Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Republicans: What Went Wrong? (internal audit being conducted)
LA Times ^ | 11/21/06 | Robert Salladay

Posted on 11/21/2006 6:53:39 PM PST by NormsRevenge

The California Republican Party is conducting an internal audit over why its unprecedented $20 million get-out-the-vote effort didn't produce wins for their candidates on election day. Only Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and insurance commissioner Steve Poizner captured statewide offices for the GOP, which also failed to pick up any new seats in the Legislature. One Republican incumbent, Secretary of State Bruce McPherson, was unseated.

Some conservative Republicans are demanding answers from the party. State Board of Equalization member Bill Leonard, who was reelected to his regional seat by a large margin, already has asked for the audit of the statewide effort. He has heard "rumors" that the GOP telephoned voters using scripts written by Schwarzenegger's team that only mentioned Schwarzenegger, that there was "mischief" with literature distributed on door-hangers in neighborhoods, and that the Republican Party may have called non-Republicans to encourage them to vote.

"... what is needed is full disclosure by the CRP leadership, a detailed political audit of how this campaign was waged. The party members, donors and volunteers deserve to know the full truth and the actual numbers."

--snip--

Mike Spence, another Republican activist, said other problems emerged during the get-out-the-vote effort: the GOP sparsely canvassed precincts in eastern Los Angeles County and an outreach program to churches "died wandering in the desert." He also has called for an audit. Spence said the conservative ideology of some Republicans, such as lieutenant governor candidate Tom McClintock, can't account for their losses. If so, he said, why did a moderate like McPherson not benefit from the get-out-the-vote message that swept Schwarzenegger to victory in a landslide?

California GOP chairman Duf Sundheim said he thinks the $20 million effort proved effective, particularly in early voting by mail. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: cagop; california; election; elections; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Will the CAGOP leadership accept responsibility and resign? I'm not holding my breath...

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

61 posted on 11/22/2006 12:34:53 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: spacecowboynj
most liberal state in America.

You keep telling yourself that, Jersey...

64 posted on 11/22/2006 4:58:14 AM PST by newzjunkey (Speaker Pelosi thanks cannibalistic conservatives for her victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
A dangerous precedent was set, a lot of people were not represented this election for Governor. It's like voting for a dictatorship, I have never felt so appalled to vote for a candidate.

Thank you; you've just indicated that any form of representative republic is utter anathema to you.

65 posted on 11/22/2006 5:04:35 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Republicans are told to court "the base," which translates to Arabic as "al-Qaeda.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Let me see if I grasp your angle on this: you say Republicans did come out in greater numbers but because the GOP GOTV effort spun in favor of Arnold it pulled Rats to polls in even great numbers.

OK, so what's wrong with an audit to see if Dems were pulled to the polls by GOP GOTV efforts?

Look, it comes down to the simple fact that Republicans had an albatross around their necks which motivated even more Dems to vote. Doesn't mean Arnold's to blame.

The election's over, let's look at the facts and move on. I'm less worried about 2006 than McCain, Rudy and the other characters positioning for 2008! The time to decide our standard bearers is the primary season. Let's make it a good one!

Oh, and now's the time to get back to pulling Arnold rightward and demanding reforms again.

66 posted on 11/22/2006 5:19:58 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

If the GOP grew testicles and took testosterone, perhaps they could counter the six years of Liberal crap the Party has wimped out on. My criticism goes for the entire country, not just California. Until they fight the Liberals head on and prove that what they're spewing are lies and distortions, they will continue to lose everywhere.


67 posted on 11/22/2006 5:23:58 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bboop
The money was spent ONLY for Arnold, I was told. ...

Who told you? One of the ilk herd perhaps.

68 posted on 11/22/2006 5:28:33 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

FO said 'it seems' and that is not a lie. You supported Arnie's defeat, ergo, you supported Philth. Now you're attacking another Republican, Poiner. You're the deceitful one, and a real piece of work at that.


69 posted on 11/22/2006 5:39:26 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Sure, the ilk get tired of the truth, thats a given.


70 posted on 11/22/2006 5:40:20 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
You're the deceitful one, and a real piece of work at that.

OK. I'll play. Make this one go away.

The CaGOP didn't even bother to run candidates in 7 congressional districts in California, giving thousands of Republicans in those districts no chance to voice their opinions in national affairs. One of those districts in the heart of the very conservative, San Joaquin Valley.

7 districts. No vote!

71 posted on 11/22/2006 8:13:32 AM PST by Amerigomag (Don't blame me. I don't vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Gee, the CaGOP runs candidates? Hmmm, and I always thought that individuals ran, and then garnered party support, if they could.
72 posted on 11/22/2006 8:36:34 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
and then garnered party support, if they could.

That does, indeed, sound like the CaGOP's MO.

There is no doubt that the CaGOP is wondering around in the wilderness. The lack of organization and the almost non existent leadership of Sundheim were the two main reasons why the Wilsonegger Gang was so easily able to co-opt the party in the summer of 2003.

The behavior of the CaGOP over these past 3 years has be inexcusable and the party will continue to languish on the fringe as it pursues expediency in a desperate effort to remain significant. The necessary changes in the CaGOP must start at the local level, at the Central Committees, if the party is too survive.

Donor development, volunteer recruitment, development at secondary and post secondary institutions, the creation of opportunities for young volunteers to participate as interns and identification/development of potential candidates are all local undertakings.

73 posted on 11/22/2006 9:08:35 AM PST by Amerigomag (Don't blame me. I don't vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
"moonbeam"

Stop it you two... You're crackin me up!!!

74 posted on 11/22/2006 9:13:07 AM PST by SierraWasp (GovernMental EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
it looks like the $20 million GOTV effort actually went to mobilize liberals. Since the Governor was bound and determined to get his $43 Billion big-borrowing-Bonanza passed, and to defeat the eminent domain measure, you can be sure they weren't "microtargeting" conservative homeowners.

Bingo! We have a winner.

75 posted on 11/22/2006 9:21:52 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

What part of I was not represented(my views on how to govern) in the least in this election for governor do you not understand?


76 posted on 11/22/2006 10:39:18 AM PST by John Lenin (The most dangerous place for a child in America is indeed in its mother's womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Thank you; you've just indicated that any form of representative republic

40% of the state was not represented, taxation without representation will lead to a new Boston Tea Party. I have a feeling it's coming sooner than you think.
77 posted on 11/22/2006 10:43:54 AM PST by John Lenin (The most dangerous place for a child in America is indeed in its mother's womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Quit posting your lies, FO.

The true art is:

1) First lure these Republican trolls out from under their bridge.

Usually a positive word about one of their candidates will get them out into the sunshine, out of curiosity, if nothing else. Try "Schwarzenegger is good for the Republican Party"

2) Then provoke them into climbing up the creek embankment to better do battle

Stick to politics, keep it impersonal and don't mention facts whatever you do. I'd suggest " But if Schwarzenegger keeps going left, the CaGOP will be in shambles bu 2010."

3) Once the troll is out of the creek bottom, on the shoulder of the highway, interject something personal that will drive them, in a rage, onto the public highway.

I personally prefer " Your associate Duf is an incompetent fool. Prominent party officials are demanding an investigation right now for corruption"

The combination of their poor eyesight and blind rage will make them a perfect target for a drive-by Democrat.

After the collision flee. The odor is overpowering.

78 posted on 11/22/2006 10:45:32 AM PST by Amerigomag (Don't blame me. I don't vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
40% of the state was not represented

Solely because they decided to throw a tantrum and not vote for ANYBODY. Representative government means, ultimately, that SOMEBODY isn't going to be "represented" somewhere, because each election has a winner and a loser.

Or are you hoping for something like what Obrador is doing in Mexico? Reading onward:

taxation without representation will lead to a new Boston Tea Party. I have a feeling it's coming sooner than you think.

I think I get it. You want to use the "I'm not represented" BS to justify a program of terrorism and insurrection.

79 posted on 11/22/2006 10:56:25 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Republicans are told to court "the base," which translates to Arabic as "al-Qaeda.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

Listen up, I didn't agree with 90% of Rinolds platform and if you did, admit it, you are No conservative.


80 posted on 11/22/2006 11:00:07 AM PST by John Lenin (The most dangerous place for a child in America is indeed in its mother's womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson