of shots that also wounded two of the man's friends. Some called for the ouster of the city's police commissioner.

At a vigil and rally the day after 23-year-old Sean Bell was supposed to have married the mother of his two young children, a crowd led by the Rev. Al Sharpton shouted "No justice, no peace."

At one point, the crowd of a few hundred counted off to 50, the number of rounds fired.

"We cannot allow this to continue to happen," Sharpton said at the gathering outside Mary Immaculate Hospital, where one of the wounded men was in critical condition. "We've got to understand that all of us were in that car."

Some in the crowd called for the ouster of Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, yelling "Kelly must go."

The police officers' group 100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care said it was issuing a vote of no confidence in Kelly over the shooting.

Paul Browne, chief spokesman for the NYPD, said Sunday: "We are continuing to look for additional witnesses to shed light on the incident, and assisting the district attorney's office with its investigation."

The five officers were placed on paid administrative leave pending the investigation, Browne said.

Community leaders planned a rally Dec. 6 at police headquarters.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg and his aides were in contact with Bell's family and community leaders throughout the weekend. Bloomberg and Kelly also planned to meet Monday with community leaders at City Hall.

The shootings occurred at about 4 a.m. Saturday outside the Kalua Cabaret, a strip club where Bell's bachelor party was held. The survivors were Joseph Guzman, 31, who was shot at least 11 times, and Trent Benefield, 23, who was hit three times. Guzman was in critical condition Sunday and Benefield was stable.

Relatives of all three men — many of them stoic, and some crying — attended Sunday's vigil but none spoke publicly.

At a news conference Saturday, Kelly said the department was still piecing together what happened, and that it was too early to say whether the shooting was justified.

The car, driven by Bell, was struck by 21 of the police bullets after the vehicle rammed an undercover officer and hit an unmarked NYPD minivan. Other shots hit nearby homes and shattered windows at a train station, though no one else was injured.

Police thought one of the men in the car might have had a gun but investigators found no weapons. It was unclear what prompted police to open fire, Kelly said.

It was also not clear whether the shooters had identified themselves as police, Kelly said.

Kelly said the confrontation stemmed from an undercover operation inside the strip club in the Jamaica section of Queens. Seven officers in plain clothes were investigating the Kalua Cabaret; five of them were involved in the shooting.

According to Kelly, the groom was involved in a verbal dispute outside the club and one of his friends made a reference to a gun.

An undercover officer walked closely behind Bell and his friends as they headed for their car. As he walked toward the front of the vehicle, the car drove forward — striking the officer and a nearby undercover police vehicle, Kelly said.

The officer who had followed the group on foot was apparently the first to open fire, Kelly said. That officer had served on the force for five years. One 12-year veteran fired his weapon 31 times, emptying two full magazines, Kelly said.

Bell backed the car onto a sidewalk, hitting a building gate, authorities said. He then drove forward, striking the police vehicle a second time, Kelly said.

The police department's policy on shooting at moving vehicles states: "Police officers shall not discharge their firearms at or from a moving vehicle unless deadly force is being used against the police officers or another person present, by means other than a moving vehicle."

In 1999, NYPD officers killed Amadou Diallo, an unarmed West African immigrant who was shot 19 times in the entry to his apartment building. The four officers in that case were acquitted of criminal charges. In 2003, Ousmane Zongo, 43, a native of the western African country of Burkina Faso, was killed during a police raid on a warehouse where he repaired art and musical instruments. Zongo was shot four times, twice in the back.

___

Associated Press writer Tom Hays contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: crowd; denounces; donutwatch; groom; leo; nyc; policekilling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Mad Dawg

In response to post #53. I have yet to read an article slanted in any way towards the police. I've read numerous articles and expected an intelligent response defending the officers in this thread (FReepers are usually good in that department). I'm still waiting. The car was unmarked and the LEO's were undercover. This guy supposedly attacked them for no reason during his bachelor party. I'd like to see more info.


61 posted on 11/26/2006 8:08:12 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
If you want my opinion, the police were trigger happy.

Why wait for a silly insignificant Police investigation. The police should just speak with you because obviously you have all the facts since you were there!
62 posted on 11/26/2006 8:09:58 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

My response to that is post #46. What were these guys at a bachelor party supposedly doing again?


63 posted on 11/26/2006 8:11:01 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
People who have chosen to take a lower paying job -

Oh please. Spare me.

64 posted on 11/26/2006 8:15:08 PM PST by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

Yeah- just bad driving, striking the officer's car not once, but TWICE...


65 posted on 11/26/2006 8:15:10 PM PST by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tamzee; Sir_Ed
Tamzee's account is tragically true for too many cops. There are ample studies (and my own experience) to show that when some cops get assaulted with a deadly weapon the FIRST thing that goes through our minds (well, right after the "I can't believe this is happening,") is the departmental policy on continuum of force and whether or not we individually or the department will be sued.

Yes, there are some thugs out there. There are also a lot of brave and sacrificial cops. AND there are cops who will give up their own lives rather than take down the perp when the perp needs taking down. It's true. It's tragic.

Sir_ed, let me say again what I said in a previous post. Your municipal or county department could use your help as a reserve or a volunteer. Your deep knowledge of what policing is and requires would make you an asset. I hope you will think seriously about volunteering. It's a tough job, but it's got to be done, and most municipalities won't pay for the troops, the equipment, or the training to get it done as well as they'd like. Volunteers will be an increasingly important part of the force.

And, who knows, you might learn something. Please think it over.

66 posted on 11/26/2006 8:17:10 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
Yep- according to NYPD policy, a vehicle used to assault an officer does not merit deadly force....

Excuse me, I think I read that the NYPD doesn't like officers shooting into such a vehicle. It's not so much a matter of deadly force, I'd suggest, as a matter of the usual fecklessness of shooting into a moving vehicle and the danger to those in the area. I don't know what they shoot in NYC, and I'd worry about ricochets off of windows and tires and such.

Also, at least around here in Central VA, such policies usually mean, "unless you have an articulable reason" (always assuming articulable is a word).

In other words, an officer could exculpate himself by saying something like," I knew the policy was that we are not supposed to blah blah, but I could not evade the vehicle because of blah blah so my only defense was to shoot into it." In other words, the policies are not rigid, because when the battle flag goes up, sometimes you have to improvise, and they usually don't ask us to give up our lives for a policy -- at least they don't come right out and say it.

67 posted on 11/26/2006 8:24:35 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
According to the story the cop was hit first. That's enough cause to start shooting. I'll wait to see what comes out.

I don't trust sharpton, all he's looking for is money and/or power. He has incited riots that have left people dead. He doesn't seem to have a problem with blacks killing blacks (unless the shooter is a cop)or with blacks killing whites. He's actually a staunch advocate of mumia abu jamal who killed a white police officer.

68 posted on 11/26/2006 8:25:12 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002; NormsRevenge
Tawana Brawley didnt teach this idiot anything.

What do you mean it didn't teach him anything? Before the Tawana Brawley incident, who outside of New York knew who Al Sharpton was? He learned that any publicity is good publicity, and that his supporters don't care if Tawana Brawley and Al Sharpton were lying. In fact the bigger the lie the more people will believe it.

69 posted on 11/26/2006 8:27:03 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Karl Rove isn't magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
I'm sorry you didn't find my response intelligent. I thought it was pretty good.

I thought the whole incident happened AFTER the bachelor party. Are you saying you have issues with the accounts that the car hit an officer who was on foot and hit an unmarked car as well? On what basis? Please bear in mind that people do very weird stuff when they've had too much to drink.

70 posted on 11/26/2006 8:28:35 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
I can't see the cops being trigger happy. The last thing any cop wants to do these days is have to shoot someone in the line of duty even if it's justified. I know there are probably exceptions to this but all in all it's a big pain in ass to use deadly physical force against someone unless there is no other choice. The shooting now has to go before a grand jury and that doesn't look so good for the cops being that no weapon was found. Even in the best case scenario for the cops, say they are cleared from criminal wrong doing in regarding the shooting. They will still undoubtedly face a civil wrong-full death suit. I doubt they were trigger happy.
71 posted on 11/26/2006 8:34:36 PM PST by Wiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
I'm waiting, with bated breath, to hear the police dept's explanation for ventilating admittedly unarmed men at 4 AM/Since all honest conservatives have deep distrust of the police power, I wonder why freepers line up behind the gun-men, especially when there was no apparent imminent threat.

You don't need to wait. You obviously have conducted a thorough objective investigation. I suggest you hand over your report to the Police so they can learn how a well reasoned report based on facts and not assumptions can be done.

(Hint: don't even try to tell me that a drunken driver is deserving of being shot full of holes.)

I wouldn't think of telling you anything to the contrary since you have all the answers. Congratulations Sherlock!

72 posted on 11/26/2006 8:39:52 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Think I will wait until all the name calling etc. dies down and the actual reporting of what caused this is reported.

Sharpton would never pass up a chance to incite a riot.

73 posted on 11/26/2006 8:42:44 PM PST by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
We all think we know what "trigger happy" means. We are noe\w graced with some good -- excellent -- studies about what it's like to be in a situation where you think your life is threatened and you have the adrenaline dump and so on and so forth.

Since we have this information -- Read On Combat, On Killing, and the first chapters of Training at the Speed of Life -- terms like "trigger happy" are of decreasing usefulness in thinking about a deadly force situation.

The upstate returns aren't in on whether the decision to shoot at all was a good one. My impression, though, is that if the guys on the scene truly thought that one of their partners had been hit by a car which subsequently hit one of their cars and showed no signs of doing the legal thing, namely: stopping, then I can see why they thought the compost had just hit the air-conditioner.

I'm not sure they should have reached that decision, but I think I understand it.

But once they did decide it was time to get serious, the number of shots fired is great for headlines, but not especially remarkable when you look at what people really do when things get exciting.

To put it another way, the first shot MAY have been because of being "trigger-happy". The subsequent shots were just what usually happens when things get exciting.

Let me try to say this: I find training with my fire arm demanding but relaxing. I like to go to the range. I like to try to shoot well. But I hate what handguns represent. Since we live in a world where sometimes guns are necessary, I guess I'll step up. But I'd just as soon I did't have to think about gun fights, or sit here with my p239 digging into my butt.

And I can guarandamntee you that, since I have one magazine in the gun and two on my belt right now, if somebody shot at me through the window right now, one magazine would be emptied right away. I HOpe I'd save the others for afgter I'd taken cover and had a clue about what was going on.

Reality is NOT like TV or like the movies. Most of us crap in our pants when things get exciting - literally. That doesn't make for good TV or good movies, so you don't hear about it much, but there it is.

74 posted on 11/26/2006 8:52:23 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
In deputy training, they show a video of what happens when a deputy does not take action.

A young deputy in GA pulled over a driver who reaches for his gun, deputy drew his weapon and repeatedly asks the driver to lay down his gun and put his hands up. Driver ignores the repeated warnings, gets up an fires at the deputy who later dies from gunshot wounds. His patrol car video cam caught it all on tape. Real sad.

I posed the question on another thread. Many freepers have CCW permits. Wonder how they would have reacted if their car was rammed twice?

75 posted on 11/26/2006 8:52:33 PM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Looks like the Dinkins era has returned to NYC.


76 posted on 11/26/2006 8:56:45 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Bingo!

Thanks, oh stainless one.

Having skin in the game affects the thought process.

I always tell people who ask me about getting a fire arm: Visualize pieces of my skull and brain hitting the wall behind me. If you get a gun and you want to use it effectively, you have to decide NOW that it's okay to see pieces of skull and brain hitting the wall -- and to know you made that happen. It's too late to wrestle with it when you have to draw the gun you bought.

That poor deputy didn't want to kill the guy. He hadn't done his homework, he hadn't decided. Like a lot of cops he signed on to protect people, not harm them. God bless his sacrifical but maybe insufficiently prudent heart, and may God console all those who love him.

77 posted on 11/26/2006 9:02:12 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
Thank you for saying what I was about to

My pleasure :-)

Sharpton must be finding it curious having to move over to make room for some Freepers on his bandwagon... but there it is.

78 posted on 11/26/2006 9:20:45 PM PST by Tamzee (Thomas Jefferson - "Every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TracyTucson
One fewer criminal in the world, the police did a good job in protecting the public and should be rewarded for their actions

Oh, yes judge, jury and executioner the American way, I'm proud of your mental abilities.

79 posted on 11/26/2006 9:20:58 PM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

What? The car had already run into a police officer and rammed a police van *before* shots were fired.


80 posted on 11/26/2006 9:22:56 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson