Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9

This was a good article. Thank you for posting it.

Webb is right about the economic issues.
Dead right.
The Republican model is skewed towards the top.
The Democrat model has been skewed towards the bottom.

Politicially, the right thing to do is skew the tax structure and job security towards the middle.


4 posted on 11/21/2006 12:22:44 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vicomte13


Uh, how would you propose we legislate "job security?"


5 posted on 11/21/2006 12:24:20 PM PST by presidio9 (Tagline Censored)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13

The middle and the bottom do not create jobs. Without jobs there is no job security.


6 posted on 11/21/2006 12:24:20 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13

Good article ? Maybe if you are a Marxist and believe in the tenets of 'The Communist Manifesto'. Some people have no clue about economics and fall prey to emotional appeals and arguments.


12 posted on 11/21/2006 12:31:55 PM PST by KMAJ2 (Freedom not defended is freedom relinquished, liberty not fought for is liberty lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13
Politicially, the right thing to do is skew the tax structure and job security towards the middle.

Or better yet, get rid of income tax.

17 posted on 11/21/2006 12:36:31 PM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13
Politicially, the right thing to do is skew the tax structure and job security towards the middle.

A family of 4 making 40 grand pays practically nothing in income taxes.

The bottom 50% of wage earners pay 5% of the income taxes.

If we skew things anymore towards the middle we'll have to declare the "rich" indentured servants.

44 posted on 11/21/2006 12:53:37 PM PST by NeoCaveman (Have you thanked the rich person who subsidized your share of taxation today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13
Dead right.

You've got a typo in there. He's dead ~wrong~.

Just tryin' ta' be helpful. :-)

51 posted on 11/21/2006 12:56:08 PM PST by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13

Why do we have to skew the tax structure at all?


88 posted on 11/21/2006 1:29:46 PM PST by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13
The tax structure is already skewed. It's called progressive taxation.

And I don't want to see it "skewed" any worse than it already is.

96 posted on 11/21/2006 1:38:50 PM PST by Doodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13
The Democrat model has been skewed towards the bottom.

How right you are!!

THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL.

Which is all you would get if the Democrats had their way.

The GOP philosophy, and the GOP efforts, are geared toward levels of the economic strata being better able to earn and provide for themselves and family.

What, pray tell, are the Democrats doing for the "bottom"??

101 posted on 11/21/2006 1:44:48 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13
The Republican model is skewed towards the top. The Democrat model has been skewed towards the bottom.

Consider this fact:

The Clinton economy in the 90s was built on phony dot.com wealth, which in reality was simply overinflated companies which had no backbone and no infrastructure.

The GWB economy of 2001-2006 is built on reality, with companies making REAL earnings, and building REAL infrastructure.

Amazingly, the Bush economy is bringing along the entire world, with REAL growth and REAL investment.

The Clinton economy diss-intentigrated as soon as people realized their hard earned money was invested in a Ponzi scheme (dot.com.baloney).

Thankfully, the GWB economy is backed up by an American workforce second to none, with a RECORD number of people who OWN THEIR HOMES.

It's amazing that there are so many smart people who cant see that.

109 posted on 11/21/2006 1:58:19 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13

The flood of illegal aliens is the reason that wages in bottom have fallen further behind. Here, the one-world globalists are at fault. They really believe in this stuff. Guess who benefits. The privileged elites get the lion's share of the gains in productivity -- not the hardscrapple workers and the middle class. The middle class is also squeezed by medical expenses, which can be blamed on two main causes: illegal aliens driving up the cost of medical care, which is shifted to middle class users and a system that does not promote competition among health care providers.


216 posted on 11/22/2006 7:27:24 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13
Dead right.

Exactly. The Democrats have succeeded in ruining the educational system -- millions of young people can not be held to standards because of the Democrats. Failure at being able to learn skills necessary to make good money has been the result. The economy is hanging by a thread.

246 posted on 11/22/2006 2:07:18 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13
Politically, the right thing to do is skew the tax structure and job security towards the middle.

Your post says Democrats have been able to frame the debate. On those terms the debate will be about how much revenue will be generated from taxes and who will get the spoils, not whether more tax revenue and bigger government are good for the country.

Republicans need to be the party of lower taxes and smaller government. This helps every American regardless of their economic status. Frame the argument properly and Republicans have a chance to prevail; let Democrats frame the argument and Republicans have lost before the debate begins.
270 posted on 11/26/2006 10:06:42 AM PST by sonofpatriots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson