Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Live Thread Tuesday Nov 21st, 2006
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | 11-21-2006

Posted on 11/21/2006 8:30:44 AM PST by MNJohnnie

Rumsfeld

By Douglas Feit Sunday, November 19, 2006

Much of what you know about Donald Rumsfeld is wrong.

I know, because I worked intimately with him for four years, from the summer of 2001 until I left the Pentagon in August 2005.

Through countless meetings and private conversations, I came to learn his traits, frame of mind and principles -- characteristics wholly at odds with the standard public depiction of Rumsfeld, particularly now that he has stepped down after a long, turbulent tenure as defense secretary, a casualty of our toxic political climate.

I want to set the record straight: Don Rumsfeld is not an ideologue. He did not refuse to have his views challenged. He did not ignore the advice of his military advisers. And he did not push single-mindedly for war in Iraq. He was motivated to serve the national interest by transforming the military, though it irritated people throughout the Pentagon.

Rumsfeld's drive to modernize created a revealing contrast between his Pentagon and the State Department -- where Colin Powell was highly popular among the staff. After four years of Powell's tenure at State, the organization chart there would hardly tip anyone off that 9/11 had occurred -- or even that the Cold War was over.

Rumsfeld is a bundle of paradoxes, like a fascinating character in a work of epic literature. And as my high school teachers drummed into my head, the best literature reveals that humans are complex. They are not the all-good or all-bad, all-brilliant or all-dumb figures that inhabit trashy novels and news stories. Fine literature teaches us the difference between appearance and reality.

Because of his complexity, Rumsfeld often is misread. His politics are deeply conservative but he was radical in his drive to force change in every area he oversaw. He is strong-willed and hard-driving but he built his defense strategies and Quadrennial Defense Reviews on calls for intellectual humility.

Those of us in his inner circle heard him say over and over again: Our intelligence, in all senses of the term, is limited. We cannot predict the future. We must continually question our preconceptions and theories. If events contradict them, don't suppress the bad news; rather, change your preconceptions and theories.

If an ideologue is someone to whom the facts don't matter, then Rumsfeld is the opposite of an ideologue. He insists that briefings for him be full of facts, thoughtfully organized and rigorously sourced. He demands that facts at odds with his key policy assumptions be brought to his attention immediately. "Bad news never gets better with time," he says, and berates any subordinate who fails to rush forward to him with such news. He does not suppress bad news; he acts on it.

Rumsfeld's drive to overhaul the Pentagon -- to drop outdated practices, programs and ideas -- antagonized many senior military officers and civilian officials in the department. He pushed for doing more with less. He pushed for reorganizing offices and relationships to adapt to a changing world. After 9/11, he created the Northern Command (the first combatant command that included the U.S. homeland among its areas of responsibility), a new undersecretary job for intelligence and a new assistant secretary job for homeland defense.

Seeking to improve civil-military cooperation, Rumsfeld devised new institutions for the Pentagon's top civilian and military officials to work face to face on strategic matters and new venues for all of them to gather a few times a year with the combatant commanders. He also conceived and pushed through a thorough revision of how U.S. military forces are based, store equipment, move and train with partners around the world -- something that was never done before in U.S. history.

On Iraq, Rumsfeld helped President Bush analyze the dangers posed by Saddam Hussein's regime. Given Saddam's history -- starting wars; using chemical weapons against foreign and domestic enemies; and training, financing and otherwise supporting various terrorists -- Rumsfeld helped make the case that leaving him in power entailed significant risks.

But in October 2002, Rumsfeld also wrote a list of the risks involved in removing Saddam from power. (I called the list his "parade of horribles" memo.) He reviewed it in detail with the president and the National Security Council. Rumsfeld's warnings about the dangers of war -- including the perils of a post-Saddam power vacuum -- were more comprehensive than anything I saw from the CIA, State or elsewhere. Rumsfeld continually reminded the president that he had no risk-free option for dealing with the dangers Saddam posed.

Historians will sort out whether Rumsfeld was too pushy with his military, or not pushy enough; whether he micromanaged Ambassador L. Paul Bremer and the Coalition Provisional Authority, or gave them too much slack. I know more about these issues than most people, yet I don't have all the information for a full analysis. I do know, however, that the common view of Rumsfeld as a close-minded man, ideologically wedded to the virtues of a small force, is wrong.

Rumsfeld had to resign, I suppose, because our bitter and noxious political debate of recent years has turned him into a symbol. His effectiveness was damaged. For many in Congress and the public, the Rumsfeld caricature dominated their view of the Iraq war and the administration's ability to prosecute it successfully. Even if nominee Robert Gates pursues essentially the same strategies, he may garner more public confidence.

What Rumsfeld believed, said and did differs from the caricature. The public picture of him today is drawn from news accounts reflecting the views of people who disapproved of his policies or disliked him. Rumsfeld, after all, can be brutally demanding and tough.

But I believe history will be more appreciative of him than the first draft has been. What will last is serious history, which, like serious literature, can distinguish appearance from reality.

Douglas J. Feith, a professor at Georgetown University, served as undersecretary of defense for policy from 2001 to 2005.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: kingtalker; rushlimbaugh; talkradio; theroadback
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-358 next last
To: olde north church

Exactly. Blame President Bush and all will be forgiven.

This is such a non-issue. Do we ever hear for an apology(ies) when the left bashes Catholics? Or when Blacks bash whites? How about an apology from the hecklers "cracker" comment. It was a stupid thing to say but people need to move on.


181 posted on 11/21/2006 10:04:13 AM PST by bluerose (Republicans fight the War on Terror. Democrats fight the war on President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: nhoward14

... Singing Fillet'd, BBQ'd, Shark Hat ...
Something you might find in a Lillian Vernon catalog. LOL!


182 posted on 11/21/2006 10:05:22 AM PST by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark

Yikes, you had to fire your contractor? How bad is the damage?

Thanksgiving will be a peaceful day with great food, great people, and lots of football. The best! Hope yours is wonderful, too.


183 posted on 11/21/2006 10:05:38 AM PST by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

"I hope they go for it. It would have the same bitch slapping effect on our 100%ers that the Clintonites attempt to Nationalize Health Care did in 1993 ."

ANd considering that Her Thighness wants to bring back that failed socialist plan as well...it owuld be quite interesting to see the Libtards try and shove BOTH of these plans down our collective throats at once.


184 posted on 11/21/2006 10:06:20 AM PST by txradioguy (Dec. 1st 2006 I become a third generation NCO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Great voice, great intellect, and a great sense of humor too.

Really! Then I wish he'd get a chance to sub for Rush.

185 posted on 11/21/2006 10:07:09 AM PST by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade

It comes from "Happy Days" when an episode ran about the Fonz jumping a shark with his motorcycle.

"jump the shark" per Wikipedia...

Jumping the shark is a metaphor that was originally used to denote the tipping point at which a TV series is deemed to have passed its peak, or has introduced plot twists that are illogical in terms of everything that has preceded them. Once a show has "jumped the shark", fans sense a noticeable decline in quality or feel the show has undergone too many changes to retain its original charm. The term has also evolved to describe other areas of pop culture, including movie series, music, or acting celebrities or authors for whom a drastic change was seen as the beginning of the end. These changes are often attempts to attract their fans' waning attention with over-the-top statements or increasingly overt appeals to sex or violence. Some have broadened its use to simply describe any decline in appeal for the subject in question, without requiring a significant "jump the shark" moment as justification.


186 posted on 11/21/2006 10:07:16 AM PST by nhoward14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark
Isn't it amazing that Alabama, Mississippi and Florida managed their Katrina devestation just fine. Bush only singled out New Orleans?????????????????????

Texas managed Hurricane Rita just fine too.

Somehow the very idea that any of the harm that came to the people in New Orleans is anyone's fault but the Governor of that state is simply WRONG

187 posted on 11/21/2006 10:07:36 AM PST by OldFriend (FALLEN HERO JEFFREY TOCZYLOWSKI, REST IN PEACE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade

See here.

188 posted on 11/21/2006 10:07:40 AM PST by isthisnickcool (I'm not really mad as I seem. I'm just right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Darth Republican

I used to love "MASH". When I started watching it in
re-runs years later. I was amazed at how screamingly
lame, whiney and elitist it is. Hawkeye is a big
baby. Blech!


189 posted on 11/21/2006 10:07:49 AM PST by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Hah, no answer! LOL...

I can't understand it.../s

190 posted on 11/21/2006 10:08:11 AM PST by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Glenn Beck isn't on CNN exactly. He's on CNN Headline News, a different channel entirely.


191 posted on 11/21/2006 10:08:17 AM PST by Darth Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Close second to CNN who now has Glenn Beck to balance the rest of their pitiful programming.

I like Glenn Beck, but to say he balances the anti-American not only CNN Prime, but CNN International (which is about as hateful as Al-Jazeera)...I wouldn't go that far. CNN generally is still far worse, although all the "conservatives" on PMSNBC are ersatz IMHO.

192 posted on 11/21/2006 10:08:57 AM PST by LibertyLee (George W. Bush a Great President--US out of the UN and UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It's the name that Rush has used for members of his staff for as long as I can remember.

There have been several Snerdly's.

If memory serves it's a joke that goes back to his days in radio in (I think) Pittsburgh.


193 posted on 11/21/2006 10:09:23 AM PST by txradioguy (Dec. 1st 2006 I become a third generation NCO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: nhoward14; StoneWall Brigade

Thanks very much for that explanation of "jump the shark", nhoward! I never did understand it until now. And thanks for asking the question, StoneWall.


194 posted on 11/21/2006 10:10:13 AM PST by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

That's right. I forgot that. Thanks!


195 posted on 11/21/2006 10:10:18 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

I see now thanks


196 posted on 11/21/2006 10:10:20 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Rick Santorum And Newt Gingrich08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: bluerose

Kane West is still out there bashing all things white. No one cares. He just goes on his merry way.


197 posted on 11/21/2006 10:10:53 AM PST by OldFriend (FALLEN HERO JEFFREY TOCZYLOWSKI, REST IN PEACE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: nhoward14
Michael Richards didn't just jump the shark... He filleted it, barbecued it, and put the head on as a hat while singing "It's a Small World After All".

Stick a fork in me... I'm done

198 posted on 11/21/2006 10:11:20 AM PST by Darth Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
.I assure you Snerdley would be an awesome guest host. Great voice, great intellect, and a great sense of humor too.

His real name is James Goldin, isn't it? I never heard him myself, but I heard he had a good show. I never knew why he didn't make it...

199 posted on 11/21/2006 10:11:20 AM PST by LibertyLee (George W. Bush a Great President--US out of the UN and UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark
I used to love "MASH". When I started watching it in re-runs years later. I was amazed at how screamingly lame, whiney and elitist it is. Hawkeye is a big baby. Blech!

That describes my experience with it exactly!

200 posted on 11/21/2006 10:11:35 AM PST by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-358 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson