Posted on 11/22/2006 9:56:36 AM PST by Maddox
Crowds who paid up to $500 to hear Donald Trump speak on how to get rich instead heard "The Donald" bashing Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and questioning the competence of the Bush administration.
When talk of wealth turned to politics at the private class at the Learning Annex, Trump first discussed Rice.
- said. "I don't care if she's lovely. I want someone who can go and make deals. She goes to countries and nothing ever happens except sound bites."
Trump also talked about outgoing Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
"Look at this guy Rumsfeld," Trump said. "Millions of people have been killed. We're spending as a country, I guess up to $900 billion so far but much more important arms and legs and lives are wasted, including the Iraqis by the way."
(Excerpt) Read more at local6.com ...
For a guy who marries the 'deals' he makes, the vows our Nation makes is supposed to last a little longer, Donald. Our problem is it cost us more when we divorce them. Maybe you can help us in that respect.
BDS?
Yes, everything would have been solved by "making a deal", perhaps you can send Ms. Rice a copy of your "Art of the Deal" with the new terrorist chapter in it.
Blowhard.
Pretty sad when all your money comes from Chapter 11s, isn't it?
Trump is conflating Iraq and Cambodia/Vietnam. Same ole crap from the same ole bleeding heart limousine liberals whose hearts only bleed for themselves.
"The Donald" fits that bill to a tee.
That assumes a deal is worth some sort of price we should be willing to pay.
You agree with that? You're a total idiot.
i just got off the phone with a GOP US Senate rep asking me to donate $$ so the could recruit better candidates.
I refused. And said $$ wont assure better candidates.
Only good moralistic traditional prospects will.
Look at all the $$ the GOP had in 06, and they had an awful message delivery.
I also told him that GWB should set a drawdown schedule for Iraq, to give leery Americans hope we wont be there forever.
If things change on the ground, then we can change the schedule.
We change all the time. "we must win" is NOt a plan.
When is he going to do something, anything, about that comb-over????
I can
This guy's "bidness" prowess is much overblown. He is another liberal blowhard who fell into his money. Rummy was an excellent SecDef, who, unfortunatley, became the first sacrificial victim to appease the Lefties in Congress.
Why do so many people listen to this blowhard about finances? I wonder how screwed over Trump's creditors got when he went bankrupt?..TWICE!
Yes, it is clearly hyperbole, but it is also clear that the war in Iraq was a mistake. Most Americans agree and in part that was the reason for the election fiasco.
The armchair general speaks!
Most Americans agree? Any reasonable poll is about 55/45 with 45% of Americans saying it was NOT a mistake. You must be with the 55% of ignorant dopes who think we can just look away and radical Islam will disappear. You are an idiot.
Next time, please post the views of a deeper thinker, for example Paris Hilton.
;-)
Donald, we just can't take you seriously until you take the muskrat off your head.
However, Trump's Surrender Now dogmas may lead to the USA suffering millions of dead and trillions in costs if the Terrorists get their hands on chemical or nuclear weapons.
Here is what we are up to in Iraq. The Neo-Isolationists and Appeacement Now Leftists should try learning some BASIC facts about Iraq rathern then mindlessly scream their 09-10-01 dogmas.
Why Iraq
One of the really infuriating things in modern politics is the level of disinformation, misinformation, demagoguery and out right lying going on about the mission in Iraq. Democrats have spent the last 3+ years lying about Iraq out of a political calculation. The assumption is that the natural isolationist mindset of the average American voter, linked to the inherent Anti Americanism (what is misnamed the "Anti War movement") of the more feverish Democrat activists (especially those running the US's National "News" media) would restore them to national political dominance. The truth is the Democrat Party Leadership has simply lacked the courage to speak truth to whiners. The truth is that even if Al Gore won the 2000 election and 09-11 still happened we would be doing the EXACT same things in Iraq we are doing now.
Based on the political situation in the region left over from the 1991 Gulf War plus the domestic political consensus built up in BOTH parties since 1991 as well as fundamental military strategic laws, there was NO viable strategic choice for the US but to take out Iraq after finishing the initial operations in Afghanistan.
To start with Saddam's Iraq was our most immediate threat. We could NOT commit significant military forces to another battle with Saddam hovering undefeated on our flank nor could we leave significant forces watching Saddam. The political containment of Iraq was breaking down. That what Oil for Food was all about. Oil for Food was an attempt by Iraq to break out of it's diplomatic isolation and slip the shackles the UN Sanctions put on it's military. There there was the US Strategic position to consider.
The War on Islamic Fascism is different sort of war. in facing this Asymmetrical threat, we have a hidden foe, spread out across a geographically diverse area, with covert sources of supply. Since we cannot go everywhere they hide out, in fact often cannot even locate them until the engage us, we need to draw them out of hiding into a kill zone.
Iraq is that kill zone. That is the true brilliance of the Iraq strategy. We draw the terrorists out of their world wide hiding places onto a battlefield they have to fight on for political reasons (The "Holy" soil of the Arabian peninsula) where they have to pit their weakest ability (Conventional Military combat power) against our greatest strength (ability to call down unbelievable amounts of firepower) where they will primarily have to fight other forces (the Iraqi Security forces) in a battlefield that is mostly neutral in terms of guerrilla warfare. (Iraqi-mostly open terrain as opposed to guerrilla friendly areas like the mountains of Afghanistan or the jungles of SE Asia).
Did any of the critics of liberating Iraq ever look at a map? Iraq, for which we had the political, legal and moral justifications to attack, is the strategic high ground of the Middle East. A Geographic barrier that severs ground communication between Iran and Syria apart as well as providing another front of attack in either state or into Saudi Arabia if needed.
There were other reasons to do Iraq but here is the strategic military reason we are in Iraq. We have taken, an maintain the initiative from the Terrorists. They are playing OUR game on ground of OUR choosing.
Problem is Counter Insurgency is SLOW and painful. Often a case of 3 steps forward, two steps back. One has to wonder if the American people have either the emotional maturity, nor the intellect" to understand. It's so much easier to spew made for TV slogans like "No Blood for Oil" or "We support the Troops, bring them home" or dumbest of all "We are creating terrorists" then to actually THINK.
Westerners in general, and the US citizens in particular seem to have trouble grasping the fundamental fact of this foe. These Islamic Fascists have NO desire to co-exist with them. The extremists see all this PC posturing by the Hysteric Left as a sign that we are weak. Since they want us dead, weakness encourages them. There is simply no way to coexist with people who completely believe their "god" will reward them for killing us.
So we can covert to Islam, die or kill them. Iraq is about killing enough of them to make the rest of the Jihadists realize we are serious. They same way killing enough Germans, Italians and Japanese eliminated the ideologies of Nazism, Fascism and Bushido.
Americans need to understand how Bin Laden and his ilk view us. In the Arab world the USA is considered a big wimp. We have run away so many times. Lebanon, the Kurds, the Iraqis in 1991, the Iranians, Somalia, Clinton all thru the 1990s etc etc etc. The Jihadists think we will run again. In fact they are counting on it. That way they can run around screaming "We beat the American just like the Russians, come join us in Jihad" and recruit the next round of "holy warriors". Iraq is also a show place where we show the Muslim world that there are a lines they cannot cross. On 9-11-01 they crossed that line and we can, and will, destroy them for it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.